Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer.
read more
Citations
Assessing the Impact
Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients
Work ability and return-to-work in cancer patients
Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review
References
Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook
Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art
Assessing the Impact
Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review
Related Papers (5)
Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer" ?
Interestingly, it was emphasized by several participants that employers may be unaware of the services and support that could help, which indicates the need for further research and recommendations to be given to employers ( Morell & Pryce 2005 ). Further qualitative research comparing these factors, supported by quantitative data would strengthen the data interpretability. Further research also needs to survey organizations to identify their policies towards and support of returning cancer patients. It is hoped that these findings will help highlight the dynamics of work return for cancer survivors and inform future service improvements, in terms of both occupational health advice during treatment and enhancing employers ’ awareness of their responsibility in supporting employees ’ returning to work following cancer.
Q3. What was the main reason for the cancer survivors to return to work?
Participants’ desire to return to normality and distract themselves from the cancer was another major reason to return; after the focus of their life had been on fighting the disease, many wanted to move on and regain control of their lives (Peteet 2000).
Q4. How many participants emphasized that they used work as a distraction from their illness?
Normality Around one-third of participants (10) emphasized that they used work as a distraction from their illness or treatment to regain a sense of normality.
Q5. How many people returned to work after a cancer diagnosis?
among those who did return to work (27), 10 returned to the same job and schedule, nine decreased or changed their hours, two reduced their hours and changed their job role, three changed employer and three became self-employed.
Q6. What were the main side effects of the cancer treatment?
Effects of the cancer and treatment Numerous physical side effects were referred to, and some were dependent on the type of cancer or treatment, including lymphoedema and arm swelling, bowel and urinary problems, speech difficulties, nausea, depression, soreness and reduced concentration.
Q7. How long did the participants stay on sick leave?
Of the 29 participants, most stated that they temporarily stopped working (24), seven of these had a short time off for postoperative recovery (3–9 weeks) and worked during further treatments, 17 continued on sick leave during treatments (3–18 months).
Q8. What did the woman say about going back to work?
This 44-year-old woman explained:Going back to work for me is about just being slightly more normal, because going through cancer isn’t normal, and going back to work . . . going in, enjoying my job, making a difference.
Q9. What did the participants say about the increased susceptibility to infections?
Several participants mentioned increased susceptibility to infections; this often meant they needed more time off for minor illnesses.