scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

How to evaluate intraexaminer reliability using an interexaminer reliability study design.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A statistical method is presented that permits the investigator to compute intraexaminer as well as interexaminer reliability and precision from the findings of an intereXaminer reliability investigation.
About
This article is published in Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.The article was published on 1995-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 20 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Reliability (statistics) & Intra-rater reliability.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Overall, inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of segmental intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine was poor to fair and most studies were found to be of poor methodological quality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation

TL;DR: Investigation of the reproducibility and repeatability of three groups of physiotherapists in locating three randomly selected spinal levels by palpation found Clinicians and MTs were more reproducible than students, and located similar levels, but good repeatability within therapists was indicated.
Journal ArticleDOI

An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.

TL;DR: The use of a new, realistic, 'gold standard', the congenital block vertebra (CBV) is introduced and substantial agreement achieved lends support to the validity of motion palpation in detecting major spinal fixations in the cervical spine.
Journal ArticleDOI

The reliability of musculoskeletal screening tests used in cricket.

TL;DR: Only the ankle dorsiflexion lunge, combined elevation test, calf heel raise test and prone four point hold have acceptable reliability when there are multiple physiotherapists recording measurements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability of clinical tests in the assessment of patients with neck/shoulder problems-impact of history.

TL;DR: Reliability of clinical tests was poor or fair in several categories and did not alter with history, but the sensitivity test was the most reliable and also exempt from bias and should be studied further.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How do we evaluate the reliability of results obtained from LSC techniques?

The paper provides a statistical method to evaluate both interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability, which can be applied to various types of data.