scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence-based dentistry for planning restorative treatments: barriers and potential solutions.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Assessing the barriers preventing the implementation of EBD among dental undergraduate and graduate students in Montreal finds evidence-based literature to be the most reliable source of information for restorative treatment planning, however, only 16%.
Abstract
Introduction Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) can help provide the best treatment option for every patient, however, its implementation in restorative dentistry is very limited. Objective This study aimed at assessing the barriers preventing the implementation of EBD among dental undergraduate and graduate students in Montreal, and explore possible solutions to overcome these barriers. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted by means of a paper format self-administrated questionnaire distributed among dental students. The survey assessed the barriers and potential solutions for implementation of an evidence-based practice. Results Sixty-one students completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of respondents found evidence-based literature to be the most reliable source of information for restorative treatment planning, however, only 16% used it. They considered that finding reliable information was difficult and they sometimes encountered conflicting information when consulting different sources. Dental students had positive attitudes towards the need for better access to evidence-based literature to assist learning and decision making in restorative treatment planning and to improve treatment outcomes. Even for dentists trained in EBD, online searching takes too much time, and even though it can provide information of better quality than personal intuition, it might not be enough to identify the best available evidence. Conclusions Even though dental students are aware of the importance of EBD in restorative dentistry they rarely apply the concept, mainly due to time constraints. For this reason, implementation of EBD would probably require faster access to evidence-based knowledge.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical performance of zirconia implants: A meta-review.

TL;DR: Based on this meta-review, in spite of short-term promising results of zirconia implants, evidence with long term evidence is lacking and the overall AMSTAR's quality of these reports was moderate.
Journal ArticleDOI

In Vivo and In Vitro Effectiveness of Rotary Nickel-Titanium vs Manual Stainless Steel Instruments for Root Canal Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TL;DR: The results of this systematic review suggested that NiTi rotary instruments were associated with lower canal transportation and apical extrusion when compared to SST hand files, whereas both groups had similar outcomes in terms of success of therapy, amount of residual bacteria, and cleansing ability after treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review.

TL;DR: The current evidence suggested that the failure rates of the treatments may depend on the amount of remaining tooth structure and type of treatment, and post-retained crowns were associated with the most favourable outcome in teeth with one to two remaining coronal tooth wall(s), whereas post-free crownswere superior when greater tooth structure was available.
Journal ArticleDOI

From dental science to clinical practice: Knowledge translation and evidence-based dentistry principles.

TL;DR: This literature review aims to revisit the concepts of knowledge translation and evidence-based dentistry and depict their role and influence within dental education, and addresses some possible strategies to facilitate knowledge translation (KT) and encourage dental students to use EBD principles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review

TL;DR: Insufficient high‐quality data are available to support one restorative treatment or material over another for the restoration of vital posterior teeth, however, the current evidence suggests that the failure rates of treatments may depend on the amount of remaining tooth structure and types of treatment.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: criteria and technique considerations.

TL;DR: The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is often required and may represent a challenge as there is no consensus on ideal treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Longitudinal comparison of factors influencing choice of dental treatment by private general practitioners

TL;DR: The treatment choice responses showed a high degree of stability over time across all age groups of dentists, suggesting that if routines are developed these are established before or soon after graduation as a dentist.
Journal ArticleDOI

A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: III: How to appraise and use an article about therapy

TL;DR: Dentists who wish to inform their clinical decisions regarding therapy and prevention questions can use these guidelines to decide what type of studies to search, define the specific question of interest to search efficiently for these studies, and critically appraise an article about therapy or prevention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge and attitude of dental faculty members towards evidence-based dentistry in Iran.

TL;DR: This study suggests that the level of actual knowledge of dental faculties about basic principles of EBD was moderate in Iran, however, faculties' overall interest and positive attitude towards learning EBD is encouraging, and it is highly recommended that degree/certificate continuing educational programmes be planned by the organising committees.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research utilization among dental hygienists in Sweden--a national survey.

TL;DR: The conclusions are that the length of dental hygiene education is a key factor influencing the application of research findings to practice, and one-year education appears to be inadequate to achieve evidence-based practice.