scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of flow–volume curves to predict oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective validation study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
These results suggest that the previously derived prediction model was not sufficient to reliably predict the response to treatment of OSA with MAS, and a combination of a functional assessment using flow–volume curves and a structural evaluation of the upper airway with imaging modalities may result in a prediction model with better performance characteristics.
Abstract
Flow–volume curves have been shown to relate to upper airway physiology during sleep and may be useful for predicting the response to treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with mandibular advancement splints (MAS). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the potential clinical utility of a previously derived prediction method using flow–volume curves performed during wakefulness. Patients with newly diagnosed OSA interested in undertaking treatment with a custom-made MAS were approached to participate in the study. Response to treatment was defined by a 50% or greater reduction in the apnea–hypopnea index. Flow–volume curves were performed in the erect position prior to construction of the MAS. Flow–volume curves were performed in 35 patients. Of these, 25 patients were responders, and 10 patients were non-responders. A combined cut-off of an inspiratory flow rate at 50% of vital capacity (MIF50) less than 6.0 L/s and a ratio of the expiratory flow rate at 50% of vital capacity to MIF50 of greater than 0.7 correctly classified 48.6% of the patients. It had a sensitivity of 36.0%, specificity of 80.0%, positive predictive value of 81.8%, and negative predictive value of 33.3%. These results suggest that the previously derived prediction model, using flow–volume curves performed during wakefulness, was not sufficient to reliably predict the response to treatment of OSA with MAS. A combination of a functional assessment using flow–volume curves and a structural evaluation of the upper airway with imaging modalities may result in a prediction model with better performance characteristics.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea: mandibular advancement device therapy

TL;DR: MADs are recommended for patients with mild to moderate OSA and for those who do not tolerate CPAP, and the treatment must be followed up and the device adjusted or exchanged in relation to the outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Oral Appliance Treatment Response and Polysomnographic Phenotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

TL;DR: In a large sample, a large cohort of MAS treated patients confirm that demographic, anthropometric, and polysomnographic data only weakly inform about MAS efficacy, supporting the need for alternative objective prediction methods to reliably select patients for MAS treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sleep endoscopy with simulation bite for prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome

TL;DR: The results of this study suggest that the use of a simulation bite in maximal comfortable protrusion of the mandible, as used during DISE in patients with OSA, tends to be effective in predicting treatment response of MAD treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction of oral appliance treatment outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

TL;DR: The predictive accuracy varied depending on the definitions of treatment success used as well as the type of index test, and the studies with the best predictive accuracy and lowest risk of bias and concerns of applicability used a multisensor catheter.
Journal ArticleDOI

CPAP Pressure for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Response in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

TL;DR: In Australian patients, the majority of whom are Caucasian, a higher therapeutic CPAP pressure requirement in conjunction with age and OSA severity characteristics may be useful to indicate likelihood of success with MAS as an alternative therapy.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects.

TL;DR: Techniques of recording, scoring, and doubtful records are carefully considered, and Recommendations for abbreviations, types of pictorial representation, order of polygraphic tracings are suggested.
Related Papers (5)