scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer

Kenneth E. Stanley
- 01 Jul 1980 - 
- Vol. 65, Iss: 1, pp 25-32
TLDR
The three most important prognostic factors affecting survival were the Karnofsky initial performance status score, extent of disease, and weight loss in the previous 6 months.
Abstract
Seventy-seven prognostic factors were considered in an evaluation of more than 5,000 patients with inoperable bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung; these patients were entered on the Veterans Administration Lung Group protocols 9-15 (1968-78). Fifty prognostic factors for survival were identified, and their relative contributions to patient survival were considered. The three most important prognostic factors affecting survival were the Karnofsky initial performance status score, extent of disease, and weight loss in the previous 6 months. These factors denoted three general prognostic components: current physical status, current disease status, and prior physical status. Initial performance status was the dominant prognostic factor. Characterization of patient's function status with the use of the Karnofsky scale was preferred to a summarized scale or a dichotomization into ambulatory versus nonambulatory. The current practice of dichotomizing factors resulted in the loss of much prognostic information. Other factors, such as tumor size, histologic type, and institution, appeared to be important when considered alone. However, their contribution was relatively minor after a correction was made for the effects of initial performance status, extent of disease, and prior weight loss. Depending on these three prognostic factors alone, median survival varied between 6 weeks and over a year. Reporting of results without the consideration of such prognostic factors severly hampers any comparisons that may be made between investigations.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.

TL;DR: Oncologists may train themselves to use the Karnofsky Performance Status in a standard way, which should increase reliability and validity of the KPS and has implications for patients and research studies that use KPS as a stratifying variable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Concomitant Cisplatin and Radiotherapy on Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

TL;DR: Cisplatin, given daily in combination with the radiotherapy described here to patients with nonmetastatic but inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer, improved rates of survival and control of local disease at the price of substantial side effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nutritional assessment: A comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements

TL;DR: 24. Manganese content of large volume parenteral solutions and of nutrient additives in long term home TPN patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Non-surgical oncology

TL;DR: The guidelines for the use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and tube feeding (TF) in cancer patients were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Survival determinants in extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: the Southwest Oncology Group experience.

TL;DR: The results suggest the need to modify the stage IV category in NSCLC and suggest that although several factors were independent variables in the Cox models, three important prognostic subgroups were easily defined through RPA.
Related Papers (5)