scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Where Have All the IPOs Gone

TLDR
In this article, the authors propose an alternative explanation for the decline in the number of initial public offerings in the United States: the advantages of selling out to a larger organization, which can speed a product to market and realize economies of scope, have increased relative to the benefits of operating as an independent firm.
Abstract
During 1980–2000, an average of 310 companies per year went public in the United States. Since 2000, the average has been only 99 initial public offerings (IPOs) per year, with the drop especially precipitous among small firms. Many have blamed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the 2003 Global Settlement’s effects on analyst coverage for the decline in IPO activity. We find very little support for the conventional wisdom, and we offer an alternative explanation. Our economies of scope hypothesis posits that the advantages of selling out to a larger organization, which can speed a product to market and realize economies of scope, have increased relative to the benefits of operating as an independent firm.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Graduation of initial public offering firms from junior stock markets: evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explore the graduation of initial public offering (IPO) firms and regulatory reforms in junior stock markets and find that firms with high research and development intensity are less likely to graduate from the TSE junior markets (MOTHERS and JASDAQ).
Journal ArticleDOI

Dissecting the listing gap: Mergers, private equity, or regulation?

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors compare the effects of merger activity, private equity investments, and stock market regulations on the number of missing public firms in the U.S. and other developed economies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Examining IPO Success In The Emerging Growth Enterprise Market Of China

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a regression model to investigate the relationships between these factors and suggest that the firm's net profit and its growth rate substantively determine the IPO volume.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations

TL;DR: The authors describes and analyzes the structure of VC organizations, focusing on the relationship between investors and venture capitalists and between venture-capital firms and the ventures in which they invest, and contrasts VC organizations with large, publicly traded corporations and with leveraged buyout organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a disaggregated approach to study the volatility of common stocks at the market, industry, and firm levels and found that over the period from 1962 to 1997 there has been a noticeable increase in firm-level volatility relative to market volatility.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?

Kent L. Womack
- 01 Mar 1996 - 
TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of new buy and sell recommendations of stocks by security analysts at major U.S. brokerage firms shows significant, systematic discrepancies between pre-recommendation prices and eventual values.
Journal ArticleDOI

Venture capitalists and the decision to go public

TL;DR: This article examined the timing of initial public offerings and private financings by venture capitalists and found that seasoned VCs are particularly proficient at taking companies public near market peaks, and that these companies go public when equity valuations are high and employ private finance when values are lower.