scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Indian guidelines for indications and timing of intervention for common congenital heart diseases: Revised and updated consensus statement of the Working group on management of congenital heart diseases

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Evidence-based recommendations are provided for indications and timing of intervention in common CHD, including left-to-right shunts, obstructive lesions, and cyanotic CHD; and guidelines are given on indications for implantation of permanent pacemakers in children.
Abstract
A number of guidelines are available for the management of congenital heart diseases (CHD) from infancy to adult life. However, these guidelines are for patients living in high-income countries. Separate guidelines, applicable to Indian children, are required when recommending an intervention for CHD, as often these patients present late in the course of the disease and may have coexisting morbidities and malnutrition. Guidelines emerged following expert deliberations at the National Consensus Meeting on Management of Congenital Heart Diseases in India, held on August 10 and 11, 2018, at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences. The meeting was supported by Children's HeartLink, a nongovernmental organization based in Minnesota, USA. The aim of the study was to frame evidence-based guidelines for (i) indications and optimal timing of intervention in common CHD; (ii) follow-up protocols for patients who have undergone cardiac surgery/catheter interventions for CHD; and (iii) indications for use of pacemakers in children. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for indications and timing of intervention in common CHD, including left-to-right shunts (atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, atrioventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, and others), obstructive lesions (pulmonary stenosis, aortic stenosis, and coarctation of aorta), and cyanotic CHD (tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, univentricular hearts, total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, Ebstein's anomaly, and others). In addition, protocols for follow-up of postsurgical patients are also described, disease wise. Guidelines are also given on indications for implantation of permanent pacemakers in children.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book Chapter

Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease

TL;DR: 'While acute rheumatic fever has become a rare curiosity in Australia’s non-Indigenous population, its incidence in Indigenous Australians living in remote areas remains among the highest reported in the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Recognition of Congenital Heart Disease

Kurt Amplatz
- 01 May 1971 - 
Journal ArticleDOI

Perioperative care of the newborns with CHDs in the time of COVID-19.

TL;DR: The COVID-19-specific perioperative management issues for newborns with CHD are summarized by combining available data from the perspectives of neonatology and paediatric cardiovascular surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Delayed diagnosis in children with congenital heart disease: a mixed-method study.

TL;DR: In this article, a prospective cohort study with mixed-methods was conducted in Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia to determine the proportion of delayed diagnosis of CHD and factors related to the delayed diagnosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Diagnostic Approach to Congenital Acyanotic Congenital Heart Disease in Infants and Children.

TL;DR: Careful clinical assessment of features of high pulmonary blood flow, presence of absence of systemic desaturation, status of second heart sound and murmur would help to arrive at a reasonable bedside diagnosis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The incidence of congenital heart disease

TL;DR: The causes of variation are determined, there is no evidence for differences in incidence in different countries or times, and the incidences of individual major forms of CHD were determined from 44 studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010).

TL;DR: Experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition, including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio.