Journal ArticleDOI
Expressed and Inventoried Vocational Interests: A Comparison of Instruments.
Reads0
Chats0
About:
This article is published in Journal of Counseling Psychology.The article was published on 1978-11-01. It has received 65 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Vocational education.read more
Citations
More filters
Emotional and Personality-Related Aspects of Career-Decision-Making DifficultiesSaka
Itamar Gati,Kevin R. Kelly +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a theoretical framework for analyzing the emotional and personality-related aspects of career decision-making difficulties, which is comprised of three major clusters: pessimistic views, anxiety and self-concept and identity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Emotional and Personality-Related Aspects of Career-Decision-Making Difficulties:
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a theoretical framework for analyzing the emotional and personality-related aspects of career decision-making difficulties and proposed a model comprised of three types of variables.
Journal ArticleDOI
Expressed vocational choice and vocational indecision.
TL;DR: The authors found that females were more congruent and satisfied with their college majors compared to males, and significant differences were found on congruence with college major, total number of Vocational Preference Inventory responses, and scales measuring satisfaction with the college major and career choice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dysfunctional Thinking and Difficulties in Career Decision Making
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relationship between two measures of career readiness and difficulties, the Career Thoughts Inventory (CTI) and the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ), as well as the relations between these measures and the individual's degree of decidedness regarding his or her career plans.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a procedure for having two or more judges independently categorize a sample of units and determine the degree, significance, and significance of the units. But they do not discuss the extent to which these judgments are reproducible, i.e., reliable.