scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Graphene Absorbent for PFAS remediation? 


Best insight from top research papers

Graphene-based absorbents show promise for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) remediation. Various studies highlight the effectiveness of graphene materials in adsorbing PFAS from water. For instance, graphene monoliths have been developed as passive samplers for PFAS detection in aquatic environments, demonstrating enhanced sorption capabilities through chemical modifications. Additionally, combining mineral and carbonaceous phases in adsorbents increases PFAS binding strength, showcasing the potential of mixed adsorbents for improved PFAS removal. The unique properties of graphene, such as large surface area and functional groups, contribute to its efficiency in adsorbing various pollutants, including PFAS, making it a promising candidate for pollution remediation in both water and potentially soil environments.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
Not addressed in the paper.
Graphene and functionalized graphene, especially GR-NH2, show promise as absorbents for PFAS remediation due to nanobubble contributions, as supported by simulations and experimental results.
Mixed mineral and graphene/carbon-based materials, like FeG and RemB, show enhanced sorption of PFASs, highlighting graphene's potential for PFAS remediation.
A graphene-based hydrogel monolith with tailored surface chemistry is effective for PFAS passive sampling, showing potential for PFAS remediation due to its high sorption capacity and chemical modification capabilities.
Inexpensive graphite adsorbents show reversible adsorption and desorption of PFAS via an alternating electric field, demonstrating potential for PFAS remediation.

Related Questions

Biochar for PFAS remediation?5 answersBiochar has emerged as a promising material for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) remediation. Studies have shown that biochar, especially when modified post-pyrolysis, exhibits excellent adsorption capabilities for PFAS. Biochar-alginate composite beads have demonstrated high removal efficiencies for PFOS and PFBS from aqueous solutions, outperforming some natural material-based adsorbents. Additionally, biochar amendment in PFAS-contaminated soil has been found to restore bacterial community structure and function, although it decreases microbial interaction compared to uncontaminated levels. Pyrolysis of organic waste, including sewage sludge, results in significant removal of PFAS, with emitted PFAS loads being dominated by short-chain PFAS. Overall, biochar shows promise for PFAS remediation due to its adsorption capabilities and potential for reducing PFAS contamination in various environmental matrices.
How effective are graphene-based materials in detecting and removing water pollutants?4 answersGraphene-based materials have shown remarkable effectiveness in detecting and removing water pollutants. These materials, including graphene nanoplatelets, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide membranes, exhibit high adsorption capacities due to their large surface area and unique physicochemical properties. They have been utilized in various forms, such as composites with conducting polymers, for electrochemical sensing of pollutants in water, showcasing their potential for advanced pollutant detection. The synthesis methods, adsorption characteristics, mechanisms, and kinetics of graphene-based adsorbents have been extensively studied, highlighting their efficiency in removing heavy metals, dyes, and other hazardous pollutants from aqueous environments. Overall, graphene-based materials offer a promising solution for water treatment challenges, providing a cost-effective and efficient approach to combat water pollution.
Carbon-Based Adsorbents for PFAS Remediation - Carbon Nanotubes?4 answersCarbon-based adsorbents, such as carbon nanotubes, have shown promising potential for PFAS remediation. Studies have highlighted the exceptional adsorption properties of carbon nanotubes due to their high surface area, porosity, and various adsorption sites. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes can enhance their adsorptive properties, making them selective towards specific pollutants like PFAS. Carbon nanotubes interact with PFAS through mechanisms like physical adsorption, electrostatic interactions, and chemical bonding. Additionally, novel nanocomposites like nNiFe-activated carbon have demonstrated significant PFAS reduction and fluoride generation, showing promise for PFAS transformation in both batch and flow conditions. These findings suggest that carbon-based adsorbents, including carbon nanotubes and nanocomposites, hold great potential for effective PFAS remediation strategies.
How effective are emerging technologies for removing PFAS from contaminated water sources?5 answersEmerging technologies show promise in effectively removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from contaminated water sources. Various methods have been explored, including nanofiltration with mixed-matrix-composite membranes, photo-induced degradation techniques, foam fractionation combined with electrochemical oxidation, and in situ treatment using colloidal activated carbon injected at the air-water interface within PFAS source zones. These technologies have demonstrated significant PFAS removal efficiencies, with approaches like foam fractionation and electrochemical oxidation achieving up to 50% total PFAS degradation and a decrease in toxic potency of the water. Nanofiltration with mixed-matrix-composite membranes has shown near-complete removal of model PFAS, emphasizing the potential for scalable and cost-effective treatment methods. Overall, these emerging technologies offer promising solutions for addressing PFAS contamination in water sources.
Removing pfas from water?5 answersA variety of methods have been proposed for removing PFAS from water. One approach is the use of activated carbon (AC) and aeration, which has been shown to enhance the removal of PFAS. Another method involves the use of anion exchange resins, which can effectively remove PFAS from water. Additionally, the development of PFAS-removing filters has been celebrated as a new advancement in water utility. Groundwater can also be a significant source of PFAS exposure in drinking water, and efforts are being made to develop standards for PFAS compounds. Furthermore, a water pollution treatment method involving the use of active bacteria and adsorbents has been proposed for removing impurities, including PFAS, from water.
How to clean blood of graphene ?5 answersGraphene can be cleaned from blood using various methods. One method involves using an ultrasonic processing (UP) step to etch copper and clean the bottom surface of graphene. Another method involves using a device with graphene sheets that have apertures to isolate substances from blood. Additionally, a graphene stripping device can be used to obtain large-area defect-free graphene by implementing rapid directional arrangement of graphite flakes and playing a shearing effect. Furthermore, a superhydrophobic surface made of graphene and titanium dioxide nanoparticles can be dip-coated on a film to enhance biocompatibility and inhibit biofilm formation. Lastly, a large-scale clean preparation method for graphene involves dispersing graphite raw material in a suspension, subjecting it to ultrasonic treatment, and then stripping off the graphene under a high-speed air flow.

See what other people are reading

How to synthesize hard carbon using coke or coal precursors?
5 answers
Hard carbon can be synthesized using coke or coal precursors through various methods. One approach involves utilizing coal as a precursor and introducing heteroatoms like phosphorus to enhance sodium storage performance. Another method involves preparing a hard carbon precursor from carbon-containing biomass shells through a microwave hydrothermal reaction, leading to improved efficiency of the hard carbon material. Additionally, medium-temperature coal pitch fractions can be used as precursors for synthesizing carbon materials or selective sorbents, offering new avenues for hard carbon synthesis. Furthermore, orange peel can serve as a precursor for hard carbon material, with a preparation method involving hydrothermal reaction, pre-carbonization treatment, and high-temperature pyrolysis, resulting in a uniform and high-capacity hard carbon product suitable for sodium-ion batteries.
How is the in vitro bioactivity of bioglass nanoparticles powder assed in sbf?
5 answers
The in vitro bioactivity of bioglass nanoparticles powder in Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) is assessed by examining the formation of hydroxyapatite (HAp) on the glass surface. This assessment involves characterizing the samples using techniques like X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) before and after immersion in SBF. The presence of a layer of hydroxycarbonated apatite (HAC) on the glass surface indicates good bioactivity. Additionally, changes in the surface morphology and the release of ions in the body fluid provide valuable information about the bioactivity of the bioglass nanoparticles powder. These comprehensive analyses help in evaluating the bioactive properties of the bioglass nanoparticles powder for potential applications in tissue engineering and bone repair.
The relation between pore size and adsorption in diatom?
5 answers
The pore size in diatomaceous earth plays a crucial role in adsorption capabilities. Research has shown that diatomaceous earth can have pores ranging from 0.1 nm to 10 μm, with specific pore sizes of 1-10 nm and 100 nm or more significantly impacting adsorption. Furthermore, the adsorption potential of diatom silica shells for arsenic removal is enhanced by modifying the surface with thiol and amino groups, leading to increased pore size and improved adsorption capacity. Additionally, the adsorption capacity of porous silica for CO2 decreases with larger pore sizes due to reduced silanol content, highlighting the importance of pore size in adsorption efficiency. Therefore, the relationship between pore size and adsorption in diatoms is evident, with varying pore sizes influencing the adsorption capabilities of these porous materials.
How can one create a realistic aging model for NMC622 Li-ion batteries?
5 answers
To create a realistic aging model for NMC622 Li-ion batteries, a two-step up-scaling methodology can be employed. This methodology involves deriving an analytical expression that considers impedance contributions from various processes like interfacial kinetics, double-layer adsorption, solid-phase diffusion, and lithium diffusion through the SEI layer. Additionally, incorporating aging mechanisms such as solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer growth, active material isolation (AMI), and SEI cracking into an electro-thermal P2D battery model can enhance the accuracy of aging predictions. Furthermore, integrating cycling and calendar aging models based on factors like time, temperature, state-of-charge, energy throughput, and C-rate can provide a comprehensive empirical cell-level aging model for NMC622 Li-ion batteries. This approach allows for a detailed understanding of aging phenomena and facilitates the development of effective strategies to mitigate performance degradation in NMC622 batteries.
How to make cellulose fire proof?
5 answers
To make cellulose fireproof, various methods can be employed based on the research findings. One approach involves treating cellulosic materials with an aqueous mixture of alkali metal or ammonium hydroxide and alkaline earth or aluminum metal salt, which renders the material self-extinguishing and enhances its fire resistance. Another method includes forming fire-resistant cellulose boards using waste newspapers, soy protein, boric acid, and borax, resulting in low-density boards with adequate flexural strength suitable for construction purposes. Additionally, a technique involves fabricating fire-resistant cellulose foam by processing cellulose fibers into a wetted mixture with a fire-retarding solution, leading to a formed cellulose product with enhanced fire resistance properties. These methods showcase sustainable and effective ways to make cellulose fireproof for various applications.
What is effect of pH in removal PFAS usingnanofiltration?
5 answers
The pH plays a crucial role in the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) using nanofiltration. Lower pH values near the membrane isoelectric point enhance solute exclusions, particularly for compounds like perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The study also highlights that pH is the most effective parameter for predicting PFAS removal, emphasizing its significance in the process. Additionally, the performance of PFAS rejection significantly increased with the application of an electric field in the same direction as filtration, showcasing the importance of electro-oxidation processes in PFAS removal. Moreover, the impact of pH on PFAS removal efficiency is evident in the study analyzing the effects of PFAS molecular structure and coexisting natural organic matter (NOM) during nanofiltration treatment.
What are the different types of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) ?
5 answers
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass various categories of surface treatment chemicals. Non-polymeric PFAS, like perfluoroalkyl acids and precursors, have been extensively studied for their environmental occurrence and health impacts. On the other hand, polymeric PFAS include fluoropolymers, perfluoropolyethers, and side-chain fluorinated polymers (SCFPs), which are considered "polymers of low concern" by industries but still contribute significantly to environmental contamination. PFAS are known for their high thermal and chemical stability due to the strong carbon-fluorine bond, making them persistent and challenging to remove from the environment. PFAS variants commonly studied include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and others. The distribution and occurrence of PFAS, such as PFOS, in road dust samples across different regions in India highlight the environmental impacts of industrialization and urbanization on PFAS levels.
What is the effect of pH on flux rejection PFAS using polyamide membrane?
5 answers
The effect of pH on flux rejection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) using polyamide membranes is crucial for efficient separation processes. Research has shown that pH stability plays a significant role in enhancing rejection performance. Additionally, the pH near the membrane's isoelectric point influences solute exclusions, particularly for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), by minimizing the presence of protonated organic compounds in the membrane domain. Furthermore, adjusting the pH within specific ranges can lead to the formation of roughness structures in polyamide membranes, affecting water permeability and solute rejection. These findings highlight the importance of pH control in optimizing flux rejection of PFAS using polyamide membranes, emphasizing the need for tailored pH conditions for efficient separation processes.
Are harvesting residues used to produce plant biostimulants by liquid extraction??
5 answers
Harvesting residues are indeed utilized in the production of plant biostimulants through liquid extraction processes. Various studies have highlighted the potential of different sources for biostimulant extraction. For instance, one study focused on extracting liquid biostimulants from freshwater green macroalgae, Oedogonium intermedium, cultivated in a land-based system. Another research project discussed the extraction of biostimulants from edible fungus residue, emphasizing the reduction of resource input and overall expenditure in the planting industry. Additionally, the valorization of by-products for the development of biostimulants has been explored, showcasing the effectiveness of waste-derived materials like vermicompost, composted urban waste, and protein hydrolysates in agriculture and horticulture. These findings collectively demonstrate the utilization of harvesting residues in producing plant biostimulants through liquid extraction methods.
Does zeolite dope chitosan structure is destroyed by acid/ base treatment?
5 answers
The structure of zeolite-doped chitosan is not destroyed by acid/base treatment; instead, it undergoes modifications enhancing its properties. Acid activation of zeolite reduces Ca, Al, and Sr content, facilitating chitosan adsorption. Chitosan-modified zeolite effectively sorbs heavy metal cations without structural damage. Zeolite-filled chitosan membranes exhibit denser structures and higher permeation flux, with optimal zeolite content at 0.1wt% to maintain separation factor. Acid treatment of hierarchical porous-structured zeolite samples stabilizes the lattice, preventing decationation and dealumination. Chitosan prepared with specific molecular weight and deacetylation can be dissolved in acid and alkali, avoiding degradation issues and expanding its applications. Overall, acid/base treatments enhance the functionality of zeolite-doped chitosan without causing structural destruction.
What is hydro-cracking?
5 answers
Hydrocracking is a refining process used to convert heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks into lighter, more valuable products. It involves the use of hydrogen and catalysts to break down large molecules into smaller ones, producing products like naphtha, diesel, and aviation kerosene. The process typically includes hydrogenation pretreatment followed by hydrocracking reactions, with varying hydrogen partial pressures in different reaction zones. Catalysts play a crucial role in hydrocracking, with formulations containing metal active ingredients and molecular sieves to enhance cracking efficiency. The resulting products are then separated through fractional distillation to obtain desired fractions like light fuels and heavy streams containing valuable components like benzene and toluene. Overall, hydrocracking is a vital process in the petroleum industry for upgrading heavy feedstocks into high-value products.