Search or ask a question

How can systems thinking efect climate change?

Corporate governance

Critical thinking

Context (archaeology)

Best insight from top research papers

Systems thinking can significantly impact climate change by enhancing decision-making processes and understanding the interconnectedness of various factors. It can help in assessing the effects of climate change on organizations and guiding adaptation strategies. Additionally, systems thinking is associated with a pro-environmental orientation and can foster acceptance of climate science across different political ideologies. By incorporating systems thinking into governance at all levels, it becomes possible to break free from historical constraints and address climate and biodiversity emergencies effectively. Moreover, educating future leaders through higher education on systems-related competencies, particularly in the context of climate change, can prepare them to tackle complex issues like climate change more effectively.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Journal Article•DOI Examining undergraduate students’ systems thinking competency through a problem scenario in the context of climate change education Shu-Chiu Liu 08 Sep 2022-Environmental Education Research 1 Citations	Systems thinking competency among undergraduate students can positively impact addressing climate change by enhancing their ability to understand and tackle complex systemic issues related to environmental challenges.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview Matthew T. Ballew, Matthew H. Goldberg, Seth A. Rosenthal, Abel Gustafson, Anthony Leiserowitz - Show less +4 more 23 Apr 2019-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 32 Citations	Systems thinking indirectly influences climate change beliefs by fostering an ecological worldview, promoting pro-environmental attitudes, and supporting the adoption of climate science across political ideologies.
Book Chapter•DOI Utilising the Systems Thinking Approach to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Organisations 16 Sep 2022	Systems thinking can assess climate change impacts on organizations by analyzing internal and external interactions. It helps understand the effects of climate change on systems and their environments.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Systems Thinking in an era of climate change: Does cognitive neuroscience hold the key to improving environmental decision making? A perspective on Climate-Smart Agriculture Baqir Lalani, Steven Gray, Tora Mitra-Ganguli - Show less +2 more 27 Apr 2023-Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience	Systems thinking can improve environmental decision-making in climate change scenarios by enhancing adaptation strategies, especially in low-income countries, through cognitive neuroscience tools and social science frameworks.
Open access•Book The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking: Governance in a Climate Emergency Ray Ison, Ed Straw - Show less +1 more 05 Mar 2020 32 Citations	Systems thinking can effectively address climate change by integrating it into governance at all levels, breaking free from historical limitations, and implementing 21 principles for systemic governance.

My columns

Related Questions

How ai help in climate change?4 answersArtificial Intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in addressing climate change by offering solutions across various sectors. AI aids in enhancing energy efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, optimizing power systems, and improving weather forecasting. It enables better quantification of climate change-induced hazards, impacts, and risks, facilitating the translation of climate data into actionable information for building resilience. By combining AI with climate-economic simulations, international frameworks can be designed to promote collaboration and compliance with climate agreements, considering climate-economic dynamics and strategic behaviors. Moreover, AI applications extend to environmental sustainability, supporting efforts in natural resource conservation, energy management, wildlife protection, pollution control, and agriculture, among others. However, it is essential to address the carbon and energy footprint of AI technologies themselves to ensure sustainable development.

How does design thinking influence systems thinking methodologies?5 answersDesign thinking significantly impacts systems thinking methodologies by enhancing the generation of innovative solutions. Integrating design thinking into systems engineering processes leads to a structured design thinking framework, which combines the strengths of both methodologies. The core concepts of design, such as composition, orchestration, and open-ended design strategies, are crucial in systemic design, emphasizing the importance of incorporating design principles into systems thinking. Furthermore, design thinking, being human-behavior-based, aligns well with the advancements in digital technologies, offering immense potential to enhance the value of products and services through intuitive human-machine interactions. By merging design thinking with systems thinking, a more holistic and innovative approach to problem-solving and system design can be achieved, benefiting from the strengths of both methodologies.

What is Systems Thinking Theoretical definition?5 answersSystems thinking is a theoretical approach that views systems holistically, emphasizing the interrelationships between the components of a complex system beyond their individual parts. It traces its intellectual roots back to holistic thinkers like Aristotle and Lao Tsu and has been influenced by disciplines such as systems theory and management science. This approach recognizes that complex human systems exhibit purposefulness, self-organization, feedback loops, and non-linear causality, highlighting the importance of understanding the dynamics and interactions within a system. Systems thinking is described as a language that employs various tools, models, and theories to analyze complex systems effectively, making it increasingly relevant in addressing global and public health challenges.

Can systems thinking help in organziational change management?5 answersSystems thinking can be beneficial in organizational change management. It allows for a holistic and systematic approach to understanding how different entities interact and influence the overall system operation. By incorporating both soft systems thinking (SST) and critical systems thinking (CST), the application process of systems thinking can be enriched, leading to successful implementation in organizational operations. Systems thinking tools, such as Current Reality Tree (CRT), Evaporating Cloud (EC), Future Reality Tree (FRT), Negative Branch Reservation (NBR), and Prerequisite Tree (PRT), can be applied to overcome resistance and gain stakeholder buy-in for change initiatives. Additionally, systems thinking can contribute to social learning and facilitate the change process by incorporating methods like quality improvement and group facilitation. Furthermore, organizational infrastructure plays a significant role in organizational behavior and can influence the success of change initiatives, highlighting the need for systems thinking to consider the interplay between ideas, infrastructure, and behavior.

How can system thinking be used to improve the quality of education?5 answersSystem thinking can be used to improve the quality of education by providing a structured framework for understanding and analyzing education systems. This framework helps identify problems and find solutions to overcome them. Infusing systems thinking activities in pre-college education allows students to analyze complex problems and enhances learning by making it more student-centered and active. The implementation of systemic thinking in educational institutions can cultivate self-confidence, increase motivation, and improve the quality of education. Taking a systems thinking approach can help bridge the gap between theory and practice in education, leading to more effective implementation of educational reforms. In higher education, systems thinking can be used to understand the relationships between different elements that influence the quality of student learning and achievement. By using a systems thinking perspective, educational efforts can be analyzed and improved to achieve better educational outcomes.

How can system thinking be used to improve student learning?5 answersSystem thinking can be used to improve student learning by infusing systems thinking activities in pre-college education, such as using behavior over time graphs and stock-flow diagrams to analyze real-world problems and enhance learning in the classroom. Additionally, project-based learning that incorporates system thinking skills can develop students' ability to view problems from various perspectives and find sustainable solutions, encouraging responsible actions. In the context of medical education, encouraging students to ask questions on asynchronous discussion forums can support their systems thinking development, leading to improved understanding of complex systems. Systems thinking insights can also be applied to study education during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, helping to identify underlying systemic structures and interventions that can enhance student learning and minimize online distractions. Finally, systems thinking enables principals to demonstrate instructional leadership and nurture learning-focused schools by examining and improving complex systems within the school setting.

See what other people are reading

Are fast myofibers are more sensitive to disease and atrophy than slow muscles?

Fast myofibers are indeed more susceptible to damage and disease compared to slow muscles. Research suggests that in conditions like Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), fast muscle fibers are particularly vulnerable to mechanical stress-induced injury and fiber breakdown, exacerbating the pathology of the disease. Therapies promoting a slower, more oxidative phenotype could protect muscles from damage and ameliorate dystrophic progression, potentially improving patient quality of life. Additionally, epigenetic mechanisms play a role in maintaining muscle fiber-type specificity, with distinct CpG methylation patterns observed between fast and slow myofibers, influencing gene expression and alternative promoter usage in a myofiber type-specific manner. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted treatments for neuromuscular disorders that take into account the differential impact on fast and slow myofibers.What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of using AI-assisted tools for teaching manual skills in art education?

Integrating AI-assisted tools in art education offers benefits like enhanced creativity, prompt engineering, and iterative processes. However, challenges include ethical concerns regarding copyright, potential artist replacement, and limitations in replicating outputs from different AI tools. AI tools can inspire teachers to explore the unique nature of crafts but also raise issues like algorithmic bias, copyright violations, and black-boxing creativity. The technology's ability to create hyper-realistic images poses risks to democracy through the difficulty in distinguishing AI-generated from real images. Despite these drawbacks, AI in education can lead to personalized learning, improved assessment, and reduced planning time for teachers, emphasizing the need for further research and student preparation for a future dominated by AI.How does regular exercise impact the diversity and stability of the gut microbiome?

Regular exercise has been shown to have a nuanced impact on the diversity and stability of the gut microbiome, with effects varying by age, body mass index (BMI), and exercise intensity. In older adults, exercise interventions did not significantly alter diversity metrics in most studies, though some bacteria showed higher abundance at the genus and species levels after an exercise program. This suggests that while broad diversity may remain stable, specific beneficial bacteria can increase with regular physical activity in older populations. In middle-aged adults, the impact of physical activity (PA) on gut microbiota composition was found to be BMI-dependent. Overweight individuals did not show the same beneficial increases in commensal taxa associated with high PA duration as seen in normal-weight participants. This indicates that while exercise can influence gut microbiota, the effects are modulated by an individual's metabolic status. A systematic review of longitudinal exercise interventions highlighted that moderate to high-intensity exercise for a minimum of 8 weeks is likely to produce changes in the gut microbiota across both healthy and clinical populations. Furthermore, an increase in weekly minutes spent in active transportation was associated with an increase in alpha diversity, suggesting that even non-intensive physical activities contribute to a richer and more diverse gut microbiome. Research in urban Chinese individuals showed that regular exercise was significantly associated with β-diversity but not α-diversity, indicating that exercise may influence the overall community composition rather than the number of species present. Physical activity has also been linked to increased microbial variance and a beneficial Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, which could help counteract obesity progression. The microbiome-mitochondria axis highlights how exercise-induced microbial by-products can enhance mitochondrial capacity, suggesting a complex interplay between exercise, gut microbiota, and overall health. Exercise's effect on gut microbiota composition and function, including the presence of health-promoting species and metabolic pathways, varies with exercise intensity, especially in clinical populations such as those with type 2 diabetes. This body of research collectively underscores the multifaceted relationship between regular exercise and the gut microbiome, emphasizing the importance of physical activity in maintaining gut microbiome diversity and stability across different populations and lifestyles.What are the symptoms of ecological grief?

Ecological grief manifests as an intense feeling of longing and mourning due to ecological losses like deforestation, wildlife loss, and climate change-related impacts. Researchers studying ecosystems affected by climate change also experience emotional tolls. Disasters like tailing dam bursts lead to abstract losses related to attachment to disappearing aspects of life, contributing to ecological grief. Despite being a common response to socioecological losses, Western cultures lack shared spaces to engage with ecological grief, highlighting a problematic conception of nature. Symptoms of ecological grief include emotional responses such as sadness, mourning, and a sense of loss triggered by environmental degradation, climate change impacts, and biodiversity loss, particularly affecting vulnerable populations like the youth in climate-vulnerable countries.How do subtitle effects influence viewer engagement and retention in videos?

Subtitle effects play a crucial role in viewer engagement and retention in videos. Research indicates that the design of subtitles, including typographical features like size, color, and position, can significantly impact retention and recall of content. Different types of subtitles, such as bilingual subtitles, can affect viewers' visual attention distribution, cognitive load, and overall comprehension of video content. Moreover, the type of subtitling used can influence vocabulary acquisition and retention, with inconclusive results on the most effective type. Reversed subtitles, where the audio is in the viewer's native language and subtitles in a foreign language, have shown distinct advantages for L2 vocabulary retention. Understanding how various subtitle features influence engagement and retention is essential for educators and material developers to enhance learning outcomes in audiovisual contexts.How does the application of scientific methods influence the determination of scientific discipline?

The application of scientific methods significantly impacts the determination of scientific disciplines by enhancing the understanding and implementation of research processes. Scientific approaches, such as Multicriteria analysis, Designing Process, and empirical methods like observation and document review, play a crucial role in shaping the methodology and organization of scientific research. These methods aid in mastering knowledge, developing practical skills, and formulating research goals and tasks effectively. Understanding various scientific research methodologies, including experimental, observational, survey, case study, and correlational research, is essential for addressing research questions accurately and advancing scientific knowledge. The thorough application of these methods by science teachers contributes to creating an active and efficient learning process, ultimately influencing the quality and depth of scientific disciplines.What are the current ethical guidelines and regulations governing the development and use of artificial intelligence?

Current ethical guidelines and regulations governing the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) are crucial due to the emerging challenges and opportunities posed by AI technologies. The European Union emphasizes regulations respecting freedom and human rights, contrasting with approaches in the US and China. Ethical concerns surrounding AI development include bias, privacy, accountability, and transparency, necessitating collaboration among stakeholders for effective implementation of ethical guidelines. Companies are increasingly integrating ethical concerns into their AI infrastructure, leading to a surge in ethics codes, prompting the need to assess the authenticity of their interest in AI ethics. To address these challenges, there is a growing demand for new frameworks, institutional arrangements, and regulations to govern AI technologies while balancing public safety, human rights, and innovation.Why is the intercept value negative for intraparticle diffusion model?

The intercept value in the intraparticle diffusion model is negative due to the phenomenon of negative transfer, which can lead to performance degradation in diffusion-based generative models. This negative transfer arises from conflicts between tasks, causing a decrease in task affinity as the noise levels widen. In the context of heterogeneous media, diffusion in intraparticle space is slower compared to interparticle space, affecting mass transfer velocity and equilibrium conditions. Additionally, in the FTS/WGS process over catalysts, the diffusivity in liquid wax-filled pores is much lower than in the gas phase, resulting in lower effectiveness factors for gas/liquid systems. Furthermore, when studying adsorption kinetics on carbon nanotubes-titania materials, the intraparticle diffusion mechanism can indicate that intraparticle diffusion is not the sole rate-controlling step.What are the psychological factors that contribute to the effectiveness of femvertising?

Psychological factors contributing to the effectiveness of femvertising include perceived women empowerment, gender role equality attitude, and reduced psychological reactance among female consumers. Femvertising, by projecting women authentically and closely, increases purchase intention and decreases psychological reactance compared to conventional ads. Additionally, consumers' degree of rurality and preference for specific ad types, such as "funny," "with a message," and "emotional," are associated with a more positive attitude toward femvertising. The study also highlights that femvertising appeals are relatively effective across rural-urban divides, indicating a positive reception of gender equality messaging in advertising. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding psychological factors like empowerment, gender attitudes, and consumer preferences in crafting successful femvertising campaigns.What is the current state of research on the link between fear vs. hope and collective protest?

Current research on the link between fear and hope in collective protest reveals nuanced insights. Studies show that fear of repression by authorities can motivate protest participation, especially in contexts where resistance faces significant repression. Conversely, the emotional impact of policing, such as fear of police actions, can trigger anger and rebellion among affected communities. Additionally, the perception of threat by association and beliefs in Western conspiracy can lead to collective protests against minority groups, driven by fear of external threats. However, findings also suggest that hope, in the form of interest in protest movements, plays a significant role in driving participation, while the impact of collective identity on protest behavior may have been overestimated due to misidentification of interest as identity.What has been done to control lionfish?

Efforts to control lionfish populations have included various strategies. In the Western Atlantic and Mediterranean, management approaches have been explored, such as routine removals by spearfishing with scuba, encouraging the development of recreational and commercial lionfish fisheries, and engaging local communities in removal efforts. Additionally, promoting the consumption of lionfish on a local commercial scale has been considered as a strategy to control the invasion, with studies showing the average fillet yield of red lionfish to be around 30-36% of the total wet body weight. Community involvement has also been crucial, as seen in Utila, Honduras, where efforts involved educating the public, certifying divers for hunting, and creating economic opportunities through lionfish removals. Further research and testing on lionfish traps have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility of a deepwater fishery for invasive lionfish.