Is the response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave generally lower or higher?
Best insight from top research papers
The response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally higher. The analysis of various floating structures, including those with Oscillating Water Column (OWC) devices and moored flexible platforms, indicates that the hydroelastic response and structural deflection due to wave interaction are significant, leading to increased transmission coefficients and loads on the structure over its lifetime . Additionally, in the context of a floating bridge structure, the stochastic dynamic analysis highlights the influence of wave-induced response, emphasizing the need to consider wave load processes and structural idealization to assess stress and dynamic amplification accurately . The low-frequency dynamic response of floating structures, such as bridges and tunnels, further underscores the potential for high dynamic amplification due to inherent damping levels, necessitating detailed evaluation methods .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally higher due to low inherent damping levels for low-frequency response, leading to high dynamic amplification effects. | |
01 Jan 2016 3 Citations | The response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally higher due to the influence on von Mises stress from low and high frequency waves. |
| The response of the floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally higher due to the complex interactions with wave energy converters and wind turbine components. | |
| The response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally lower based on the Timoshenko-Mindlin beam theory and small amplitude wave theory assumptions. | |
8 Citations | The response of a floating structure considering the diffracted wave is generally lower due to wave attenuation analyzed in the presence of vertical porous barriers. |
Related Questions
What is the meaning if in a set of responses the standard deviation value is less than 3.0?5 answersWhen the standard deviation value in a set of responses is less than 3.0, it indicates a low level of variability among the predicted optimal solutions. This implies that the decision-maker can have higher confidence in the accuracy and reproducibility of the Pareto solutions selected, as the differences between the predicted responses are relatively small. Additionally, in the context of trajectory-based knowledge graphs in intelligent transportation systems, a deep contrast set approach enables highly accurate detection of outliers in trajectories and deviation locations, showcasing the importance of precise measurements and calibration. This suggests that a standard deviation below 3.0 signifies a more consistent and reliable set of data or solutions in various applications, enhancing decision-making processes and analytical outcomes.
What cause the diffraction peak different?5 answersThe differences in diffraction peak shapes can be attributed to various factors. For instance, in thin crystal samples, constructive interference from specific layers near the sample surfaces can lead to distinct peaks, causing peak shape aberrations. Additionally, in neutron strain scanning, peak shifts and apparent strains can arise due to variations in neutron beam intensity within the gauge volume, influenced by beam attenuation and sample geometry. Moreover, asymmetry in diffraction peaks of nanocrystalline metals can be linked to lattice constant dependence on crystal size, affecting the column length distribution. Furthermore, electric field-induced diffraction peaks in materials like LiNbO3 with interdigital electrodes can result from field-induced refractive index changes, leading to period-doubled diffraction gratings.
What has done to the problem of earthquakes towards structures?5 answersThe problem of earthquakes towards structures has been addressed through various approaches. One approach is the development of seismic protection strategies, including seismic isolation, passive energy dissipation, semiactive and active, and hybrid systems. These strategies aim to design and build structures that can resist earthquake-generated agitations and minimize damage and loss of life and property. Another approach is the use of composite materials and innovative solutions for strengthening and retrofitting existing structures. These solutions, which have been applied in the Mediterranean area, offer low impact and cost-effective interventions to increase the capacity of structures and reduce damage during seismic actions. Additionally, there has been a focus on improving seismic design provisions and retrofitting techniques to enhance the earthquake resistance of reinforced concrete structures. Studies have shown that improved seismic design and retrofitting can significantly improve building performance during earthquakes. Furthermore, novel devices, such as the hydro-pneumatic semi-active resettable device (HSRD), have been proposed for vibration suppression of building structures subjected to near-field earthquakes. These devices, combined with semi-active control strategies, have shown promising results in mitigating vibrations and reducing damage during near-field earthquakes.
Is there more dispersion at higher wavelengths?5 answersYes, there is evidence of dispersion at higher wavelengths. Measurements of the dielectric properties of methyl and ethyl alcohols at different wavelengths provide evidence of a second dispersion region at radio frequencies in addition to the main one associated with dipole-rotation phenomena. Additionally, a method for rotationally broadening high-dispersion spectra of rotating bodies such as stars and planets is presented, indicating that rotation can contribute significantly to line broadening. Furthermore, measurements of mode and material dispersion in a multimode fiber show that uniform illumination of the input cone of acceptance causes a pulse to broaden, suggesting dispersion at different wavelengths.
How non-piezoelectric effects effect piezoresponse?5 answersNon-piezoelectric effects can have an impact on piezoresponse. One major non-piezoelectric effect is the electrostatic effect, which can contribute to the electromechanical response measured in piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM). Another non-piezoelectric effect is the electrochemical strain, which can also affect the measured PFM response. Additionally, converse flexoelectricity, a mechanical stress induced by an electric polarization gradient, can lead to large effective piezoelectric coefficients even in non-piezoelectric dielectrics. These non-piezoelectric effects can complicate the interpretation of PFM measurements and require careful consideration to differentiate the ferroelectric contribution from other contributions. Understanding and accounting for these non-piezoelectric effects is crucial for accurately assessing and interpreting piezoresponse in various materials and systems.
What result take from response spectram analysis?5 answersResponse spectrum analysis provides valuable information about the behavior of structures under dynamic loads. It is used to determine the modal response spectrum (MRS) of a structure, which represents the maximum response at each natural frequency. This analysis method is often compared to the equivalent lateral force (ELF) analysis, and in most cases, it is performed using commercial finite element analysis software. The statistical probability of the response spectra is also analyzed, considering factors such as elastic and inelastic spectra, empirical probability distributions, and characteristic of the response spectra. Response spectra analysis is applied to obtain transient structural responses, such as strains and stresses, during impact acceleration pulse tests. Additionally, response spectrum analysis simplifies the complexity associated with traditional modal superposition simulations, providing accurate representations of forces and displacements in structures.