scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
To agree on an “unambiguous language” concerning the terminology and classification that can be used by all relevant medical and paramedical disciplines in the Netherlands, the so-called CANS model is described and helps professionals to classify patients unambiguously.
Abstract
Background: There is no universally accepted way of labelling or defining upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A variety of names are used and many different classification systems have been introduced. Objective: To agree on an “unambiguous language” concerning the terminology and classification that can be used by all relevant medical and paramedical disciplines in the Netherlands. Methods: A Delphi consensus strategy was initiated. The outcomes of a multidisciplinary conference were used as a starting point. In total, 47 experts in the field of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders were delegated by 11 medical and paramedical professional associations to form the expert panel for the Delphi consensus strategy. Each Delphi round consisted of a questionnaire, an analysis and a feedback report. Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved. The experts reported the consensus in a model. This so-called CANS model describes the term, definition and classification of complaints of arm, neck and/or shoulder (CANS) and helps professionals to classify patients unambiguously. CANS is defined as “musculoskeletal complaints of arm, neck and/or shoulder not caused by acute trauma or by any systemic disease”. The experts classified 23 disorders as specific CANS, because they were judged as diagnosable disorders. All other complaints were called non-specific CANS. In addition, the experts defined “alert symptoms” on the top of the model. Conclusions: The use of the CANS model can increase accurate and meaningful communication among healthcare workers, and may also have a positive influence on the quality of scientific research, by enabling comparison of data of different studies.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the shoulder - A systematic review of the literature

TL;DR: High repetitive work, forceful exertion in work, awkward postures, and high psychosocial job demand are associated with the occurrence of SIS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders at the elbow: a systematic literature review

TL;DR: Several physical and psychosocial factors at work may result in an increased occurrence of specific disorders at the elbow.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Part I: Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Treatments–A Systematic Review

TL;DR: The reviewed evidence supports that a number of nonsurgical interventions benefit CTS in the short term, but there is sparse evidence on the midterm and long-term effectiveness of these interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: A systematic review

TL;DR: There is support for the notion that cognitive reassurance is more beneficial than affective reassurance, and a tentative model based on these findings is presented, which proposes priorities for future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Frozen shoulder: the effectiveness of conservative and surgical interventions--systematic review.

TL;DR: Strong evidence for the effectiveness of steroid injections and laser therapy in short-term and moderate evidence for steroid injections in mid-term follow-up is found and high quality RCTs studying long-term results are clearly needed in this field.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.

TL;DR: The aim of this study was to obtain consensus among experts about a set of generic core items for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the final criteria list (the Delphi list) was satisfactory to all participants.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Delphi technique: myths and realities.

TL;DR: Although the Delphi technique should be used with caution, it appears to be an established method of harnessing the opinions of an often diverse group of experts on practice-related problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.

TL;DR: The recommendations are divided in five categories: literature search, inclusion criteria, methodologic quality assessment, data extraction, and data analysis, and additional recommendations are included regarding assessment of clinical relevance, and reporting of results and conclusions.
Journal Article

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

TL;DR: This assessment aims to identify the factors that affect the decisions that emerge from consensus development methods and to assess the implications of the findings for the development of clinical guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery

TL;DR: The DASH can detect and differentiate small and large changes of disability over time after surgery in patients with upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders and show treatment effectiveness after surgery for subacromial impingement and carpal tunnel syndrome.
Related Papers (5)