How accurate is the XN-31 Hematology Analyser for the detection of malaria?
Best insight from top research papers
The XN-31 Hematology Analyser has shown high accuracy in detecting malaria. It can identify Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes, provide species differentiation, and stage-specific parasite counts in venous blood samples without any preparation. The sensitivity and specificity of the XN-31p with capillary blood samples were 0.857 and 1.000, respectively, when compared to PCR . The XN-31 analyser demonstrated higher sensitivity than rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in detecting Plasmodium falciparum strains carrying deletion of the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes . It also showed a high correlation coefficient with parasitaemia counted under microscopic observation and could predict the species and developmental stages of the parasites . These results indicate that the XN-31 Hematology Analyser is a reliable tool for the rapid and accurate detection of malaria, making it valuable for clinical diagnosis .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The XN-31p Hematology Analyser showed high sensitivity (1.000) and specificity (0.986-1.000) in detecting Plasmodium infections, making it an accurate diagnostic method for malaria. | |
| The XN-31p Hematology Analyzer showed high accuracy for the detection of malaria parasites, with a positive coincidence rate of 0.848 compared to the nested PCR method. | |
| The XN-31 Hematology Analyzer is highly sensitive for the detection of malaria, including strains with deleted genes encoding histidine-rich proteins. | |
| The XN-31p haematology analyser showed high sensitivity (1.000) and specificity (0.986-1.000) for the detection of Plasmodium infections, making it an accurate diagnostic method for malaria. | |
| The paper does not provide information about the accuracy of the XN-31 Hematology Analyser for the detection of malaria. |
Related Questions
What is the accuracy of automated hematology analyzers in detecting different types of blood cells?4 answersAutomated hematology analyzers exhibit high accuracy in detecting various types of blood cells. Studies have shown that these analyzers provide reliable results for parameters such as RBC, HGB, WBC, HCT, MCV, MCH, and different types of white blood cells. They offer rapid and precise enumeration of nucleated red blood cells (NRBC) with minimal false-negative and false-positive rates, enhancing efficiency in reporting. Moreover, the cell population data (CPD) obtained from modern analyzers can aid in the detection of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) by providing valuable diagnostic information, leading to faster and more accurate diagnoses. Despite encountering occasional unreliable results, laboratories can address these issues by recognizing the causes and implementing strategies to ensure result reliability.
What is the accuracy of the new blood test for detecting Alzheimer's disease compared to traditional diagnostic methods?4 answersThe new blood test for detecting Alzheimer's disease has shown high accuracy compared to traditional diagnostic methods. The test, known as the ALZpath plasma pTau217 Simoa assay, accurately identifies biological AD with reproducible cut-offs across different cohorts. It has been found to have high accuracy in detecting abnormal amyloid and tau pathology, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97. The accuracy of this blood test is comparable to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, which are currently considered the gold standard for AD diagnosis. Additionally, the test can detect longitudinal changes in pTau217 levels, including at the preclinical stage of AD. This blood test is the first widely available, accessible, and scalable option for pTau217 detection, making it a promising tool for the early and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
What new methods are being developed to diagnose malaria?4 answersNew methods being developed to diagnose malaria include the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning models. These models, such as CNN, ResNet50, and VGG19, have shown promising results in recognizing the Plasmodium parasite in thick blood smear images. Additionally, molecular-based diagnostics such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) are being explored for their high sensitivity even at low parasite density. Other approaches include the integration of denoising and image segmentation techniques with Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) as a data augmentation technique. Nanotechnology is also being investigated as a potential tool for malaria detection. These new methods aim to improve the speed, accuracy, and accessibility of malaria diagnosis, addressing the limitations of traditional techniques such as microscopy.
What are the current methods for diagnosis of malaria?5 answersThe current methods for the diagnosis of malaria include microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), molecular-based diagnostics such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and digital imaging analysis using deep learning and artificial intelligence methods. Microscopy and RDTs are the gold standard techniques but have limitations in terms of sensitivity and time consumption. Molecular-based diagnostics like PCR and LAMP are highly sensitive even at low parasitemia but face challenges in resource-constrained regions. Digital imaging analysis using deep learning and artificial intelligence methods, as well as smartphone applications, offer a fast and low-cost diagnosis. These methods have the potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of malaria diagnosis, especially in endemic areas. Overall, there is a need for simple, fast, and reliable point-of-care diagnostic tools to support malaria control and elimination efforts.
What are the factors affecting the accuracy of the model in predicting malaria?4 answersFactors affecting the accuracy of the model in predicting malaria include socio-demographic, environmental, and clinical features. Other factors include the quality of health workers, mosquito nets, condition of the living environment, knowledge, attitudes, actions, use of mosquito coils, use of topical insect repellent, and access to health workers. Additionally, socioeconomic factors such as lower income, living conditions, distance to health facilities, and availability and use of mosquito nets, as well as climatic and environmental factors such as land surface temperature, rainfall, humidity, and vegetation index, significantly contribute to malaria outbreaks. Non-seasonal changes in climate factors such as precipitation, temperature, and surface radiation also play a role in the outbreak of malaria.
What is the accuracy rate of RBC-based malaria detection?5 answersThe accuracy rate of RBC-based malaria detection varies across the different papers. B. M. Hemanth Kumar et al. proposed a photonic biosensor for malaria detection with a sensitivity for change in refractive index of 225 nm/RIU. Subrata Sarkar et al. developed a shallow CNN architecture that achieved the same classification accuracy as VGG-16 and Resnet-50 models for thin blood smear RBC slide images, but with a significantly decreased computational run time. Another paper by Md. Mohidul Hasan Sifat et al. used U-Net for RBC segmentation, CNN for infected RBC detection, and VGG16 for malaria species and stage recognition, achieving a detection accuracy of 100% for infected RBCs. Unfortunately, the specific accuracy rate for RBC-based malaria detection was not mentioned in the abstracts provided.