scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Galileo’s Discovery of the Moons Orbiting Jupiter Based on Abductive Inference Strategies

TLDR
A noble and refined model for abduction inference is proposed and its validity is shown by applying to the inferential process of “Galileo’s discovery of the moons of Jupiter”, with historically considered evidence.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to understand the scientific inferential processes of Galileo’s discovery of Jupiter’s moons. Abductive reasoning has played very important roles in producing creative leaps and breakthrough for scientific discovery in history of science. This article presents a scientific procedure that involves abductive inference in general. And we propose a noble and refined model for abduction inference and show its validity by applying to the inferential process of “Galileo’s discovery of the moons of Jupiter”, with historically considered evidence. It makes three broad macro perspectives; rather than only hypothetico-deductive method, (1) “fixed stars hypothesis suspected”, (2) Moon hypothesis can be suggested and selected by abductive strategies, (3) Moon hypothesis expansion.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Foundations of Scientific Inference.

TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive survey of the philosophical problems of probablity and induction is presented, and a variety of traditional and contemporary ways of dealing with this problem are considered.
References
More filters
Book

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

TL;DR: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions as discussed by the authors is a seminal work in the history of science and philosophy of science, and it has been widely cited as a major source of inspiration for the present generation of scientists.
Book ChapterDOI

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Imre Lakatos
TL;DR: For centuries knowledge meant proven knowledge, proven either by the power of the intellect or by the evidence of the senses as discussed by the authors. But the notion of proven knowledge was questioned by the sceptics more than two thousand years ago; but they were browbeaten into confusion by the glory of Newtonian physics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge

TL;DR: The distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water as mentioned in this papereyerabend, T. S. Kuhn and T. E. Toulmin have made a distinction between the two categories of science.