scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Manifest Dream/Association Comparison: A Criterion to Monitor the Psychotherapeutic Field

Giancarlo Trombini, +2 more
- Vol. 41, Iss: 1, pp 61-78
TLDR
In this paper, the authors focus on the transformations of the psychotherapeutic field through the relationship dynamics which occur within it, and present a phenomenology of the development of the qualities of the relationships of the client, as they become visible in his dream narrations and the subsequent associations in the analysis room.
Abstract
Summary The present work focuses on the transformations of the psychotherapeutic field through the relationship dynamics which occur within it. The first part of this article starts with a brief outline of the Gestalt psychological understanding of the field concept, also in its application to the psychotherapeutic situation, followed by a brief review of the introduction of the field concept into the psychoanalytic theory formation. After this, the first author first presents the theoretical concept underlying a new approach he has developed for observing the relationship dynamics in psychotherapy. Mirroring a formation of both psychoanalytic and Gestalt theory of the main author, this new approach is based on the combination of psychoanalytic and Gestalt psychological concepts. According to the clinical experience and insights of the author, the phenomenological and relational approach of Gestalt theory fits well with the psychoanalytic approach; on this basis, a criterion for recording the progress of therapy can be developed. This criterion is the phenomenology of the development of the qualities of the relationships of the client, as they become visible in his dream narrations and the subsequent associations in the analysis room and continue to develop during the session and the further course of therapy. The relationship dynamics in the dream narration is thus compared with those which develop in the course of the subsequent associations. This is demonstrated and further elaborated in the second part of this article on the basis of a clinical case. The clinical example shows how the relationship dynamics develop in this sense in the individual therapy sessions and over a longer course of therapy. The associated transformations of the therapeutic field give a good indication of the progress of therapy. The main author gained such insights into the transformations of the therapeutic field and the progression of therapy, which are visible in the course of therapy, from the careful application of the criterion “MDAC of relational dynamics”. In the specific case, there was also a high degree of correspondence between the results of the application of this phenomenological criterion and the empirical evidence of the symptom questionnaire, a self-report measure requested by the patient himself during the course of the therapy.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

Renzo Canestrari e lo sviluppo della Psicologia clinica

TL;DR: Canestrari as discussed by the authors highlights the developments of the clinical dimension of psychology undertaken and carried out by Renzo Canestraris since his entry into the School of Medicine of the University of Bologna, in 1961.
References
More filters
Journal Article

A symptom questionnaire.

TL;DR: The Symptom Questionnaire is a yes/no questionnaire with brief and simple items that contains state scales of depression, anxiety, anger-hostility, and somatic symptoms that are suitable for the measurement of distress and hostility in research and as a checklist in clinical work.
Journal ArticleDOI

The analytic situation as a dynamic field

TL;DR: The analyst’s work is described as allowing oneself to be partially involved in the transference–countertransference micro‐neurosis or micro‐psychosis, and interpretation as a means of simultaneous recovery of parts of the analyst and the patientinvolved in the field.
Book

Rediscovering Psychoanalysis: Thinking and Dreaming, Learning and Forgetting

TL;DR: Rediscovering Psychoanalysis as discussed by the authors explores how, by attending to one's own idiosyncratic ways of thinking, feeling, and responding to patients, the psychoanalyst can develop a "style" of his or her own, a way of practicing that is a living process originating, to a large degree, from the personality and experience of the analyst.