scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Life Expectancy and Inequality: Some Conceptual Issues

Amartya Sen, +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
About
This article is published in Development and Change.The article was published on 1993-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 8 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Life expectancy & Inequality.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Income Component of the Human Development Index

TL;DR: The Human Development Reports of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) as discussed by the authors have been used to take on the task of incorporating the view of human beings as ends in the accounting and assessment of development.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen

TL;DR: The major economic contributions of Amartya Sen fall into three main areas: a philosophical critique of traditional economic assumptions, an attempt to build a more realistic economic science based on the notion of entitlements and human capabilities, and a long series of practical contributions to welfare economics.
Journal Article

SOCIAL RETURNS FROM DRINKING WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE EDUCATION A Case Study of Two Coastal Villages in Kerala

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used Sen's commodities and capabilities approach to estimate the social returns from investing in water supply, sanitation and hygiene education (WATSANGENE) from the UNICEF model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Re-Defining Sustainable Human Development to Integrate Sustainability and Human Development Goals

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a set of indicators and the conditions for sustainable human development (SHD), and the numerical values of the SHD conditions indicate if higher human development is achieved with sustainable means.
Book ChapterDOI

The Human Development Index and Its Evolution

TL;DR: In this article, past criticisms of the Human Development Index (HDI) and the responses of the human development report office (HDRO) over 25 years are analyzed, and a review of these criticisms and responses chronologically clarifies how the former influenced the latter, demonstrating the process of making explicit the value judgement behind the index.