scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The dividing discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory

P. A. Reynolds
- 01 Jul 1986 - 
- Vol. 62, Iss: 3, pp 497-498
About
This article is published in International Affairs.The article was published on 1986-07-01. It has received 27 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Hegemony & Diversity (politics).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?

TL;DR: In this article, the state of the discipline of international relations is reviewed from statements made by the editors in their editorial published in the first issue of this journal, starting from statements of the editors themselves.

On the History and Historiography of International Relations

TL;DR: In the last decade, a wealth of new literature has appeared that greatly challenges much of the conventional wisdom regarding the development of International Relations (IR) as discussed by the authors, and it is even possible to suggest that progress is being made in understanding the complex and multifaceted story of the emergence and maturation of IR as an academic field of study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Revisiting the “American Social Science”—Mapping the Geography of International Relations

TL;DR: The authors analyzed bibliometric data and found that US-based scholars continue to dominate IR journals, but also that IR is one of the least US-dominated social sciences and that it has become markedly less so since the 1960s.
Journal ArticleDOI

“Contrapuntal Reading” as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors point out that contrapuntal reading offers students of IR a method of studying world politics that focuses on our "intertwined and overlapping histories, past and present" and a metaphor for thinking about Global IR as regional and global, one and many.

Changing Alliance and Cooperation Dynamics: Globalization, Nation-State and the Threat

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the differences between cooperation and alliance in relation to terrorism and international relations, and present a method to identify the most explanatory power of the new threat in comparison to other independent variables.