How does capacity building impact the sustainability of NTFP resources and the livelihoods of local communities?
Best insight from top research papers
Capacity building plays a crucial role in enhancing the sustainability of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) and the livelihoods of local communities. By empowering vulnerable societies through traditional knowledge and active participation in forest resource management, communities can achieve stable and secure livelihoods. Sustainable harvesting systems and agroforestry practices, guided by local wisdom, help maintain NTFP availability and prevent overexploitation, ensuring future income sources. However, despite NTFPs contributing to income generation, further capacity building is needed to ensure that the income generated is sufficient to sustain livelihoods. Therefore, integrating capacity building initiatives that focus on traditional knowledge, sustainable practices, and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms is essential for promoting the long-term sustainability of NTFP resources and improving the well-being of local communities.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
2 Citations | Capacity building is crucial for sustainable NTFP resources and local livelihoods. The study highlights the need for further research to enhance equitable benefits sharing among stakeholders for improved outcomes. |
| Capacity building enhances sustainability by optimizing natural capital through diverse NTFP products, supporting regenerative economies, and categorizing enterprises as quite sustainable, benefiting local livelihoods in Indonesian forested areas. | |
| Capacity building through indigenous knowledge enhances sustainable management of NTFPs like dragon’s blood and cinnamon in Southern Sumatra, safeguarding resources and improving local livelihoods in Indonesia. | |
01 Jan 2022 | Capacity building empowers local communities through NTFP utilization, enhancing livelihood sustainability. It enables resilience, resource productivity, and future-oriented resource management, crucial for sustainable development. |
Related Questions
What are the key factors that influence community participation in NTFP management?5 answersKey factors influencing community participation in non-timber forest product (NTFP) management include income level, number of owned cattle, age, awareness, experience, and sex. Additionally, factors such as being married, income from NTFPs, membership of forest users' association, and forest conservation positively influence market participation in NTFPs. Conversely, being male, older, having higher education levels, engaging in farming activities, and having higher non-farm income can negatively impact NTFP market participation. Lack of knowledge of existing policies, uncontrolled trade by non-resident collectors, and weak national policies contribute to threats to forest biodiversity and hinder community participation in NTFP management. To enhance community involvement, secure land rights enabling community-led conservation and increased local participation throughout project phases are recommended.
What are the positive effects of Sustainable livelihood program under 4ps to the beneficiaries?5 answersThe positive effects of the Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) under the 4Ps program on the beneficiaries include poverty reduction, social development, financial management, livelihood empowerment, improvement in economic and social development, personal satisfaction, and peace development. The SLP provides grants and support to marginalized Filipinos, particularly women, enabling them to generate new sources of income and support their daily needs. The program also improves the well-being and socioeconomic status of the beneficiaries, as well as their access to basic needs. Additionally, the SLP contributes to positive peace development within households and communities, motivating beneficiaries to support and sustain the program. The program has a significant effect on the academic performance of student beneficiaries, motivating them to attend classes and improving their socio-economic status. Overall, the SLP has a positive impact on the lives of the beneficiaries, providing them with opportunities for economic and social development, and improving their satisfaction and well-being.
What is the role of community capacity building in In the face of local community crises؟?5 answersCommunity capacity building plays a crucial role in addressing local community crises. Local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have the knowledge and proximity to identify problems and assist affected communities in addressing them. These NGOs use emotional empowerment as a method to build capacity in communities, providing a sense of care, spaces for voicing feelings and challenges, and support for transforming voices into community action. Teachers also play a role in community capacity building by supporting students facing adversity and trauma, which has a significant impact on classroom culture, learning, and safety. Community-based research, grounded in participatory and transformative paradigms, recognizes the value of local knowledge in complementing propositional theories and contributes to capacity building for social change. In the face of trauma, community partnerships can build capacity by disseminating trauma-informed education and training, engaging with the community, and linking community members to resources. These efforts have shown success in improving coping strategies, external help-seeking, and community connectedness, even in the face of crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
What are the important aspects of sustainable livelihood framework?5 answersThe important aspects of the sustainable livelihood framework include the context of livelihood, assets, institutions, strategies, and outcomes. The context of livelihood refers to the specific conditions and environment in which livelihoods are pursued. Assets encompass the five capital assets: human, financial, physical, natural, and social, which are essential for sustaining livelihoods. Institutions refer to the structures and processes that shape livelihood opportunities and outcomes. Strategies are the actions and approaches employed by households to achieve their livelihood objectives. Outcomes are the results and impacts of livelihood activities. The sustainable livelihood framework provides a holistic and multidimensional approach to understanding and assessing livelihoods, taking into account various factors and dimensions that influence livelihood sustainability.
What is sustainable livelihood framework>?4 answersThe sustainable livelihood framework is a conceptual tool used to understand and assess the various dimensions of livelihoods in different contexts. It considers the different assets or capitals that households possess, including human, financial, physical, natural, and social capital. The framework also takes into account the strategies employed by households to cope with shocks and stresses, as well as the outcomes or impacts of these strategies on livelihood sustainability. The framework has been applied in various contexts, such as market-driven rural development projects, tuberculosis-affected households, rural households in the Migori River watershed, livelihoods in the Qin-Ba Mountain area, and community-based ecotourism ventures. It provides a holistic and multidimensional approach to understanding and assessing livelihoods, and can be used as a practical tool for policymakers and researchers to inform interventions and prioritize resources for sustainable development.
Does government policies affect the financial sustainability of local NGOs?4 answersGovernment policies can have an impact on the financial sustainability of local NGOs. In Kenya, the government introduced legislation in 2013 that capped the amount of foreign funding to NGOs at 15% of their budget, which further strained the already limited supply of foreign funding. This has led to a situation where the demand for funding exceeds the available resources, making it challenging for NGOs to sustain their operations. Additionally, the study conducted in Zimbabwe found that the government was not funding local NGOs, further contributing to their financial unsustainability. Therefore, government policies, such as funding restrictions, can significantly influence the financial sustainability of local NGOs.