scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Inter- and intra-rater reliability for classification of medication related events in paediatric inpatients.

TLDR
Trained reviewers can reliably assess paediatric inpatient medication related events for the presence of an ADE and for its seriousness and preventability, according to a decision algorithm and six point scale.
Abstract
Background: In medication safety research studies medication related events are often classified by type, seriousness, and degree of preventability, but there is currently no universally reliable “gold standard” approach. The reliability (reproducibility) of this process is important as the targeting of prevention strategies is often based on specific categories of event. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of reviewer judgements regarding classification of paediatric inpatient medication related events. Methods: Three health professionals independently reviewed suspected medication related events and classified them by type (adverse drug event (ADE), potential ADE, medication error, rule violation, or other event). ADEs and potential ADEs were then rated according to seriousness of patient injury using a seven point scale and preventability using a decision algorithm and a six point scale. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were calculated using the kappa (κ) statistic. Results: Agreement between all three reviewers regarding event type ranged from “slight” for potential ADEs (κ = 0.20, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.40) to “substantial” agreement for the presence of an ADE (κ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.77). Agreement ranged from “slight” (κ = 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.10) to “fair” (κ = 0.34, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.38) for seriousness classifications but, by collapsing the seven categories into serious versus not serious, “moderate” agreement was found (κ = 0.50, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.54). For preventability decision, overall agreement was “fair” (κ = 0.37, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.41) but “moderate” for not preventable events (κ = 0.47, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.51). Conclusion: Trained reviewers can reliably assess paediatric inpatient medication related events for the presence of an ADE and for its seriousness. Assessments of preventability appeared to be a more difficult judgement in children and approaches that improve reliability would be useful.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Extent, nature and consequences of adverse events: results of a retrospective casenote review in a large NHS hospital

TL;DR: It is confirmed that adverse events are common, serious and potentially preventable source of harm to patients in NHS hospitals and the accuracy and reliability of a structured two-stage casenote review in identifying adverse events in the UK was confirmed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study

TL;DR: There are many opportunities to reduce harm affecting children in hospital in Canada, particularly related to surgery, intensive care and diagnostic error, but adverse events in the former are less likely to be preventable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study.

TL;DR: ADEs represent a considerable hazard for the pediatric inpatient population and ADEs represent a large cost imposition upon the healthcare sector, highlighting the importance of developing strategies to prevent and ameliorate ADEs.
Journal ArticleDOI

NICU medication errors: identifying a risk profile for medication errors in the neonatal intensive care unit

TL;DR: Risk factors for harmful medication error reports include use of ISMP High-Alert Medications, the prescribing phase of the medication use process, and failure of equipment/delivery devices.
Journal ArticleDOI

The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record

TL;DR: A record review process with two physicians per record including a consensus procedure to assess AEs is not more reliable than a record reviewprocess with one physician.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

TL;DR: A general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies is presented and tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interob server agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention

TL;DR: Adverse drug events were common and often preventable; serious ADEs were more likely to be preventable and prevention strategies should target both stages of the drug delivery process.
Book

Basic and Clinical Biostatistics

TL;DR: Here is absolutely everything medical students need to know about biostatistics and quantitative methods as applied to medicine, clinical practice, and research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.

TL;DR: Medication errors are common in pediatric inpatient settings, and further efforts are needed to reduce them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events

TL;DR: Medication errors are common, although relatively few result in ADEs, however, those that do are preventable, many through physician computer order entry.
Related Papers (5)