scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Handling Covariates in the Design of Clinical Trials.

William F. Rosenberger, +1 more
- 01 Aug 2008 - 
- Vol. 23, Iss: 3, pp 404-419
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A new class of procedures, covariate-adjusted response adaptive (CARA) randomization procedures that attempt to optimize both efficiency and ethical considerations, while maintaining randomization are advocated.
Abstract
There has been a split in the statistics community about the need for taking covariates into account in the design phase of a clinical trial. There are many advocates of using stratification and covariate-adaptive randomization to promote balance on certain known covariates. However, balance does not always promote efficiency or ensure more patients are assigned to the better treatment. We describe these procedures, including model-based procedures, for incorporating covariates into the design of clinical trials, and give examples where balance, efficiency and ethical considerations may be in conflict. We advocate a new class of procedures, covariate-adjusted response-adaptive (CARA) randomization procedures that attempt to optimize both efficiency and ethical considerations, while maintaining randomization. We review all these procedures, present a few new simulation studies, and conclude with our philosophy.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that covariate data are available before units are exposed to treatments and can be used to check covariate balance before the physical experiment takes place, provided a precise definition of imbalance has been specified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities

TL;DR: This work focuses on the design principles and research issues that lead to particular designs being appealing or unappealing in particular applications, and describes a number of current barriers and suggestions for overcoming them in order to promote wider use of appropriate adaptive designs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that if covariate data are available before units are exposed to treatments, these chance imbalances can be mitigated by first checking covariate balance before the physical experiment takes place.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study.

TL;DR: Across a range of correlations between pre- and post-treatment scores and at varying levels and direction of baseline imbalance, ANCOVA remains the optimum statistical method for the analysis of continuous outcomes in RCTs, in terms of bias, precision and statistical power.
Journal ArticleDOI

Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review

TL;DR: The advantages and limitations of different allocation techniques, including stratification, matching, minimization, and covariate-constrained randomization are reviewed as they pertain to C-RCTs to provide investigators with guidance for choosing the best allocation technique for their trial.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.

Stuart J. Pocock, +1 more
- 01 Mar 1975 - 
TL;DR: A new general procedure for treatment assignment is described which concentrates on minimizing imbalance in the distributions of treatment numbers within the levels of each individual prognostic factor.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Equivalence of Two Extremum Problems

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the problem of defining probability measures with finite support, i.e., measures that assign probability one to a set consisting of a finite number of points.
Journal ArticleDOI

Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced

TL;DR: In this paper, a new method of assigning the subjects which tends to balance the experiment, but at the same time is not over vulnerable to various common forms of experimental bias is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups

TL;DR: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups to minimize differences between the groups, not only in the number of patients but in patient characteristics is described, demonstrating a four‐ to fivefold reduction of the probability of severe imbalance, relative to randomization.
Journal ArticleDOI

The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review

TL;DR: From the evidence presented in this review, it is believed that minimization to be a highly effective allocation method and recommend its wider adoption in the conduct of randomized controlled trials.