scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.

TLDR
It is argued that a theory of language must be able to account for all three methods of signaling as they manifest within and across composite utterances and can be viewed as intentionally communicative action involving the specific range of semiotic resources available in situated human interactions.
Abstract
Signers and speakers coordinate a broad range of intentionally expressive actions within the spatiotemporal context of their face-to-face interactions (Parmentier, 1994; Clark, 1996; Johnston, 1996; Kendon, 2004). Varied semiotic repertoires combine in different ways, the details of which are rooted in the interactions occurring in a specific time and place (Goodwin, 2000; Kusters, Spotti, Swanwick & Tapio, 2017). However, intense focus in linguistics on conventionalized symbolic form/meaning pairings (especially those which are arbitrary) has obscured the importance of other semiotics in face-to-face communication. A consequence is that the communicative practices resulting from diverse ways of being (e.g. deaf, hearing) are not easily united into a global theoretical framework. Here we promote a theory of language that accounts for how diverse humans coordinate their semiotic repertoires in face-to-face communication, bringing together evidence from anthropology, semiotics, gesture studies and linguistics. Our aim is to facilitate direct comparison of different communicative ecologies. We build on Clark’s (1996) theory of language use as ‘actioned’ via three methods of signaling: describing, indicating, and depicting. Each method is fundamentally different to the other, and they can be used alone or in combination with others during the joint creation of multimodal ‘composite utterances’ (Enfield, 2009). We argue that a theory of language must be able to account for all three methods of signaling as they manifest within and across composite utterances. From this perspective, language—and not only language use—can be viewed as intentionally communicative action involving the specific range of semiotic resources available in situated human interactions.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

打磨Using Language,倡导新理念

付伶俐
TL;DR: Using Language部分的�’学模式既不落俗套,又能真正体现新课程标准所倡导的�'学理念,正是年努力探索的问题.

Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition

TL;DR: In “Constructing a Language,” Tomasello presents a contrasting theory of how the child acquires language: It is not a universal grammar that allows for language development, but two sets of cognitive skills resulting from biological/phylogenetic adaptations are fundamental to the ontogenetic origins of language.

KARL BUHLER: THEORY OF LANGUAGE: The representational function of language

Karl Bühler
TL;DR: With this translation, Buhler's ideas on many problems that are still controversial and others only recently rediscovered, are now accessible to the English-speaking world.

Rethinking Context Language As An Interactive Phenomenon

Ralf Dresner
TL;DR: Thank you very much for reading rethinking context language as an interactive phenomenon, where people have look hundreds of times for their chosen novels, but end up in malicious downloads.
References
More filters
Book

Language and Symbolic Power

TL;DR: In this article, the economy of language exchange and its relation to political power is discussed. But the authors focus on the production and reproduction of Legitimate language and do not address its application in the theory of political power.
MonographDOI

Using language: Index of names

Book

Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance

TL;DR: In this article, Gesture units, gesture phrases and speech are classified into three categories: visible action as gesture, visible action with speech and visible action without speech, and gesture without speech with speech.