Transforming gender relations through water, sanitation, and hygiene programming and monitoring in Vietnam
read more
Citations
A Systematic Review of Water and Gender Interlinkages: Assessing the Intersection With Health
Understanding empowerment in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH): a scoping review
WASH and Gender: a critical review of the literature and implications for gender-transformative WASH research
“Tourism, water, and gender”—An international review of an unexplored nexus
Water, Sanitation, and Women's Empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis
References
Mobilization without Emancipation? Women's Interests, the State, and Revolution in Nicaragua
Gender planning in the Third World: meeting practical and strategic gender needs.
Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training
The Conditions and Consequences of Choice: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment
The 2030 Agenda: challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women's rights
Related Papers (5)
Mainstreaming gender in the WASH sector: dilution or distillation?
Gender in community water supply, sanitation and water resource protection: A guide to methods and techniques
Frequently Asked Questions (20)
Q2. What was the common outcome of the study?
The most commonly reported outcome experienced at the household level, was improved communication between male and female household members, in which women increased their influence over decision-making.
Q3. How many votes were cast for each of the six strategic gender outcomes?
On average, 68 per cent of all votes cast by both women (72) and men (67) were cast for ‘a lot of change’ in relation to each of the six strategic gender outcomes identified at household and community level.
Q4. How many participants participated in the research?
In total, the research engaged 187 men and women: 48 participants in semi-structured interviews, and 139 participants in pocket-voting.
Q5. What are the main reasons for the need for improving WASH conditions in households?
Improving WASH conditions in households usually supports women in these unpaid domestic caregiving roles, linking to SDG5’s focus on caregiving and unpaid domestic work as a driver and a result of gender inequality (Razavi 2016).
Q6. What can be done to help improve the gender of the WASH program?
genderresponsive monitoring tools can be used as an important capacity building approach for program staff and partners.
Q7. What were the factors found in the Timor-Leste study?
Other factors found in the Timor-Leste study (Kilsby 2012) which were less commonly reported in their research included: women in new roles acting as role models for others; funds and technical support from NGOs; and women staff working in communities.
Q8. How many of the participants described a change in power relations?
Thirty-nine of the 48 participants interviewed (that is, 81 per cent) described at least one change over the previous three years that indicated a positive shift in power relations between men and women.
Q9. What did the older Vân Kiu woman report about her increased self-confidence?
One younger Vân Kiều women reported her increased self-confidence as a result of a change in household composition;Four years ago, since The authormoved to live independently, The authorwas more forcible and less shy because the authors had common children and my husband must help to take care of the children.
Q10. What are the main reasons why women and girls are at risk of violence?
Women and girls are often at risk of violence when collecting water, bathing, or living in locations without adequate sanitation designed with safety in mind.
Q11. What are the benefits of facilities closer to home?
Considerations such as facilities closer to home meet practical needs and can be very effective in reducing vulnerability to VAWG (House et. al., 2014).
Q12. What were the locations selected for inclusion in the research?
The research locationsSeven communities across three Central Provinces in Vietnam; Quảng Trị, Quảng Bình and Kon Tum were selected for inclusion in the research.
Q13. What is the main idea of Naila Kabeer’s model of empowerment?
Although she does not explicitly focus on WASH [2], Naila Kabeer’s model of empowerment conceptualises the provision of material resources to women as the starting point for a process whereby they are able to put their choices and aims into action, ultimately achieving empowerment.
Q14. What is the evidence base on the impact of WASH on women and girls?
WASH provisioning has potential to have a strategic impact on women and girls by freeing them to spend time in activities that bring material benefits, notably income generation or education, however the global evidence base on these impacts is relatively weak and requires further research to prove with rigour.
Q15. What is the role of the GWMT in the WASH programme?
Making the distinction between practical and strategic gender needs in the design, implementation and monitoring of WASH programmes, including through the use of the GWMT, provides a significant opportunity to ensure that WASH programmes are going beyond an approach that includes women on grounds of efficiency, or claim aims of gender equality without a real understanding of how to achieve this.
Q16. Why did the Vân Kiu ethnic people have never washed clothes?
Their Vân Kiều ethnic people are used to distributing all housework to their wives, men have never washed clothes because they are shy, and they are afraid that someone else would see them wash clothes.
Q17. Why is the case to address gender issues in WASH often made on grounds of enhanced efficiency?
The case to address gender issues in WASH is often made on grounds of enhanced efficiency instead of on the grounds of empowerment or gender equality as policy rationales.
Q18. What was the reason for the increase in men’s drinking?
One explanation for this was an increase in standards of living, which resulted in men drinking and not wanting to help with other activities.
Q19. What is the role of the GWMT in bringing about gender equality?
this depends on the explicit use of contextually appropriate strategies to bring about genuine changes in power dynamics and increased gender equality through programming and monitoring.
Q20. What is the main argument for a comprehensive means of documenting and assessing strategic gender outcomes?
It has been argued that within WASH programming, in particular, a comprehensive means of documenting and assessing strategic gender outcomes, as distinct from practical gender needs, has been lacking (Carrard et. al. 2013).