Differential cryptanalysis using particle swarm?
Best insight from top research papers
Differential cryptanalysis using particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been explored in several papers. Shweta Pandey and Megha Mishra applied PSO to the cryptanalysis of DES, utilizing its ability to selectively explore the solution space . Salim A. Abbas Al-Ageelee and Riyam N. J. Kadhum proposed a cryptanalysis system based on PSO, with suggestions for improving its performance by incorporating simulated annealing . Sarab M. Hameed and Dalal Naeem Hmood investigated the use of PSO for cryptanalysis of transposition ciphers, demonstrating its effectiveness in recovering the key and plaintext . Shimpi Singh Jadon, Harish Sharma, Etesh Kumar, and Jagdish Chand Bansal used binary PSO for the cryptanalysis of DES, showing promising results in solving block cipher optimization problems . Waseem Shahzad, Abdul Basit Siddiqui, and Farrukh Aslam Khan presented a highly efficient PSO-based cryptanalysis approach for DES, generating optimum keys and successfully breaking the cipher .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
08 Jul 2009 14 Citations | The provided paper does not discuss differential cryptanalysis using particle swarm. The paper is about the cryptanalysis of four-rounded DES using Binary Particle Swarm Optimization. |
| The paper does not mention anything about differential cryptanalysis or its use of particle swarm. The paper is about using particle swarm optimization for the cryptanalysis of transposition cipher. | |
| The paper does not mention differential cryptanalysis using particle swarm. The paper discusses cryptanalysis using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and compares it with Genetic Algorithm (GA). | |
| The paper does not mention the use of particle swarm optimization in differential cryptanalysis. The paper is about the application of particle swarm optimization in the cryptanalysis of DES. | |
01 Jan 2012 7 Citations | The paper does not mention the use of differential cryptanalysis using particle swarm. The paper is about the application of Binary Particle Swarm Optimization in cryptanalysis of DES. |
Related Questions
What are some common techniques used in differential cryptanalysis?5 answersCommon techniques used in differential cryptanalysis include leveraging deep learning modelsfor differential distinguishers, exploring quantum computing for searching high probability differential characteristics, and utilizing machine learning to extend classical differential distinguishers. Additionally, a systematic approach based on quasidifferential trails is proposed for fixed-key analysis of differential probabilities. Researchers are increasingly applying deep learning techniques like CNN, LGBM, and LSTM for modeling classical differential cryptanalysis. These techniques aim to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of differential cryptanalysis by incorporating advanced computational methods and algorithms.
How does differential reinforcement compare to other types of reinforcement learning algorithms?5 answersDifferential reinforcement (DRA) is a behavioral treatment method that focuses on reinforcing specific behaviors while minimizing reinforcement for others, without necessarily requiring extinction. In the realm of machine learning, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms like RL-SHADE and RL-HPSDE have been developed to enhance optimization processes by combining reinforcement learning with evolutionary strategies. In the context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), DRA has shown superior outcomes compared to other reinforcement methods like differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) in reducing stereotypy and improving task engagement and completion in individuals with ASD. Additionally, reinforcement learning algorithms have been applied in robotics for tasks like robotic manipulation of Deformable Linear Objects (DLOs), showcasing their potential in practical applications.
How can machine learning be used to improve cryptanalysis?4 answersMachine learning can be used to improve cryptanalysis by applying recent advances in machine learning to the task of cryptanalysis. Cryptanalysis is the branch of cryptography that studies how cryptographic ciphers can be attacked. While cryptographic ciphers seek to keep information secret by making it appear random, discerning patterns and structure from random data is a common machine learning task. One approach, called EveGAN, treats cryptanalysis as a language translation problem and uses generative deep learning-based attacks to crack ciphers. Machine learning and deep learning have supported research work in discovering the strong and weak points of cryptographic techniques, leading to automated and AI-driven cryptanalysis. However, there are challenges encountered when using machine learning and deep learning in cryptanalysis, which researchers are addressing through new paths such as the quantum neural network approach.
What is differential privacy?5 answersDifferential privacy is a widely used notion of security that enables the processing of sensitive information. It is a privacy-preserving strategy that guarantees attackers to be unlikely to infer the dataset from which an output is derived. Differential privacy can be applied to various domains such as deep learning, social science, and data analysis. It involves adding noise to the data to protect individual privacy while maintaining statistical accuracy. Several methods and algorithms have been proposed to achieve differential privacy, including the Laplace mechanism and distribution-invariant privatization. The goal is to find a balance between privacy protection and statistical accuracy. Different approaches have been explored, including quantum extensions, deep learning frameworks, and probabilistic automata.
How can differential privacy be used to protect graph data?5 answersDifferential privacy (DP) can be used to protect graph data by ensuring both model parameter and prediction privacy. Graph Differential Privacy (GDP) is a formal DP framework tailored to graph learning settings that provides provably private model parameters and predictions. To achieve an ideal balance between accuracy and privacy in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), a progressive training scheme can be used. ProGAP, a differentially private GNN, splits the model into a sequence of overlapping submodels that are trained progressively, leading to improved accuracy-privacy trade-offs. Another approach is to use a Heterogeneous graph neural network with Semantic-aware Differential privacy Guarantees (HeteSDG), which provides double privacy guarantees for both graph features and topology. Additionally, node-level and edge-level perturbation algorithms can be used to publish graphs under node differential privacy, allowing for flexible privacy guarantees.
What are the challenges associated with differential privacy mechanism when sharing encrypted files?5 answersDifferential privacy mechanisms face challenges when sharing encrypted files. One challenge is the limitation of existing mechanisms to incorporate user-independent public knowledge, such as business locations and opening times, which leads to low practical utility. Another challenge is the need to preserve privacy and efficiency while including real-world public data to improve the realism and utility of shared trajectories. Additionally, the impact of the noise component on the generated cryptograms needs to be evaluated to assess data loss during the encryption process. These challenges highlight the importance of developing local differentially private mechanisms that can perturb hierarchically-structured, overlapping n-grams of trajectory data and utilize multi-dimensional hierarchies over publicly available external knowledge to enhance the privacy, realism, and utility of shared data.