scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Will Africa Feed China

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Brautigam et al. as mentioned in this paper show that Chinese farming investments are in fact surprisingly limited, and land acquisitions modest, and China actually exports more food to Africa than it imports.
Abstract
Is China building a new empire in rural Africa? Over the past decade, China's meteoric rise on the continent has raised a drumbeat of alarm. China has 9 percent of the world's arable land, 6 percent of its water, and over 20 percent of its people. Africa's savannahs and river basins host the planet's largest expanses of underutilized land and water. Few topics are as controversial and emotionally charged as the belief that the Chinese government is aggressively buying up huge tracts of prime African land to grow food to ship back to China. In Will Africa Feed China?, Deborah Brautigam, one of the world's leading experts on China and Africa, probes the myths and realities behind the media headlines. Her careful research challenges the conventional wisdom; as she shows, Chinese farming investments are in fact surprisingly limited, and land acquisitions modest. Defying expectations, China actually exports more food to Africa than it imports. Is this picture likely to change? African governments are pushing hard for foreign capital, and China is building a portfolio of tools to allow its agribusiness firms to "go global." International concerns about "land grabbing" are well-justified. Yet to feed its own growing population, rural Africa must move from subsistence to commercial agriculture. What role will China play? Moving from the halls of power in Beijing to remote irrigated rice paddies of Africa, Will Africa Feed China? introduces the people and the politics that will shape the future of this engagement: the state-owned Chinese agribusiness firms that pioneered African farming in the 1960s and the entrepreneurial private investors who followed them. Their fascinating stories, and those of the African farmers and officials who are their counterparts, ground Brautigam's deeply informative, deftly balanced reporting. Forcefully argued and empirically rich, Will Africa Feed China? will be a landmark work, shedding new light on China's evolving global quest for food security and Africa's possibilities for structural transformation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism

TL;DR: In this article, the concept of operations of capital is introduced to trace connections between the expansive logic of extraction and capitalist activity in the domains of logistics and finance, arguing that extractive operations are at large across these domains, and exploring their relevance for capital's relation with its multiple outsides.
Journal ArticleDOI

Green and blue water demand from large-scale land acquisitions in Africa

TL;DR: The dynamic global vegetation model Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed Land is used to simulate green and blue water demand and crop yields for seven irrigation scenarios, and it is found that most land acquisitions are planted with crops that demand large volumes of water, and that staple crops have lower water requirements.
Journal ArticleDOI

The BRICS and Africa's search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the BRICS' approach to renewable energy cooperation and argue that, following a robust declaratory intent, implementation has taken time to achieve but there are signs of this coming on-stream.
Book

Going Beyond Aid: Development Cooperation for Structural Transformation

TL;DR: Lin et al. as mentioned in this paper examined South-South development aid and cooperation from the angle of structural transformation by studying the successful economic transformation of countries such as China and South Korea through'multiple win' solutions based on comparative advantages and economy of scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development

TL;DR: The authors reviewed Chinese infrastructure investment and showed that rather than a monolithic strategy aimed at world domination, the BRI is driven by a range of Chinese stakeholders situated at different scales whose motives vary from achieving strategic geopolitical advantage to profit-maximization.