/pdf/the-role-of-agriculture-in-economic-development-gkw3h4lxhf.pdf

Investing in development – a corporate view

The role of agriculture in economic development

Introduction A NEW component of foreign direct investment (FDI) is beginning to be recognized in some Less Developed Countries (LDCs). As LDCs develop, and as some LDCs form local common markets, firms based in one LDC are beginning to make substantial direct investments in the modern manufacturing sector of neighbouring LD Cs [23]. Until recently, studies of FDI in LDCs have either ignored these LDC firms, or lumped them together with other multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 This paper examines multinational enterprises which invested in Thailand whose parent firm was located in an LD C and tentatively draws some general conclusions about the characteristics of LDC investments there.3 Many LDCs have followed a development policy of rapid, importsubstituting industrialization. To try to achieve growth in industrial output, they have encouraged investment by MNEs to provide capital, technology, managerial skills, and access to foreign markets. The costs to the host country of this investment are sometimes quite high and may include loss of control of the local economy, cultural dependence, eventual capital and profit repatriation, monopoly profits accruing to foreign firms, the use of 'inappropriate technology', and the production of goods which are inappropriate to the income level of the majority of the population [18]. These conflicts between the host country and foreign investors have been extensively examined in the literature [16, 22]. Over time, many LDCs have begun to emphasize the costs and question the benefits of foreign direct investment. Some LDCs have imposed restrictions on some types of foreign investment, some have banned it entirely. But should the policies of LDCs be the same toward all firms from all countries? Crookell [5] has argued that LD Cs should differentiate between types of foreign investment based on whether the firm is oriented toward exports or toward engaging in local market development. Is it useful for the host LDC to distinguish between foreign investment based on the home country of the parent firm?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2662608

Direct investment by firms from less developed countries 1

background

https://www.ukm.my/ipi/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/38.2007reducing-climate-change-impact-on-agriculture.pdf

Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: Global and regional effects of mitigation, 2000–2080

/pdf/pathways-to-change-improving-the-quality-of-education-in-1xv4u2ustw.pdf

Pathways to Change: Improving the Quality of Education in Developing Countries. World Bank Discussion Papers 53.

The present study contributes to the search for a methodology for land use analysis, aiming at a land use that provides sufficient (and rising) incomes to the agricultural population and at the same time maintains the productive capacity of land. The contribution focuses in particular on the role of economic analysis. The study starts with a review of land evaluation and land use planning from an economic angle, providing suggestions for improvement. After a brief examination of prospects for agricultural production and population growth, and problems of land degradation, the concept of sustainable development is discussed. The study opts for a definition of Pearce & Turner (1990). In conjunction with rules for resource use, this definition can be made operational for land use analysis. Reviewing theories of resource economics, it is concluded that these theories are relevant and provide 'food for thought', but lack direct or easy applicability to practical cases of land use analysis. Concepts of cost-benefit analysis and of farm management, production economics and household economics are more directly applicable to land use questions. Other important concepts originate from regional economics, or point to institutional problems, in particular questions around land tenure and contradictions between land users. 'Unsolved' problems within the discipline of economics, should caution against undue belief in the approximation of reality of the results. The role of economics within land use analysis is outlined. The background to this outline is formed by a skeleton model of the agricultural sector, concepts of regional agricultural planning, in particular a comprehensive resource based approach, and the socalled LEFSA sequence for land use planning. The basic idea is to distinguish levels of analysis and to consider the analyses made by several disciplines (including agronomy, soil science and economics) at each of these levels. Furthermore, at each of these levels models can be designed, which are connected in a modular fashion and which foster multi- or interdisciplinary collaboration. It is advocated that the term land use planning be replaced by land use analysis. Linear programming models as a tool for land use analysis are discussed. A linear programming model for a case study, the Neguev settlement in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica, is presented. The matrix of the model includes five sub-matrices each encompassing a different farm type. The farm types are distinguished on the basis of land-labour ratios, considering three soil types. Land use activities are included in the form of Land Use Systems & Technologies. These represent land use systems with fixed input-output coefficients. Two indicators for sustainability are taken into account: soil nutrient depletion and biocide use. These are built into the model via constraints, marking upper limits to the use of renewable resources and to the waste flow into the environment. The linear programming model forms part of the USTED ( UsoSostenible de Tierras En el Desarrollo) methodology for land use analysis. Several land use scenarios are analysed to assess whether incomes of farms can increase through an improved, more sustainable, land use. A base scenario is calculated to serve as a reference for assessing the impact of policy measures or changing socioeconomic conditions. A striking feature of the base scenario is the large area with palm heart in comparison to the actual area. Doubling the biocide price hardly affects its use, while a quantitative restriction on the use of biocides to half the amount used in the base scenario reduces average incomes by less than 1%. When soil nutrient depletion is restricted to 'critical losses' per year over a ten year period, average incomes are reduced by less than 3%. Other scenarios concern the impact of decreasing palm heart prices, the influence of increasing wages and the role of the discount rate. Given a certain structure of land use types and land units, land use is determined by the costs and availabilities of other factors than land; in the Neguev case labour.

Investing in development – a corporate view

Citations

The role of agriculture in economic development

Direct investment by firms from less developed countries 1

Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: Global and regional effects of mitigation, 2000–2080

Pathways to Change: Improving the Quality of Education in Developing Countries. World Bank Discussion Papers 53.

Farming in a fragile future : economics of land use with applications in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica

Related Papers (5)

Social investing: the role of corporate social performance in investment decisions

Misaki Capital and Sangetsu Corporation

The Business of Impact Investing: From Philanthropy to Strategy

Attracting Traditional Investors to Impact Investing

Principles and Practice of Impact Investing : A Catalytic Revolution