How does federated learning improve the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches?
Best insight from top research papers
Federated learning (FL) improves the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches. FL enables collaborative learning among multiple clients (hospitals) in a privacy-preserving fashion, allowing the aggregation of knowledge from different datasets without sharing data . This is particularly beneficial in the case of brain tumor classification, where datasets are usually small and combining them from different hospitals is necessary . FL has been shown to significantly boost the predictive performance of local hospitals with missing acquisition timepoints, while benefiting from other hospitals with available data at those timepoints . Additionally, FL allows for the training of a central deep learning model without requiring data sharing, ensuring data privacy . The proposed FL schemes, such as 4D-FED-GNN+ and 4D-FED-GNN++, have demonstrated superior performance in brain tumor classification compared to benchmark methods .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not discuss brain tumor classification or compare federated learning with centralized learning approaches. | |
| Federated learning improves the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches by achieving a higher classification result without exchanging data with other clients. | |
| The provided paper does not mention anything about federated learning or its comparison to centralized learning approaches. | |
| Federated learning (FL) in the proposed scheme achieves competitive performance with a slight decrease in average test accuracy compared to centralized learning (CL) approaches for brain tumor classification. | |
| The provided paper does not mention how federated learning improves the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches. |
Related Questions
Can federated learning not be used for neural networks?5 answersFederated Learning (FL) can indeed be utilized for training neural networks, addressing challenges like computational requirements and data privacy concerns. FL enables collaborative training across distributed devices, but issues arise when applying FL to deeper neural networks due to "divergence accumulation," causing performance decline. To overcome this, guidelines like using wider models and reducing the receptive field can significantly enhance the accuracy of FL on deeper models. Additionally, a model-agnostic FL method for decentralized data with a network structure has been proposed, emphasizing similarities between local datasets and models for improved predictions. Therefore, FL can be effectively employed for training neural networks, especially when tailored approaches are implemented to address specific challenges.
How does federated learning improve the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches?5 answersFederated Learning (FL) improves the accuracy of brain tumor classification compared to centralized learning approaches. FL allows multiple devices to train a local model using local data, and the gradients of the local model are then sent to a central server which aggregates them to create a global model. This decentralized approach ensures data privacy as the data never leaves the local device. To ensure the data quality of local training data, FL can use blockchain technology to validate each local model by checking its accuracy against a secret testing dataset. FL has been successfully applied to train a brain tumor classification system using decentralized data without exchanging sensitive data, achieving high classification accuracy on both independently and non-independently distributed data. FL has also been used for glioma and its molecular subtype classification, showing good performance and the potential to replace central learning approaches. Additionally, a federated network using FL has been established for multi-institutional collaboration in neurosurgery, achieving high accuracy in predicting intracranial hemorrhage.
What is the difference between federated learning and centralized learning?5 answersFederated learning is a decentralized machine learning paradigm that allows multiple clients to collaborate by leveraging local computational power and the models transmission. This method reduces the costs and privacy concerns associated with centralized machine learning methods while ensuring data privacy by distributing training data across heterogeneous devices. On the other hand, centralized learning refers to the traditional approach where all the training data is stored and processed in a central server. In centralized learning, the data is not distributed across devices, and the training is performed on a single server. The main difference between federated learning and centralized learning is the distribution of data and computation. Federated learning distributes the training data and computation across multiple devices, while centralized learning performs training on a single server.
How can deep learning methods be used to improve the segmentation and classification of brain tumors in MRI images?5 answersDeep learning methods have been used to improve the segmentation and classification of brain tumors in MRI images. These methods aim to automate the process, which is currently time-consuming and requires specialized expertise. The U-Net model is commonly used for segmentation of MRI images, while Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are used for classifying brain tumors. Various deep learning models, such as VGG16, VGG19, MobileNetV2, Inception, ResNet50, EfficientNetb7, InceptionResnetV2, DenseNet201, and DenseNet121, have been applied as encoders in the U-Net architecture to achieve accurate segmentation. Performance metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall are used to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches. The recurrent residual U-Net, which uses the Adam optimizer, has shown promising results and outperforms other state-of-the-art models with a Mean Intersection Over Union of 0.8665. These deep learning techniques provide accurate and effective segmentation and classification of brain tumors, aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of patients.
Can deep learning methods be used to improve the classification of brain tumors in MRI images?5 answersDeep learning methods have shown promising effectiveness in improving the classification of brain tumors in MRI images. Various deep learning models, such as U-Net, DenseNet, ResNetV2, InceptionResNetv2, and Recurrent Residual U-Net, have been applied for this purpose. Transfer learning algorithms, including DenseNet, ResNetV2, and InceptionResNetv2, have been used to achieve high accuracy in multi-classification of brain tumors. The proposed hybrid model, which combines DBN and Bi-LSTM, has also shown promising results in tumor classification. Additionally, the use of federated learning algorithms, such as Federated Averaging (FedAvg), has been explored to train brain tumor classification systems using decentralized data without compromising privacy and security. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning methods in improving the classification of brain tumors in MRI images.
How can federated learning algorithms be used to improve the performance of machine learning models?5 answersFederated learning algorithms can improve the performance of machine learning models by enabling large-scale training without exposing raw data. They preserve privacy information and achieve high learning performance. In traditional machine learning, the central server collects private data, but federated learning allows data to be kept at local devices, addressing concerns about data privacy. Adaptive optimization methods, such as Adagrad, Adam, and Yogi, have been proposed for federated learning and have shown significant improvements in performance. Incentive mechanisms are crucial to motivate participants in federated learning. Fair incentive mechanisms, such as FIFL, reward reliable and efficient workers while punishing malicious ones, leading to increased system revenue. Economic and game theoretic approaches have been used to design incentive mechanisms for federated learning, stimulating data owners to contribute their resources.