scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Heterodox Economic Thinking and Public Policy

Joseph Dorfman
- 01 Mar 1970 - 
- Vol. 4, Iss: 1, pp 1-22
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The belief that collective action is essential not only for the maintenance of the rights of man summed up in the term "individualism," but also to provide the best opportunities for their development through economic growth and a more equitable distribution of wealth and income is almost a cliche as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
That current American economic policy is founded in a faith in the efficacy of collective action, or more loosely, the welfare state, is almost a cliche. By collective action I am not merely referring to government but also the functioning of a host of highly organized public institutions, such as the corporation, the security and commodity exchanges, the church, the school, and the trade union. But what sets the state apart from the other institutions is its role as the ultimate arbiter of disputes backed by the physical force to maintain law and order. National economic policy over the past four decades gives ample testimony to the belief that collective action is essential, not only for the maintenance of the rights of man summed up in the term "individualism," but also to provide the best opportunities for their development through economic growth and a more equitable distribution of wealth and income. Thus, by now, for the vast majority of the American people, the basic decision of social policy has been made; namely, that collective action must be both positive and pervasive. While even the most conservative today accept a degree of government intervention that would have been decried a few generations ago, there are, of course, substantial differences of opinion as to the limits, pace, and emphasis of such action. The shift in attitude toward the role of government which began after the Civil War accompanied many radically new problems which, in large part, were not amenable to solution within the framework of orthodox economic thinking. Thus, the heterodox writer, less fettered by the dogma and preconceptions of the past,

read more

Citations
More filters

The great depression in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: revisiting vulnerabilities and policies

TL;DR: Gerona and Sosa as discussed by the authors conducted an analysis of the Great Depression (1928-1934) in a sample of three highly interconnected South American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay (ABU).
Journal ArticleDOI

Karl Polanyi's Institutional Theory: Market Society and Its "Disembedded" Economy

TL;DR: A fundamental principle of Karl Polanyi's institutional outlook is that any economic system has to be considered as a whole and as a historically specific social organization as mentioned in this paper, and this principle implie...
Posted Content

The Social Provisioning Process and Heterodox Economics

TL;DR: The social provisioning process is how heterodox economists define economics in general as discussed by the authors, and it has been argued that such an expansive definition of economics has potential to synthesize various heterodox theoretical frameworks in a constructive manner.
Journal ArticleDOI

Socio‐Economic Systems

TL;DR: In this paper, a discussion of the meaning, method-dology and rationale of the socio-economic approach is presented, focusing on trying to stimulate discussion about the following questions:
Book ChapterDOI

Introduction: Frederic S. Lee’s contributions to heterodox economics

TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight Frederic Lee's contributions to heterodox economics in terms of theory and community, which should be acknowledged and carried on by those who are concerned with the advancement of heterodox economic as an alternative critical theory to the status quo.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent Developments in Economics

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a methodology for welfare economics based on the theory of the firm and the economics of growth, which they call Welfare Economics of Growth (WEG).
Journal ArticleDOI

Foster and Catchings: A Reappraisal

TL;DR: The business cycle theories of William T. Foster and Waddill Catchings have been subjected to frequent analysis and vigorous criticisms as mentioned in this paper, and they were classed among the economic heretics who had dared assault the classical fortress of Say's Law.
Related Papers (5)