scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

New regression formula for toric intraocular lens calculations

TLDR
Adjustment of commercial toric IOL calculators by the Abulafia‐Koch formula significantly improved the prediction of postoperative astigmatic outcome.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and compare the accuracy of 2 toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators with or without a new regression formula. Setting Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, and the Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. Design Retrospective case series. Methods A new regression formula (Abulafia-Koch) was developed to calculate the estimated total corneal astigmatism based on standard keratometry measurements. The error in the predicted residual astigmatism was calculated by the Alcon and Holladay toric IOL calculators with and without adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. These results were compared with those of the Barrett toric calculator. Results Data from 78 eyes were evaluated to validate the Abulafia-Koch formula. The centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism were against-the-rule with the Alcon (0.55 diopter [D]) and Holladay (0.54 D) toric calculators and decreased to 0.05 D ( P x -axis], P  = .776 [ y -axis]) and 0.04 D ( P x -axis], P  = .726 [ y -axis]) with adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. The Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators had a higher proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of the predicted residual astigmatism with the Abulafia-Koch formula (76.9% and 78.2%, respectively) than without it (both 30.8%). There were no significant differences between the results of the Abulafia-Koch-modified Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators and those of the Barrett toric calculator. Conclusion Adjustment of commercial toric IOL calculators by the Abulafia-Koch formula significantly improved the prediction of postoperative astigmatic outcome. Financial Disclosure Dr. Abulafia received a speaker's fee from Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Barrett has licensed the Barrett Toric Calculator to Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Koch is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., and Revision Optics, Inc. Dr. Hill is a paid consultant to Haag-Streit AG and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: IV. Rethinking astigmatism analysis for intraocular lens-based surgery: Suggested terminology, analysis, and standards for outcome reports.

TL;DR: In the January 2001 issue of JCRS, several authors described their methods for analyzing change in corneal astigmatism following laser in situ keratomileusis surgery, and several of these methods are commonly and effectively used in peerreviewed scientific studies to characterize astigmatic changes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer combined with Placido topography and agreement with 2 Scheimpflug cameras

TL;DR: The high repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer (AS-OCT) combined with Placido topography and their agreement with those provided by 2 rotating Scheimpflug cameras supports its use in clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Methodologies Using Estimated or Measured Values of Total Corneal Astigmatism for Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation.

TL;DR: The Barrett toric calculator and Abulafia-Koch formula yielded the lowest astigmatic prediction errors and direct evaluating total corneal power for toric IOL calculation was not superior to estimating it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Image-guided system versus manual marking for toric intraocular lens alignment in cataract surgery.

TL;DR: The IOL misalignment was significantly less with digital marking than with manual marking; this did not result in a better UDVA or lower residual refractive astigmatism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020

TL;DR: The group refractive index originally developed for the IOLMaster may not represent the best method to convert the optical path length into a physical distance and the issue of posterior and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) is discussed in relation to toric IOLs.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations

TL;DR: The improved accuracy of the new formula was proven by performing IOL power calculations on 2,000 eyes from 12 surgeons and comparing the results to seven other currently used formulas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism.

TL;DR: Selecting toric intraocular lenses based on anterior corneal measurements could lead to overcor correction in eyes that have with‐the‐rule astigmatism and undercorrection in eyes which have against‐the-ruleAstigmatism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism

TL;DR: Analytical methods for evaluating the results of keratorefractive surgical procedures and emphasize the importance of intraocular astigmatism and the limitations of manual keratometry are demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses: Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism

TL;DR: Corneal astigmatism was overestimated in WTR by all devices and underestimated in ATR by all except the Placido–dual Scheimpflug analyzer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Foldable toric intraocular lens for astigmatism correction in cataract patients.

TL;DR: The results indicate that phacoemulsification and posterior chamber AcrySof toric IOL implantation is an effective option to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract surgery.
Related Papers (5)