scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Ethnic federalism in a dominant party state: The Ethiopian experience 1991-2000

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, an analysis of the implementation of a federal system within a dominant party state is presented, which includes examinations of both the legal and functional aspects of the federalisation process in Ethiopia.
Abstract
Since 1991, when the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front came to power, two parallel political processes have taken place in Ethiopia. Firstly, the country is restructuring into a federal system, where the regional governments are obtaining the right to self-government and representation at federal level. Secondly, the party in power is strengthening its control of the regions by creating satellite parties and including them within its centralised party structures. These processes have two fundamentally different aims. The federal system, formalised in the constitution, aims at enhancing regional autonomy from the central government, while the building of a centralised party system has the objective of concentrating the power in the hands of the party leadership at the top. This study is an analysis of the implementation of a federal system within a dominant party state. It includes examinations of both the legal and functional aspects of the federalisation process in Ethiopia. Theories on federalism and federations are used as guidelines in the exploration of literature, documents and own interview material on the implementation of the federal system. The analysis of the Ethiopian constitution and various proclamations has shown that the Ethiopian de jure model meets the requirements to be classified as federal. But the process of drafting and ratifying the constitution was totally dominated by the ruling party, and hence, the federal project lost legitimacy. The exploration of the functioning of the federal system disclosed that the federal division of power as defined in the constitution is severely undermined by the centralised party structures.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders

TL;DR: This paper analyzed interactions between smallholders and other actors to provide new perspectives on the role played by smallholder innovation networks in the agricultural sector by drawing on data from community case studies conducted in 10 localities.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Land grab’ as development strategy? The political economy of agricultural investment in Ethiopia

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the domestic political economy of so-called land-grabbing in Ethiopia, assessing the motivations of the Ethiopian government, which has strongly promoted foreign agricultural investment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States

TL;DR: The authors argue that the effect of specific federal traits (fiscal decentralization, fiscal transfers, and political co-partisanship) are conditional on a society's income level and ethnic composition.
Book ChapterDOI

4 Seed, Fertilizer, and Agricultural Extension in Ethiopia

TL;DR: In this article, the authors synthesize the lessons learned from Ethiopia's past experiences with providing smallholders with access to seed, fertilizer, and extension services, identify challenges facing the country's continuing efforts to strengthen its input systems and markets, and recommend policy solutions for the future.
References
More filters
Book

Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Robert K. Yin
TL;DR: In this article, buku ini mencakup lebih dari 50 studi kasus, memberikan perhatian untuk analisis kuantitatif, membahas lebah lengkap penggunaan desain metode campuran penelitian, and termasuk wawasan metodologi baru.
Book

Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a political-institutional theoretical framework in which the distinctive political traditions of Africa's neopatrimonial states are shown to have powerfully shaped the regime transitions, and demonstrated that economic and international forces often provided the context in which political liberalization occurred, but cannot by themselves explain the observed outcomes.