scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

International Bureaucracy: The Myth and Reality of the International Civil Service

Thomas G. Weiss
- 01 Apr 1982 - 
- Vol. 58, Iss: 2, pp 287-306
TLDR
The authors examines the theory of the international civil service and the reality of the supra-national staff who are charged with the day-to-day responsibility for international co-operation, and concludes that these same institutions and personnel are increasingly involved in the discussion on numerous issues of importance for the citizens of these countries-hostages in Iran, international economic relations, and the status of refugees in South East Asia.
Abstract
REACTIONS in developed countries to the United Nations system and the officials who staff it are indifferent at best and outright hostile at worst. Ironically, these same institutions and personnel are increasingly involved in the discussion on numerous issues of importance for the citizens of these countries-hostages in Iran, international economic relations, and the status of refugees in South East Asia are recent examples. This article examines the theory of the international civil service and the reality of the supra-national staff who are charged with the day-to-day responsibility for international co-operation. Although international organisations have traditionally been of marginal interest to scholars and national decision-makers not directly connected with the study or operation of international institutions, the situation has significantly changed during the last two decades. Decolonisation led to the rapid expansion of United Nations membership in the 1960s; and raw materials prices and shortages during the 1970s helped developing countries to assert their positions as active members of the international system in which they emphasised the work of the United Nations more than did established, economically developed states. The recognition of new problems and the rush to erect new rhetorical or institutional responses have so far monopolised analytical attention whilst the administrative aspects of these international bureaucracies have tended to be overlooked.'

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and their Networks

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify new public spaces where global policies occur, referred to as the global agora, and adapt the conventional policy cycle heuristic by conceptually stretching it to the global and regional levels to reveal the higher degree of pluralization of actors and multiple-authority structures than is the case at national levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission

TL;DR: The authors proposed a neo-institutionalist perspective on the European Commission based on two lines of internal conflict: the Commission's need to be accountable simultaneously to the member states and to "the citizens" ('multiple accountability') and its dual function of providing executive government and public administration ('politicized bureaucracy') for the European polity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does Bureaucracy Really Matter? The Authority of Intergovernmental Treaty Secretariats in Global Environmental Politics

TL;DR: Although a number of scholars acknowledge the relevance of intergovernmental bureaucracies in world politics, International Relations research still lacks theoretical distinction and empirical scru... as mentioned in this paper, the authors of this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Design and Bureaucrats’ Impact on Political Control

TL;DR: The authors argue that the more proactive the design activities of international bureaucrats, the more insulated the resulting institution will be from mechanisms of state control (e.g., financial monopolization or veto power). Statistical analyses of an original dataset support the prediction and are robust to alternative specifications as well as approaches to control for endogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: international bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a taxonomy of cooperative, co-optative, competitive, or conflictual relations between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and international bureaucracies, showing how different mixes of resources and values help to explain why FAO bureaucrats have cycled through different relationships with NGOs.
Related Papers (5)