Can genetic drift account for loss in the ability of electron uptake from solid electron donors?
Best insight from top research papers
Genetic drift can indeed play a role in the loss of the ability of electron uptake from solid electron donors. However, the impact of genetic drift on genetic diversity and population dynamics can be influenced by factors such as dispersal rates and density dependence. Studies have shown that when dispersal rates increase with population density, genetic drift can be significantly suppressed, affecting the effective population size at the expansion front. This suggests that the strength of genetic drift is intricately linked to the density-dependence in both dispersal and growth, highlighting the complex interplay between genetic processes and environmental factors in shaping microbial capabilities, such as electron uptake from solid electron donors.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
31 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
110 Citations | Genetic drift can potentially lead to loss in electron uptake ability from solid electron donors in Shewanella cells, impacting energy acquisition and environmental persistence. |
Related Questions
What is the role of the Vacancy Cu sublevel in the electron donation process in CuO?10 answersThe role of the vacancy Cu sublevel in the electron donation process in CuO is multifaceted and significantly impacts the material's electronic properties and functionality. Copper vacancies (Cu vacancies) are pivotal in enhancing the charge carrier concentration, which is crucial for improving the charge separation and transfer in CuO photocathodes, as demonstrated in photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting applications. The introduction of Cu vacancies has been shown to facilitate an increase in PEC performance, with a notable enhancement in photocurrent when the CuO photocathode is prepared in an oxygen-rich environment compared to air. This indicates that Cu vacancies play a generic role in the efficiency of Cu-based photocathodes by improving charge carrier dynamics.
Moreover, the presence of Cu vacancies is associated with the lowering of vacancy formation energy and an increase in ductility, as indicated by the highest Pugh ratio and the smallest Zener anisotropy factor among vacancy defects in Cu-based delafossites. This suggests that Cu vacancies not only contribute to the electronic properties but also to the mechanical properties of the material, enhancing its functional applications, such as in p-type conductivity.
In the context of Cu2O, a material closely related to CuO, oxygen vacancies near the Cu vacancy sites enhance the electron donating ability due to the unshared d-electrons of Cu atoms. This effect is significant enough to pin the work function energy level, thereby influencing the material's electronic structure and enhancing its field emission properties. Although this observation is specific to Cu2O, it underscores the critical role of Cu vacancies in modulating the electronic properties of copper oxides.
Density functional theory calculations further support the importance of Cu vacancies in CuO, indicating that they lead to favorable p-type conduction. This is contrasted with oxygen vacancies, which act as deep donors and are less effective in contributing to the electron donation process. The synergistic effect between oxygen vacancies and single-atom Cu in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) also highlights the role of Cu in the electron donation process, where Cu vacancies facilitate the transfer and utilization of electrons, thereby improving photocatalytic efficiency.
In summary, Cu vacancies in CuO and related materials significantly contribute to the electron donation process by enhancing charge carrier concentration, facilitating charge separation and transfer, and modulating the electronic structure to improve the material's functional applications.
Can subsequent hydrogenotrophic enrichments lead to the loss of direct electron transfer capability?5 answersSubsequent hydrogenotrophic enrichments can potentially lead to the loss of direct electron transfer (DIET) capability. In the study by Rous et al., it was observed that autotrophic bacteria enriched on a polarized cathode using H2 or the cathode as an electron source showed comparable N2 fixation rates to those enriched without a microbial electrochemical system. This suggests that the presence of alternative electron sources, such as H2, may influence the microbial community composition and potentially impact DIET capabilities. Additionally, the study by Smith et al. highlighted the complexity of interspecies interactions in DIET systems, indicating that factors beyond electrical connections, such as the expression of type VI secretion systems, can influence the effectiveness of DIET partnerships. Therefore, subsequent enrichments with hydrogenotrophic conditions may alter the microbial interactions and potentially affect the DIET capability within the community.
How does genetic drift affect microevolution?5 answersGenetic drift is a mechanism in microevolution that causes random changes in allele frequencies in a population. It occurs due to chance events and is more prominent in small populations. Genetic drift can lead to the fixation or elimination of certain alleles, resulting in an increase in homozygosity. It is an important evolutionary force, with its impact varying among species depending on the effective population size (Ne). The power of genetic drift is inversely proportional to Ne, and it can have a significant effect on genome diversity and evolution. The accumulation of genetic incompatibilities between populations is influenced by genetic drift, with larger populations and abundant genetic variation promoting increased genetic robustness and slower accumulation of incompatibilities. On the other hand, smaller populations are more susceptible to genetic drift, leading to a faster accumulation of genetic incompatibilities.
What are the factors that affect electrical conductivity in solid food?4 answersFactors that affect electrical conductivity in solid food include temperature, field strength, storage duration, sugar content, and the nature of the product and the way electricity is applied. Electrical conductivity generally increases with temperature, field strength, and storage duration until the product is overripe, while it decreases with increasing sugar content. The presence of certain components in the food, such as milk solids, whey proteins, sugars, and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, can also affect conductivity. Additionally, the electrical conductivity of solid foods can be influenced by effects that occur during conventional heating, such as starch transition, melting of fats, and changes in cell structure. Preheating can also increase the electrical conductivity of some foods, making them suitable for ohmic processing.
Relation in Solid State physics and DFT ?4 answersSolid state physics and density functional theory (DFT) have a mutual relationship and promote each other's development. DFT has been successfully used in solid state physics, materials science, high-pressure physics, mineralogy, and solid-state chemistry, enabling the calculation of various structural, chemical, optical, spectroscopic, elastic, vibrational, and thermodynamic phenomena. It has revolutionized experimental fields such as vibrational and solid-state NMR spectroscopy, allowing for the analysis and interpretation of experimental spectra. DFT is also used as an exploratory tool for materials discovery and computational experiments, including crystal structure prediction. The combination of solid-state physics and quantum mechanics, with the support of computer applications, has further enhanced the understanding and improvement of the structure and properties of solid materials.
How does genetic drift occur?5 answersGenetic drift occurs as a result of random fluctuations in allele frequencies within a population due to sampling effects. It is a stochastic process that can lead to the fixation of certain alleles while causing the loss of others, particularly those with low frequencies. This process is influenced by factors such as population size, mutation rates, and the occurrence of compensatory mutations. The effects of genetic drift include increased homozygosity in the population and the loss of genetic variation. Inbreeding, which is more common in small populations, can also contribute to genetic drift and lead to inbreeding depression. Understanding the impact of genetic drift is crucial for conservation efforts, as it can reduce the probability of population persistence.