Domestic using IA review paper
Best insight from top research papers
The review paper on internal auditing (IA) post-Enron analyzed 471 papers from 64 journals between 2005 and 2018, highlighting a lack of significant contributions to understanding the internal audit function (IAF). The literature predominantly focuses on the American context, particularly publicly listed companies, and lacks references to theory, with a reliance on positivist analyses. The review suggests that future IA research should address emerging challenges by exploring factors that enhance the effectiveness and measurability of IA practices, considering regions like emerging economies and organizational settings such as private SMEs and not-for-profit organizations. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights for researchers seeking appropriate outlets and emerging scholars defining their research directions.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| The review paper discusses the use of smart electricity controllers for home automation, enhancing efficiency, reducing energy wastage, and providing remote control of devices via internet and Bluetooth. | |
Open access 01 Jan 2009 2 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
| Automated Domestic Vacuum Cleaner Robot is a review paper focusing on developing a robot for household cleaning, enhancing convenience, and reducing manual labor through automation. |
Related Questions
Domestic using Intelligence artificial review paper5 answersA review paper on the domestic use of artificial intelligence (AI) explores its impact on various aspects. It delves into how AI is integrated into smart home technologies, enhancing living standards through intelligent interactions. Additionally, the paper discusses the development of a domestic AI computing device, highlighting its capabilities in parallel and redundant computing for high-performance and reliability. Furthermore, the review paper addresses the broader implications of AI on the job market, emphasizing the transformation it brings in terms of job creation, skill requirements, and workplace safety. Overall, the review aims to provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and policy considerations surrounding the use of AI in domestic settings, offering a comprehensive understanding of its implications for individuals, businesses, and society.
How to review a paper?5 answersThe process of reviewing a paper involves several steps. First, the reviewer should consider the purpose of the paper, its methodology, results, and conclusions. The reviewer should evaluate the contribution, execution, and conclusions of the paper. It is important to provide constructive feedback to the authors, whether it is for minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. The reviewer's recommendation should be consistent with their comments to the authors. Reviewers should also consider the visual essence of the figures and illustrations, ensuring they are professional and add value to the paper. Additionally, reviewers should recommend additional references, including their own, to support the topic of the article. The review process serves to educate junior reviewers and should be conducted with professionalism and constructive feedback. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered superior to narrative reviews due to their transparency and rigorous methodology.
How to write a review paper?5 answersTo write a review paper, it is important to add value by providing an overview and synthesizing the available information on a topic. The review should be based on current knowledge or best practices. The methodology used for selecting papers for review should be reported, and the structure of the review paper should be well-defined. It is crucial to consider the contribution, execution, and conclusions of the papers being reviewed. Reviewers should have the necessary skills, time, objectivity, and inclination to do a quality review. Ethical principles should be followed, and the review report should be critical, correct, and objective. The review process plays a critical role in the dissemination of research and provides credibility to the academic knowledge. Overall, writing a review paper requires careful evaluation, synthesis, and adherence to ethical principles.
What is literature review of this paper?5 answersA literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research in a specific field. It establishes familiarity with current research, identifies gaps in knowledge, and provides a foundation for further study. Literature review papers are influential in directing academic discourse and often map the state of the art in a subject area, while also identifying weaknesses and limitations in the existing body of knowledge. They serve as a key part of a research study, helping researchers effectively process and assess large amounts of data. Literature reviews also play a crucial role in academic writing, helping to identify relevant findings, synthesize existing data, and critically evaluate results. They are essential for developing a well-grounded thesis or dissertation, establishing credibility, and demonstrating the need for grant applications. Overall, literature reviews provide a comprehensive overview of the current research landscape and guide future research directions.
How write review paper?3 answersWriting a review paper involves several important steps. First, it is crucial to add value to the existing literature by providing a synthesis of the best resources available on a specific research question or area of research. The review should be written in a systematic fashion, clearly describing the research methods used for selecting papers and providing an unbiased point of view. Different types of review papers exist, and the structure of the paper should be well-organized. Additionally, it is important to critically evaluate the quality of the studies included in the review and differentiate between good and bad research. Finally, the review should present the findings in an attractive and readable manner, focusing on fixed ideas and offering specific critiques to improve the paper.
How to make review paper?5 answersTo make a review paper, it is important to follow a systematic process. The review process involves expert, anonymous reviews by established researchers who have already published in top journals on similar topics. Reviewers should only accept invitations to review if they have the necessary skills, time, objectivity, and inclination to do a quality review. A quality review should consider the contribution, execution, and conclusions of the paper. Additionally, the abstract of the paper should be concise and summarize the technique in a few short transitory words. The abstract should be prepared last, both in the first and updated submissions of an application. By following these steps, researchers can ensure that their review papers contribute to the body of academic knowledge and provide credibility to the research field.