scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions.

Tatum H
- 01 Apr 1986 - 
- Vol. 30, Iss: 2, pp 207-229
TLDR
The root and sinus series of the Omnii system have been used extensively and their design attempts to maximize the use of the available bone, and placement techniques allow the manipulation of bone to form sockets in otherwise deficient areas of bone.
About
This article is published in Dental Clinics of North America.The article was published on 1986-04-01 and is currently open access. It has received 1350 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Sinus lift & Sinus Floor Augmentation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a preliminary clinical trial

TL;DR: The findings of this study indicated that uneventful osseointegration may be predictable on applying OSFE whether with or without grafting in atrophic posterior maxilla.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alveolar antral artery isolation during sinus lift procedure with the double window technique.

TL;DR: A new technique allowing the AAA isolation during sinus lift procedure in cases in which the artery is clearly present inside the surgical area, detectable through CT scan exam is described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical implications of the topography and distribution of the posterior superior alveolar artery.

TL;DR: The anatomic variations in the topographic relationships were described to provide beneficial data to minimize injury to the IObr during surgical procedure of the buccal wall of the maxillary sinus.
Journal ArticleDOI

A modified technique of harvesting tibial cancellous bone and its use for sinus grafting

TL;DR: A modified technique of harvesting a tibial cancellous graft is presented and may be performed under local anaesthesia and does not require hospitalisation.
Journal Article

Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial.

TL;DR: No patient suffered from permanent disruption of alveolar inferior nerve function, however, significantly more patients had paraesthesia for up to 3 days in the augmented group, and there was no statistically significant difference in patient preference.
Related Papers (5)