How evaluation problem can be solved by using hidden Markov model?
Answers from top 8 papers
More filters
| Papers (8) | Insight |
|---|---|
23 Oct 2006 4 Citations | The results show the validity of the hidden Markov model |
15 Jul 2001 42 Citations | Preliminary results show that the performance of this approach is, at least, similar to that of a standard hidden Markov model trained using the Baum-Welch algorithm. |
| Results show a major improvement on a Hidden Markov Model framework. | |
| It extends previous work on homogeneous Markov chains to more general and applicable hidden Markov models. |
Related Questions
What is evaluation method for inquiry learning model?4 answersEvaluation methods for inquiry learning models vary depending on the specific context and goals of the research. Some papers propose the need for clear evaluation systems that reflect the true characteristics of inquiry-based learning and address the subjectivity of evaluators. Others suggest the use of hybrid evaluation mechanisms that combine traditional assessment methods with self-evaluation and learner feedback. One study focuses on the development of an Open Inquiry Learning Model in Physics (OILMP) and provides a detailed description of the roles of teachers and students in the evaluation process. Another paper discusses the use of experimentation and the assessment of learning outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of the inquiry learning model. Additionally, the evaluation of inquiry learning in different contexts, such as scientific or naturalistic inquiry, may require different approaches and considerations.
Why the paper use Markov model Decision tree in economic evaluation?5 answersThe paper uses a Markov model in economic evaluation because Markov models provide helpful information about value over time, which is important for return-on-investment calculations and other economic statistics that depend on time and efficiency. Markov models operate differently than decision trees as they require more data and time-steps to complete a Markov trace. They can generate analyzable results and provide insights into the long-term effects of interventions, such as vaccine programs. Additionally, Markov models are used to simulate and forecast supply and demand side effects, making them useful in predicting market failures and economic outcomes. Decision tree models, on the other hand, are used for cost-effectiveness evaluation and can assess the quality of rural ecological environment governance by processing data recursively and generating classification rules. Therefore, combining Markov models and decision trees allows for a comprehensive analysis of economic and environmental factors in various fields.
Why researchers do evaluation using different model?5 answersResearchers use different evaluation techniques and metrics to assess models for several reasons. One reason is the need to mimic the human mind accurately, which requires selecting the most suitable model. Additionally, the evaluation of causal modeling algorithms in artificial intelligence is often limited by primitive evaluation techniques, creating a gap between theory and practice. Another factor is the social and economic conditions of the country, which influence the evaluation of researchers and their work. Furthermore, model-driven engineering requires appropriate management technologies, including model comparison, which plays a crucial role in various modeling activities. These different evaluation approaches and metrics allow researchers to assess models from various perspectives, consider different algorithmic advancements, and address specific modeling challenges.
How is a markov chain used in a hidden markov model?3 answersA hidden Markov model (HMM) uses a Markov chain to model signals. Markov chains represent data as a sequence of states in time, where each new state depends only on the previous state. HMMs are a type of Markov chain that incorporate hidden states to solve the problem of incomplete observations. They allow a sequence of observations to determine the real states of the system. HMMs are useful in various applications, such as modeling multivariate processes and non-stationary processes with a life-cycle component. They minimize the information loss between the HMM and the true data-generating process by providing an optimal grid and transition probability matrix. HMMs have been used in diverse fields, including asset-pricing models and life-cycle consumption-savings models. Additionally, HMMs have been applied to determine the behavior of animals, such as sharks, based on their trajectories.
What are some applications of the Hidden Markov Model in computer vision?3 answersHidden Markov Models (HMMs) have various applications in computer vision. One application is in the reconstruction of neuronal processes in brain imaging, where HMMs can automatically trace neuronal processes from sub-micron resolution images. HMMs can also be used in visual inspection tasks, such as analyzing fixations' sequences during quality control inspections. In this application, eye tracking data is gathered, and HMMs are used to analyze the differences between expert and novice operators. Another application is in proximity capacitive sensors for user gesture recognition. HMMs can be used to build models that recognize and classify user gestures in real-time, providing satisfactory response and accuracy. Overall, HMMs offer valuable tools for solving problems related to incomplete observations, noise in measurements, and modeling non-Gaussian data in computer vision applications.
What are the challenges of using REAIM for evaluation?5 answersThe challenges of using the REAIM framework for evaluation include the need for careful interpretation and analysis of data, as well as the potential limitations of data collection methods and the timeliness of data availability. Additionally, there may be difficulties in quantifying and measuring certain performance indicators, which can impact the accuracy of the evaluation. However, when the evaluation is properly conducted, it can lead to increased worker commitment, motivation, and overall efficiency and effectiveness of employees. In the context of community capacity building in schools, the evaluation of the Fit Lifestyle at School and at Home (FLASH) intervention showed that different capacity-building strategies had varying levels of improvement, and stakeholders needed support in areas such as communication and establishing local networks. Furthermore, in the evaluation of the Enhanced health in Care Homes (EHCH) vanguard, it was found that rapid evaluations using interrupted time series (ITS) methods may produce misleading results and misallocate resources, highlighting the need for caution in short-term evaluations of complex interventions.