scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The Structuring of Organizations

TLDR
This [reading] argues that spans of control, types of formalization and decentralization, planning systems, and matrix structures should not be picked and chosen independently, the way a shopper picks vegetables at the market or a diner a meal at a buffet table.
Abstract
This [reading] argues that […] spans of control, types of formalization and decentralization, planning systems, and matrix structures should not be picked and chosen independently, the way a shopper picks vegetables at the market or a diner a meal at a buffet table. Rather, these and other parameters of organizational design should logically configure into internally consistent groupings. Like most phenomena — atoms, ants, and stars — characteristics of organizations appear to fall into natural clusters, or configurations.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a model that incorporates this overall argument in the form of a series of hypothesized relationships between different dimensions of social capital and the main mechanisms and proces.
Book

Leadership in Organizations

Gary A. Yukl
TL;DR: This book presents a meta-leadership framework for a post-modern view of leadership that considers the role of language, identity, and self-consistency in the development of leaders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational innovation and 13 potential determinants resulted in statistically significant associations for specialization, functional differencing, and functional differences as mentioned in this paper. But, the authors did not consider the role of organizational innovation in organizational innovation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derived a crude typology of firms: Simple firms are small and their power is centralized at the top, while planning firms are big, their goal being smooth and efficient operation through the use of formal controls and plans.
References
More filters