scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

State Mandated Testing and Educational Reform: Context and Consequences

Peter W. Airasian
- 01 May 1987 - 
- Vol. 95, Iss: 3, pp 393-412
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In response to 20 years of educational growth, shifts in the locus of school control, and politicization of educational decision making, new forms and uses of standardized testing have arisen.
Abstract
In response to 20 years of educational growth, shifts in the locus of school control, and politicization of educational decision making, new forms and uses of standardized testing have arisen. In particular, policy-oriented tests that are mandated and controlled by agencies external to the local school have become widely used to certify student and teacher competence. It is the use of such certification tests that is at the root of most current debate and controversy regarding educational testing. This article describes the social trends that have spawned the new testing programs. It considers the characteristics and the educational consequences of the new state-mandated tests. A set of propositions to guide understanding of testing debate and controversy is provided.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Professional Development and Teacher Change

TL;DR: Guskey and Huberman as mentioned in this paper described a model of teacher change originally presented nearly two decades ago that began my long and warm friendship with Michael Huberman and led to the development of our co-edited book, Professional Development in Education: new paradigms and practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis

TL;DR: The authors analyzed 49 qualitative studies to examine how high-stakes testing affects curriculum, defined here as embodying content, knowledge form, and pedagogy, finding that curricular content is narrowed to tested subjects, subject area knowledge is fragmented into test-related pieces, and teachers increase the use of teacher-centered pedagogies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inequality, A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America.

Arthur H. Moehlman
- 01 Jul 1974 - 
TL;DR: The book Inequality by Christopher Jencks is in one sense an arid waste of somewhat confusing and misleading statistics between chapter one and chapter nine, and, in another sense, a destructive, unscientific critique of American education and families.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stability and Change in Human Characteristics.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used available results from numerous longitudinal studies in a variety of disciplines to test the Overlap Hypothesis on these studies and found that it provides a method for comparing actual correlations with those expected on the basis of the hereditary environment.
References
More filters
Book

Statistical abstract of the United States

TL;DR: The Red River of the North basin of the Philippines was considered a part of the Louisiana Purchase by the United States Department of Commerce in the 1939 Census Atlas of the United Philippines as discussed by the authors.
Book

Equality of Educational Opportunity

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the importance of equity and excellence in education in the context of the 1968 Equalization of EdUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (EOW) campaign.
Book

The Structuring of Organizations

TL;DR: This [reading] argues that spans of control, types of formalization and decentralization, planning systems, and matrix structures should not be picked and chosen independently, the way a shopper picks vegetables at the market or a diner a meal at a buffet table.
Book

A place called school

TL;DR: This is the revolutionary account of the largest on-scene study of U.S. schools ever conducted, which provides compelling evidence that what the authors have will not do, and that only a thorough revolution can bring the reality of the school closer to its ideal.
Book

Inequality : a reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America

TL;DR: Most Americans say they believe in equality. But when pressed to explain what they mean by this, their definitions are usually full of contradictions as mentioned in this paper. But most Americans also believe that some people are more competent than others, and that this will always be so, no matter how much we reform society.