scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Emission reduction activities in private households: Development of evaluation criteria and an application to the transport sector : working paper

TLDR
Off4Firms as mentioned in this paper is an applied research and innovation project aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of private households, where firms can evaluate measures aiming at reductions in energy use and CO2 emissions in their employees' private lives.
Abstract
.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Evaluation criteria for reduction activities ...................................................................................................... 7 2. 2.1. Technical reduction potential ................................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Cost efficiency of the reduction activities ........................................................................................... 12 2.3. Verifiability of the CO2 emissions and energy consumption reductions ............................................. 13 2.4. Implementation barriers ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.5. Concluding remarks ............................................................................................................................. 18 Exemplary evaluation of reduction activities in transportation.................................................................... 19 3. 3.1. Purchase of new cars ........................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1. Baseline definition ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.2. Technical reduction potential ......................................................................................................... 21 3.1.3. Cost efficiency ................................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.4. Verifiability ...................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.5. Implementation barriers ................................................................................................................. 29 3.1.6. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 31 3.2. Choice of transportation means .......................................................................................................... 32 3.2.1. Baseline definition ........................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2. Technical reduction potential ......................................................................................................... 34 3.2.3. Cost efficiency ................................................................................................................................. 36 3.2.4. Verifiability ...................................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.5. Implementation barriers ................................................................................................................. 40 3.2.6. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 42 3.3. Results and qualitative rating of reduction activities in the transport sector ..................................... 43 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 4. Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 47 5. References .................................................................................................................................................... 48 6. Annex .................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Off4Firms Working Paper D1.1. Off4Firms in a Nutshell 4 Off4Firms in a Nutshell Off4Firms – Employer-led incentives for households’ reductions in CO2 emissions and energy consumption Off4Firms is an applied research and innovation project aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of private households. The project is led by ETH Zurich (Chair of Economics, Prof. Renate Schubert) and involves project partners from academia and business: Wageningen University, South Pole Carbon, Swiss Re, and EWZ. Partially financed by EIT Climate-KIC, the project runs from April 2012 until March 2014. Being one of the world’s largest emitters, households in aggregate bear an enormous potential for reducing emissions and energy consumption. Off4Firms starts from the premise that one effective way of triggering change in households is through household members’ employers. Off4Firms creates a win-win situation for households and firms: both profit from employees saving energy and reducing CO2 in their households. Employees benefit because they change their energy-related behaviour with the support of their employer. This change pays for – for example through lower energy costs. Companies, on the other hand, benefit from reputation gains as employers and in the public. In addition, under specific conditions – they may profit from offsetting their emissions by their employees’ emission reductions. Off4Firms develops a comprehensive programme for firms to use this great potential in an efficient way. This project enables firms to evaluate measures aiming at reductions in energy use and CO2 emissions in their employees’ private lives. Evaluation criteria are the effectiveness, cost efficiency, verifiability and acceptability of measures for the employees. Best practice measures will be identified and a tool kit will be provided, enabling the development of company-tailored CO2 or energy reduction measures. These measures will be brought to scale by a dedicated business unit. In addition, the policy framework making such measures a win-win strategy for households and for firms will be depicted. Off4Firms Working Paper D1.1. Abstract

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

Risk-Aversion and Willingness to Pay For Energy Saving Measures in Residential Buildings

Mehdi Farsi
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a choice experiment to evaluate the consumers' willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in Switzerland's residential buildings, such as air renewal (ventilation) systems and insulation of windows and facades.

How firms can use psychology to create successful energy conservation interventions; A literature review

TL;DR: In this paper, a large collection of psychological effects that may influence employees' decisions to participate in corporate programs aimed at reducing energy consumption and CO2-emissions at their individual, household level is studied.

Accelerating CO2-Emission Reductions via Corporate Programmes: Analysis of an Existing Corporate Programme

TL;DR: The COYou2 Program of the company Swiss Re as mentioned in this paper allows employees to claim subsidies for the realization of various activities reducing their energy consumption and CO2-emissions at home, such as the purchase of a hybrid car, energy efficient building renovation, or installation of photovoltaic panels.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A review on buildings energy consumption information

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed available information concerning energy consumption in buildings, and particularly related to HVAC systems, and compared different types of building types and end uses in different countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of some of the relevant literature from the US offers definitions and identifies sources including direct, secondary, and economy-wide sources and concludes that the range of estimates for the size of the rebound effect is very low to moderate.

Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a collection of essays by Terry Barker, Igor Bashmakov, Lenny Bernstein, Jean Bogner, Peter Bosch, Rutu Dave, Ogunlade Davidson, Brian Fisher, Michael Grubb, Sujata Gupta, Kirsten Halsnaes, BertJan Heij, Boubacarraoui, Shigeki Kobayashi, Mark Levine, Daniel Martino, Omar Masera Cerutti, Bert Metz, Leo Meyer, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Adil Najam
Journal ArticleDOI

The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify five distinct notions of optimality: the economists' economic potential, the technologists' technical potential, hypothetical potential, narrow social optimum and true social optimum.
Related Papers (5)