Historia del movimiento obrero boliviano, 1848-1900
Reads0
Chats0
About:
This article is published in Americas.The article was published on 1970-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 7 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Book
The Legal Foundations of Inequality: Constitutionalism in the Americas, 1776-1860
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define conservative as "the moral cement of society", and liberalism as "between tyranny and anarchy" and "the quest for equality" in the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI
Personalidade jurídica e cidadania coletiva na Bolívia: uma etnografia da identificação jurídica e a formação de espaços públicos
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that during the neoliberal period in Bolivia, a series of policies oriented towards restructuring of the state deepened the collective dimension of citizenship as both status and participation, with the certificate of incorporation as the maximum symbolic expression.
Journal ArticleDOI
El estado y los dos socialismos. crítica anarquista del marxismo pensada para américa latina
TL;DR: In el presente artículo retomamos el tema del con-flicto entre los dos socialismos: el libertario and el autoritario, alrededor de la cuestión estatal, pero extensible a otros aspectos como la organización social as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Impact of the Catavi Mine Massacre of 1942 on Bolivian Politics and Public Opinion
TL;DR: On the windswept heights near the Bolivian mining camp of Catavi on December 21, 1942, in the center of a rocky lunar landscape which dwarfs man but enlarges his passions, a mass of Indian and mestizo tin miners and their families, some 8,000 strong, trudged stubbornly down a road toward an emplacement of 700 troops and Carabineros watching them through the sights of machine guns, rifles and a trench mortar as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
«Todos somos iguales». La Revolución de la Igualdad en Santa Cruz, Bolivia. 1876-1877
TL;DR: The Equality Revolution in Santa Cruz (1876-1877) as mentioned in this paper was a conflict between the common urban class and local elites who defended a development formula that championed a modern age that balanced the social values of the traditional and patriarchal society, and other local elite who benefited from the boom of free-market capitalism.