scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The logic of paradox

Graham Priest
- 01 Jan 1979 - 
- Vol. 8, Iss: 1, pp 219-241
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A new way of handling the logical paradoxes is suggested, where instead of trying to dissolve them, or explain what has gone wrong, the authors should accept them and learn to come to live with them.
Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to suggest a new way of handling the logical paradoxes. Instead of trying to dissolve them, or explain what has gone wrong, we should accept them and learn to come to live with them. This is argued in Sections I and II. For obvious reasons this will require the abandonment, or at least modification, of 'classical' logic. A way to do this is suggested in Section III. Sections IV and V discuss some implications of this approach to paradoxes.

read more

Citations
More filters

Correspondence analysis for strong three-valued logic

TL;DR: A new proof system for Lukasiewicz’s three-valued logic is obtained by characterizing each possible single entry in the truth-table of a unary or a binary truth-functional operator that could be added to K3 by a basic inference scheme.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accepting inconsistencies from the paradoxes

TL;DR: It is proved that a first-order language for number theory can be semantically closed by having its own global truth predicate under some non-standard interpretation and thus that it actually can contain the Liar sentence.

New Grounds for Naive Truth Theory

Stephen Yablo
TL;DR: A theory is semantically closed if it contains, for each sentence A of the language in which it is framed, all biconditionals of the form T[A] ≡ A.
Book ChapterDOI

Two Genuine 3-Valued Paraconsistent Logics

TL;DR: This paper presents two genuine three-valued paraconsistent logics, i.e. logics obeying neither \(p, \l not p \vdash q\) nor \(\vdash \lnot (p \wedge p)\), and studies their basic properties and their relations with other paracons persistent logics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring coherence using LP-models

TL;DR: A technique for measuring the degree of (in)coherence of inconsistent sets of propositional formulas is introduced, and Hunter's objections to many-valued paraconsistent logics as instruments for measuring (in]coherence are addressed.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics

TL;DR: In this article, the notion of material adequacy of a definition of truth is defined as follows: if all these equivalences follow from it, then the definition is true if, and only if, p.X is true.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Semantic Conception of Truth: and the Foundations of Semantics

TL;DR: In this article, the notion of material adequacy of a definition of truth is defined as follows: if all these equivalences follow from it, then the definition is true if, and only if, p.X is true.
Book

Grundlagen der Mathematik

TL;DR: In this article, a vorliegende Buch soll einer eingehenden Orientierung uber den gegenwartigen Stoff der HILBERTschen Beweistheorie dienen.