Secularism before the Strasbourg Court: Abstract Constitutional Principles as a Basis for Limiting Rights
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the Strasbourg Court was required to assess whether the European Convention on Human Rights can accommodate a secularism whose aims and justifications go beyond the protection of the rights of others and include abstract goals such as upholding the religious neutrality of the state.Abstract:
The justification for the restrictions on religion inherent in secularism is the subject of lively debate in constitutional and political theory. In Ebrahimian v France the Strasbourg Court was required to assess whether the European Convention on Human Rights can accommodate a secularism whose aims and justifications go beyond the protection of the rights of others and include abstract goals such as upholding the religious neutrality of the state. The resulting judgment highlights both the inability of rights to provide an adequate account of the relationship between religion and the state and how the text of the Convention struggles to give adequate weight to constitutional principles whose justification arises from sources other than the protection of fundamental rights. I suggest that the Court was correct to reaffirm its stance that secularism and strict neutrality can be in harmony with the values of the Convention. However, it needs to be more clear about the reasons for this stance and to be vigilant in its protection of private autonomy so that the use of abstract principles to restrict religious expression does not give excessive latitude to states to restrict individual autonomy and minority rightsread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Secularism and state neutrality: the headscarf in French and German public schools
Nicky Jones,Kerstin Braun +1 more
TL;DR: In recent years, both Germany and France have been confronted with the question of whether religious clothing could be worn in public schools as mentioned in this paper, and the wearing of the Islamic headscarf arouse...
Reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities: Part of the right to equality and non-discrimination
TL;DR: Waddington, L. (2018).
Book ChapterDOI
Islamophobia as a Key Contextual Factor in Human Rights Adjudication
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the existing mechanisms in European human rights law that relate to protection from Islamophobia, and evaluate their potential role in the EU Counter-Narrative Toolkit.
Related Papers (5)
Principles of National Constitutionalism limiting Individual Claims in Human Rights Law
Paul De Hert,Stefan Somers +1 more