Search or ask a question

Is flammability test enough for biogas properties identification?

Diffusion flame

Lower flammable limit

Flammability limit

Laminar flame speed

Best insight from top research papers

Flammability testing alone is not enough for identifying the properties of biogas. Biogas is a sustainable and renewable fuel produced in digestion facilities, and its composition typically consists of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. The presence of inhibitors such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen in biogas can significantly affect its flammability characteristics, including the laminar burning velocity and flammability limits. Several research projects have shown that the decrease in the laminar flame speed of a fuel mixture containing dilution components is caused by the increase in specific heat capacity and the decrease in heat release, flame temperature, and thermal diffusivity . Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental combustion characteristics of biogas, including its composition and the presence of inhibitors, is crucial for its safe and efficient use as a fuel .

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Biogas Laminar Burning Velocity and Flammability Characteristics in Spark Ignited Premix Combustion Willyanto Anggono, Ing Wardana, M. Lawes, Kevin J. Hughes, Slamet Wahyudi, Nurkholis Hamidi, Akihiro Hayakawa - Show less +6 more 10 Apr 2013 33 Citations	The paper does not directly address whether a flammability test is enough for biogas properties identification.
Journal Article•DOI Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A literature review Loreto Pizzuti, Cristiane Aparecida Martins, Pedro Teixeira Lacava - Show less +2 more 01 Sep 2016-Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 58 Citations	The provided paper does not directly answer the question about whether flammability tests are enough for identifying biogas properties. The paper primarily focuses on the laminar burning velocity and flammability limits of biogas, but does not discuss the sufficiency of flammability tests for identifying its properties.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Comparative Study on the Rate of Flammability of Biogas and Firewood Saddam Saleh Yusuf, Muhammad Isma’il, Jibrin Abdullahi - Show less +2 more 15 Sep 2020	The paper does not explicitly state whether the flammability test is enough for biogas properties identification.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Laminar burning velocity and flammability characteristics of biogas in spark ignited premix combustion at reduced pressure Willyanto Anggono, Ing Wardana, M. Lawes, Kevin J. Hughes, Slamet Wahyudi, Nurkholis Hamidi - Show less +5 more 25 Jul 2013-Applied Mechanics and Materials 20 Citations	The paper does not directly address whether flammability testing is enough for identifying biogas properties.

My columns

Related Questions

How temperature affect on biogas production?5 answersTemperature plays a crucial role in influencing biogas production. Research indicates that higher temperatures generally lead to increased biogas production. For instance, in anaerobic digestion processes, optimal temperatures ranging from 45 to 65 °C have been found to enhance bio-hythane production and methane bioconversion. Additionally, temperature affects the kinetic rates of microbial species and methane production, with higher temperatures resulting in better performance in biogas production. Studies have shown that temperature management is essential for efficient biogas plant operation, as it influences physical and biochemical processes, such as the hydrolysis rate of feedstock and microbial activity. Therefore, maintaining suitable temperatures is critical for maximizing biogas production efficiency.

What is biogas flame test?5 answersA biogas flame test involves analyzing the combustion characteristics of biogas produced from organic materials through processes like anaerobic digestion. Various studies have explored different aspects of biogas flames, including their turbulent burning velocity, flame structure, emissions performance, and temperature profiles. Experimental data has shown that biogas flames can exhibit different behaviors based on factors like methane percentage, turbulence intensity, and composition of the biogas. The flame height, maximum temperature, and overall combustion performance of biogas flames can vary depending on the type of organic starter material used in the biogas production process. Additionally, investigations into biogas flame propagation in interconnected pipes have highlighted the impact of CO2 presence on flame characteristics and explosion hazards.

What is the efficiency of a Biogas burner Stove?5 answersThe efficiency of a biogas burner stove varies across the different studies. One study found that the thermal efficiency of a domestic biogas stove was approximately 60.01%. Another study recorded a thermal efficiency of about 60% for a developed biogas stove. A different study focused on a top burner cotton-less bioethanol stove and reported a thermal efficiency of 72.21%. The efficiency of an efficient gas stove with an energy-gathering cover was not explicitly mentioned in the abstract. Lastly, a study modifying an LPG stove burner for biogas fuel did not provide specific information on the efficiency of the burner.

Do aromaticity affect flammability of hydrocarbon?5 answersAromaticity does affect the flammability of hydrocarbons. The presence of aromatic compounds in hydrocarbon fuel blends increases the emissions of aromatic species, regardless of the engine operating conditions. The flammability characteristics of pure hydrocarbon fluids can be predicted using a structural group contribution method. This method identifies the structural groups that significantly contribute to the overall flammability characteristics, such as auto-ignition temperature, flash point, and upper and lower flammability limits. The use of hydrocarbon-blown foams in rigid foam applications presents a challenge due to their flammable nature. However, various techniques can be employed to improve the flame resistance of hydrocarbon-blown foams, including the use of fire retardants, co-blowing agents, and increased foam indices.

What are the flammanility limits of hydrogen?5 answersThe flammability limits of hydrogen were found to be influenced by various factors such as initial temperature, ignition energy, and pressure. The addition of hydrogen to isooctane–air mixtures increased the lean flammability limits. In the case of hydrogen-enriched natural gas, the flammability limits were found to be similar to those of methane–hydrogen mixtures with the same hydrogen fraction. The lower flammability limit (LFL) of hydrogen initially decreased with pressure from 1.0 to 0.3 atm and then increased with further decrease of pressure, while the upper flammability limit (UFL) was observed to be inversely proportional to the initial pressure in the range from 1.0 to 0.3 atm and proportional to the initial pressure from 0.3 to 0.05 atm. The flame propagation velocity of hydrogen was larger than that of lower alkanes and ethylene, and it increased when the initial pressure decreased from 1.0 to 0.3 atm.

What is the flammability rating of timber?5 answersTimber has a low heat release rate and is known for its ignition resistance, making it less flammable. The flammability rating of timber can be determined through various tests such as cone calorimeter test, room-corner test, limiting oxygen index (LOI) test, furnace test, and single burning item test (SBI). These tests help in understanding the reaction of timber and timber-based products to fire. Additionally, fire retardant treatments such as impregnation and coatings can be used to enhance the fire resistance of timber. The flammability characteristics of timber can also be influenced by factors such as moisture content and the type of wood used. Overall, timber is considered to have a relatively low flammability rating due to its inherent properties and the potential use of fire retardant treatments.

See what other people are reading

How Does Dynamics of Aluminium Combustion in Air Plasma Flame ?

How Does Dynamics of Aluminium Combustion in Air Plasma Flame ?

Why increasing Height above burner, diffusion flame temperature increasing?

Increasing the height above the burner in a diffusion flame leads to an increase in temperature due to various factors observed in different studies. The variability in flame convection and flame volume increases with height, leading to higher temperatures. Additionally, the use of swirl vanes with different angles in diffusion burners can create turbulence, enhancing mixing between fuel and oxidizer, resulting in higher temperatures as the flame height increases. Furthermore, in a study on ultrashort pulsed plasma discharges, it was found that the stabilizing ability of the discharge in a methane jet diffusion flame diminishes at higher temperatures due to rapid depletion of certain reactive species under elevated temperature conditions, affecting flame stability and temperature.Soot and ash production from ethyne gas combustion why?

Soot production during ethyne (acetylene) combustion is significant due to its role as a precursor in the hydrogen-abstraction acetylene-addition (HACA) mechanism, contributing to soot growth. Experimental studies have shown that soot formation during the pyrolysis of ethylene involves the nucleation of soot particles from polyaromatic hydrocarbon fragments and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, with a kinetic model closely reproducing the soot yield and temperature of soot particles. Additionally, the individual roles of CO, H2, H2O, and CO2 in recycled flue gas have been studied to assess their effectiveness in suppressing or boosting soot formation during the thermal decomposition of ethylene-additive gas mixtures. Direct measurements of soot formation from ethylene flames have revealed bimodal particle nucleation and growth, providing insights into the development of particles under different flame conditions.What is diffrence between steady state and unsteady porous medium simulation?

The difference between steady-state and unsteady porous medium simulations lies primarily in the treatment of time and the flow conditions within the porous medium. In steady-state simulations, the flow conditions such as velocity, pressure, and temperature are assumed to be constant over time. This implies that the system has reached an equilibrium where the inputs and outputs are balanced, leading to time-invariant material property, hydrologic parameters, and computed heads and fluxes. Such models are simpler, requiring fewer input parameters and less computational effort, and they solve for heads at infinite time, generating a single set of output. On the other hand, unsteady (or transient) simulations account for the changes in flow conditions over time. These changes could be due to various factors, including alterations in boundary conditions, source terms, or the physical properties of the porous medium itself. Unsteady models are more complex, requiring the specification of initial conditions, time discretization, and often more extensive calibration data due to the temporal variability of computed heads, fluxes, and possibly hydrologic parameters and boundary conditions. These models can capture the dynamics of the system more accurately, reflecting the natural variability and transient phenomena such as the propagation of pressure waves or the evolution of contaminant plumes. The complexity of unsteady simulations is further highlighted by the need to consider various factors such as the onset of non-linear effects, the applicability of corrections like the Forchheimer term during acceleration in non-linear regimes, and the stability of solutions under complex conditions like those described by the double porosity/permeability model. Moreover, unsteady simulations can provide insights into the effects of transient stresses on the system, which are crucial for accurately modeling and predicting the behavior of porous media systems under changing conditions. In summary, the key difference between steady-state and unsteady simulations in porous media lies in the temporal dimension—steady-state models assume time-invariant conditions, while unsteady models account for the temporal variability and dynamics of the system. This distinction is critical for the accurate modeling and understanding of porous media systems, as it affects the model's complexity, the required input data, and the nature of the results obtained.What elements/compound/composition has researchers used to synthesis cnts with Flame synthesis method for biomedical applications?

Researchers have explored various elements, compounds, and compositions for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) using the flame synthesis method, particularly focusing on applications in the biomedical field. The choice of catalysts and substrates plays a crucial role in the synthesis process, affecting the morphology, purity, and functional properties of the resulting CNTs, which are essential for biomedical applications. Nickel nitrate has been used as a catalyst precursor in the flame synthesis of CNTs, with copper, nickel-chromium, and nickel foam serving as supported substrates. The interaction between the catalyst and these substrates significantly influences the growth mechanism and morphology of CNTs, with copper substrates leading to the highest crystallinity and purity of CNTs. Additionally, nickel substrates, both coated and uncoated with nickel nitrate, have been employed, demonstrating that coated substrates offer advantages in the synthesis process, producing curved and entangled multi-walled CNTs with both straight tubular and bamboo-like structures. For biomedical applications, the synthesis of CNTs from natural sources like date palm seeds, alcohols, and natural gas has been investigated. The Flame Fragments Deposition (FFD) technique, particularly with natural gas, offers a clean synthesis method without the need for catalysts, making it suitable for medical and pharmaceutical applications due to the high adsorption capacity of the synthesized CNTs. Iron/niobium nanocomposite particles have also been produced using a sodium flame and encapsulation process, with ferrocene and niobium chloride vapor. These materials, encapsulated in niobium to prevent oxidation, show promise for biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility and X-ray opacity. In summary, the synthesis of CNTs for biomedical applications using the flame synthesis method has involved a variety of catalysts and substrates, including nickel nitrate, copper, nickel-chromium, nickel foam, and natural sources. The choice of materials influences the structural and functional properties of CNTs, making them suitable for various biomedical applications.How does the Flame synthesis method differ from other synthesis methods for CNTs for biomedical applications?

Flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) presents a distinct approach compared to other synthesis methods like arc discharge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD), especially when considering applications in the biomedical field. The uniqueness of flame synthesis lies in its ability to achieve commercial scalability and produce CNTs with low density and high surface areas, which are advantageous for enhancing adsorption properties crucial for biomedical applications. This method, by employing different catalyst materials and controlling conditions such as fuel equivalence ratio and residence time, allows for the tailored growth of CNTs, which is essential for specific biomedical uses. In contrast, traditional methods like arc discharge and laser ablation, although capable of producing high-purity CNTs, suffer from limitations such as short tube lengths, high costs, and the requirement for expensive equipment. These methods also tend to produce CNTs with defects, which can be detrimental to their functionality in biomedical applications. Chemical vapor deposition, on the other hand, offers better control over the synthesis process and can produce nanotubes with desired features but struggles with scalability and purity, necessitating extensive post-synthesis purification. Flame synthesis also stands out for its potential in functionalizing CNTs for biomedical applications. The method has been shown to coat CNTs onto substrates like S-glass fiber, significantly enhancing thermal and electrical conductivities. This capability is crucial for developing multi-scale composite materials for biomedical devices, where improved conductivity can enhance device performance. Moreover, the flame synthesis method aligns with the green chemistry principles by being energy-saving and allowing for easy scale-up, which is vital for the sustainable production of nanomaterials for biomedical applications. This contrasts with the energy-intensive nature of arc discharge and the high costs associated with laser ablation. In summary, flame synthesis offers a scalable, cost-effective, and versatile method for producing CNTs tailored for biomedical applications, overcoming several limitations of traditional synthesis methods.How multi-regime combustion simulation challenges the RANS EDCstandard solver?

Multi-regime combustion simulation poses challenges to the RANS EDC standard solver due to the intricate interactions between turbulent eddies and chemical reactions, demanding accurate prediction of burn rates across various turbulence-flame regimes. The complexity arises from the need to incorporate turbulent flame speed (sT) accurately under different combustion conditions, which is further complicated by the lack of coherent sT measurements in literature. Additionally, the coupling of radiation with turbulent combustion introduces fundamental and practical questions, as radiation and combustion involve distinct physics and timescales. To address these challenges, methodologies like tabulated chemistry and virtual chemical schemes are employed to predict flame structures and pollutant formation in multi-regime turbulent combustion scenarios.How does the introduction of CO2 as a diluent affect the temperature distribution in oxy-moderated combustion?

The introduction of CO2 as a diluent in oxy-moderated combustion significantly impacts temperature distribution. Studies show that in oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) scenarios with CO2 dilution, the presence of CO2 leads to lower average temperatures in the combustion furnace, better temperature uniformity, and higher CO emissions. Additionally, CO2 dilution affects thermal and chemical performance, influencing factors such as temperature distribution, propane pyrolysis, and CO formation mechanisms. Furthermore, in swirl-stabilized diffusion flames, CO2 addition to fuel and oxidizer streams results in reduced flame temperatures and lengths, along with changes in flame strength and CO concentration. Overall, the incorporation of CO2 as a diluent plays a crucial role in altering temperature profiles and combustion characteristics in oxy-moderated combustion systems.How does the further addition of CO2 affect the temperature difference between peak and exhaust temperatures?

The further addition of CO2 has a notable impact on the temperature difference between peak and exhaust temperatures. Studies have shown that increasing CO2 in the inlet charge leads to a reduction in maximum flame temperatures, indicating a decrease in peak temperatures. This reduction in peak temperatures is attributed to the dilution effect caused by CO2 displacing oxygen in the inlet air. Additionally, the chemical effects of CO2 addition contribute to lowering the peak flame temperatures in various flames, such as ethylene, ethanol, and dimethyl-ether flames. Overall, the addition of CO2 plays a significant role in reducing the temperature difference between peak and exhaust temperatures by influencing the combustion process and thermal characteristics of the flames.Why progress variable is usend in methane air combustion?

The progress variable is utilized in methane-air combustion to accurately model the combustion process and predict flame behavior. By defining a well-optimized progress variable, the combustion models can account for the complex interactions of various chemical species involved in the reaction. This progress variable is crucial for flamelet-based combustion models as it helps in determining the flame structure, reaction rates, and flame speed accurately. The optimization of progress variables through methods like genetic algorithms and principal component analysis enhances the accuracy of predictions, especially in high-temperature regions. Additionally, the inclusion of critical chemical species in the progress variable definition, such as CH3O2, CH3CHO, and HO2, significantly impacts the precision of ethanol-air flame predictions.