scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

What a Difference a State Makes: California’s Authority to Regulate Motor Vehicle Emissions Under the Clean Air Act and the Future of State Autonomy

Chiara Pappalardo
- Vol. 10, Iss: 1, pp 169-224
TLDR
The revocation of California's authority frustrates ambitious initiatives undertaken in California and in other states to reduce local air pollution and mitigate the effects of climate change from mobile sources as discussed by the authors, and instead of suppressing California's experimentation with zero emissions vehicles, this and future Administrations should embrace new ways to cooperate with California and a growing number of states that have begun thinking creatively about reforming the transportation sector.
Abstract
Air pollutants from motor vehicles constitute one of the leading sources of local and global air degradation with serious consequences for human health and the overall stability of Earth’s climate. Under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), for over fifty years, the state of California has served as a national “laboratory” for the testing of technological solutions and regulatory approaches to improve air quality. On September 19, 2019, the Trump Administration revoked California’s authority to set more stringent pollution emission standards. The revocation of California’s authority frustrates ambitious initiatives undertaken in California and in other states to reduce local air pollution and mitigate the effects of climate change from mobile sources. This Article argues that the reasons offered by the Administration to justify its rollback of California’s authority are not persuasive. They do not find support in the history and longstanding interpretation of the CAA, in the Environmental Protection Agency’s implementation practice, or in the regulated industry, and, coupled with halting the rise in federal fuel economy standards, constitute unsound policy at a crucial moment for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation. In addition, this Article advances the idea that instead of aiming to suppress California’s experimentation with zero emissions vehicles, this and future Administrations should embrace new ways to cooperate with California and a growing number of states that have begun thinking creatively about reforming the transportation sector. By building on a flexible and multilevel model of governance, grounded on forms of cooperative federalism that leverage state innovation and regulatory expertise, the federal government together with the states will ensure a more competitive future for America.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

The Likelihood of a Carbon Tax in China: Wishful Thinking or a Real Possibility?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the imposition of a carbon tax in China and explore three options for regulating GHG emissions in quantities considered necessary to be an effective mitigation strategy: traditional command-and-control (CAC) regulation, tradable permit markets, and taxes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Unintended consequences from nested state and federal regulations: The case of the Pavley greenhouse-gas-per-mile limits $

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reveal significant unintended consequences from recent 14-state efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through limits on greenhouse gases per mile from new cars, and show that while such efforts significantly reduce emissions from new vehicles sold in the adopting states, they cause substantial emissions increases from new car sold in other (non-adopting) states and from used cars.
Posted Content

Think Globally, Act Globally: The Limits of Local Climate Policies

TL;DR: State-level actions to address global climate change, such as laws and litigation recently undertaken by California and by several Northeastern states to limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, reflect creative legal strategies understandably intended to achieve a major environmental objective while the US federal government has not joined the Kyoto Protocol and has not yet adopted national legislation as discussed by the authors.
Book ChapterDOI

Stepping down but not out – Characteristics of post-executive careers in Switzerland

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present characteristics and trends in the market for executives' post-career activities and employ Switzerland as a case in point, based on a dataset comprising the 104 executives who retired from top management positions at 50 of the largest publicly listed Swiss companies and left the executive labour market between 2006 and 2008.

From Paris to Pittsburgh: U.S. State and Local Leadership in an Era of Trump

Vicki Arroyo
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on recent developments in subnational leadership on both climate mitigation and adaptation to demonstrate the breadth and depth of engagement by leading states and cities, and provide just some examples that illustrate how, despite the Trump Administration's best efforts to dismantle federal environmental policies, many States and cities are fighting federal rollbacks and moving forward with their own policies to address climate change, promote a clean energy economy, and prepare for the consequences of a changing climate.
Posted Content

The Likelihood of a Carbon Tax in China: Wishful Thinking or a Real Possibility?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the imposition of a carbon tax in China and explore three options for regulating GHG emissions in quantities considered necessary to be an effective mitigation strategy: traditional command-and-control (CAC) regulation, tradable permit markets, and taxes.