scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

International relations between war and revolution: Wilsonian diplomacy and the making of the Treaty of Versailles

Alexander Anievas
- 30 Sep 2014 - 
- Vol. 51, Iss: 5, pp 619-647
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A critique of standard IR interpretations of Wilsonian diplomacy at Versailles, illustrating how realist and liberals' uncritical acceptance of Wilson as the quintessential ‘idealist-liberal’ statesman glosses over a core contradiction at the heart of WilsonIAN diplomacy: the wielding of power politics to transcend power politics.
Abstract
The Peace Treaties of 1919 retain a prominent place within the study of International Relations (IR).The theoretical significance of Versailles for IR can hardly be overstated. For much rests on the question of whether the post-war settlement was problematic due to its liberal nature or in spite of it. Yet, explanations as to why Versailles diplomacy was so problematic vary significantly. What were the central factors affecting policymaking at Versailles? And what does Paris Peace diplomacy tell IR theory about modern foreign policymaking processes? This article provides a critique of standard IR interpretations of Wilsonian diplomacy at Versailles, illustrating how realist and liberals’ uncritical acceptance of Wilson as the quintessential ‘idealist-liberal’ statesman glosses over a core contradiction at the heart of Wilsonian diplomacy: the wielding of power politics to transcend power politics. In doing so, it examines the effects of the Bolshevik revolution as a paradigm-rupturing event transforming the nature and dynamics of the First World War and the post-war settlement. This traces the unique sociological patterns of uneven and combined development thrown up by the war and the geopolitical problems this created for Wilson and the Allies in forging a new international order.

read more

Citations
More filters

Historical sociology and world history: uneven and combined development over the longue durée

TL;DR: The concept of "uneven and combined development" was originally coined by Leon Trotsky to theorise Tsarist Russia's distinctive experience of modernity and revolution and has been critically and creatively deployed in two main areas: the provision of a sociological foundation to international theory overcoming the chronic schism between sociological and geopolitical modes of enquiry; and, relatedly, in superseding prevailing Eurocentric approaches in the social sciences.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Tragedy of American Diplomacy

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the ways in which ideology and political economy intertwined over time to propel American expansion and empire in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and show that the interests and beliefs that once sent American troops into Texas and California, or Latin America and East Asia, also propelled American forces into Iraq.
Journal ArticleDOI

Revolting Times@@@Safe for Democracy: The Anglo-American Response to Revolution, 1913-1923.

TL;DR: The authors explored the collective impact on the western democracies of the revolutions that swept Mexico in 1910, China in 1911, and especially Russia in 1917, focusing on two key figures -Woodrow Wilson and Lloyd George.
Journal ArticleDOI

Violence to Velvet: Revolutions—1917 to 2017

Roger D. Markwick
- 01 Jan 2017 - 
TL;DR: A closer examination of the 1917 Russian Revolution reveals violence was not its defining feature as discussed by the authors, and the Bolsheviks conceived October as the opening salvo of international, socialist revolution; expectations largely crushed by overwhelming counter-revolutionary violence.
References
More filters
Book

Capital; A Critique of Political Economy

Karl Marx
TL;DR: In the third volume of "Das Kapital" as discussed by the authors, Marx argues that any market economy is inevitably doomed to endure a series of worsening, explosive crises leading finally to complete collapse.
Book

After Victory : Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars

TL;DR: Ikenberry as mentioned in this paper argues that the United States' ability to make commitments and restrain power is crucial for building stable and cooperative relations among industrial democracies. And he argues that only with the spread of democracy in the twentieth century and the innovative use of international institutions has order been created that goes beyond balance of power politics to exhibit constitutional characteristics.
Book

Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World

Bruce Russett
TL;DR: By illuminating the conflict-resolving mechanisms inherent in the relationships between democracies, Bruce Russett explains one of the most promising developments of the modern international system: the striking fact that the democracies that it comprises have almost never fought each other as mentioned in this paper.
Book

Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract: Foreword to the 2018 Anniversary Edition, by Stephen M. Walt Preface to the 2001 Edition Preface to the 1959 Edition 1. Introduction 2. The First Image: International Conflict and Human Behavior 3. Some Implications of the First Image: The Behavioral Sciences and the Reduction of Interstate Violence 4. The Second Image: International Conflict and the Internal Structure of States 5. Some Implications of the Second Image: International Socialism and the Coming of the First World War 6. The Third Image: International Conflict and International Anarchy 7. Some Implications of the Third Image: Examples from Economics, Politics, and History 8. Conclusion Bibliography Index
Journal ArticleDOI

Man, The State and War: A Theoretical Analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, Fox discusses the relationship between international conflict and human behavior, including the Behavioral Sciences and the reduction of Interstate Violence, International Conflict and the Internal Structure of States, International Socialism and the Coming of the First World War.