scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Methodological universalism in science and its limits. imperialism versus complexity

Wenceslao J. González
- 01 Jan 2012 - 
- Vol. 100, Iss: 1, pp 155-175
TLDR
In this paper, the limits of science are considered in the context of the issues of expansionism and imperialism, and a better understanding of these issues is given. But it is not yet clear how to understand the relationship between universalism and the complexity of science.
Abstract
Universalism in science, when conceived in methodological terms, leads to the problem of the limits of science. On the one hand, there is "methodological imperialism," which in principle involves a form of universalism. On the other hand, there is the multivariate complexity – structural and dynamic, as well as epistemological and ontological – which represents a huge problem for methodological universalism, as may be seen with the obstacles for scientific prediction. Within the context of the limits of science, there is a better understanding of the issues of expansionism and imperialism.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

From the Characterization of ‘European Philosophy of Science’ to the Case of Philosophy of the Social Sciences

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors characterize what is or might be considered as "European philosophy of science" and analyse philosophy of the social sciences as a relevant case in the European contribution to philosophy of sciences.
Book ChapterDOI

Levels of Reality, Complexity, and Approaches to Scientific Method

TL;DR: The methodological advances in science are above all associated with enhancing scientific knowledge by means of reliable processes as mentioned in this paper, which requires the analysis of levels of reality, complexity and approaches to scientific method.

Methodology through a cultural lens. The Poznań Approach to Philosophy of Humanities Against Alternative Meta-Methodological Orientations

TL;DR: The heritage and prospects of the Poznan approach to philosophy of humanities are discussed in this article, with a focus on the meta-methodological questions and the culturalistic program of methodology.
Book ChapterDOI

Pragmatism and Pluralism as Methodological Alternatives to Monism, Reductionism and Universalism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a thematic view on the central tenets of pragmatism and pluralism to outline their consequences for scientific research as alternative to the influential conceptions mentioned, including the emphasis on practice, which leads to efficacy in realizing the collective goals of research, and the recognition of the diversity in scientific research, which is in tune with the polyhedral character of reality (natural, social and artificial) and its ontological levels.
Book ChapterDOI

Evaluation and Limits of Prediction in Economics

TL;DR: In this paper, the evaluation of predictions in the context of economic models is considered taking into account the problem of uncertainty and, consequently, forecast uncertainty, and the existence of predictive errors and their economic costs.