Book ChapterDOI
Freedom of Expression at the Private University 1
John Hasnas,John Hasnas +1 more
TLDR
In this paper, the authors argue that private universities have a duty to act with integrity, which means that they must fully honor the public representations it makes to its students and faculty.Abstract:
Private universities are not bound by the First Amendment, which restrains
only state action. This leaves them free to adopt whatever restrictions on
freedom of expression they deem consistent with their mission. However,
private universities a have duty to act with integrity, which means that
they must fully honor the public representations it makes to its students
and faculty. This implies that private universities must refrain from making
conflicting representations that cannot be simultaneously fulfilled. Most
universities represent themselves as committed to both free of expression on
campus and to providing an inclusive and welcoming educational environment
for people of all backgrounds. However, the expression of certain ideas can
offend some members of the university community and make them feel
unwelcome. This creates a situation in which it is difficult, if not
impossible, for the university to live up to both of its representations. I
argue that this implies that private universities are ethically obligated to
specify which of these two conflicting obligations it considers more
important—which one will trump the other in case of conflict.
I further argue that private universities that resolve this situation by
giving priority to freedom of expression implicitly assume two further
obligations: (1) to adopt a policy stating that no member of the academic
community will be subject to investigation for an academic infraction solely
on the basis of the ideas that they express, and (2) to revise their
harassment policies to reflect this commitment. This is because a commitment
to freedom of expression entails a commitment to eschew policies that have a
“chilling effect” on expression. In the current academic
environment, free speech is suppressed not by the conviction and punishment
for academic infractions, but by the threat of being investigated for such
infractions, especially for violating the university’s harassment
policy. Thus, a commitment to freedom of expression requires revising
university harassment policies to bar investigations based on the content of
purely verbal or written expression.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Academic Freedom as a Defensive Right
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors analyse the legal regulations and the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Germany, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, and Spain to identify who is the holder of academic freedom, how the defensive function of academicfreedom works and what academic activities are being protected.