Is there any possibility to achieve fragility analysis for structural member?
Best insight from top research papers
Fragility analysis for structural members is possible using probabilistic methods. These methods consider the uncertainties in input parameters and aim to develop fragility curves for fire-exposed structural elements . Seismic fragility analysis, which characterizes the probability of exceeding a certain level of damage in a structure, can also be performed for structural members . The seismic performance and robustness of timber-framed structures can be assessed using a probabilistic methodology that incorporates uncertainties in mechanical properties and external loads . A probabilistic framework has been developed to investigate the vulnerability of reinforced concrete (RC) members and structures under fire loading scenarios, allowing for the development of fragility curves . Additionally, logarithm piecewise functions and the univariate conditioning approximation method have been proposed to generate fragility curves for steel arch truss bridges, providing a more efficient alternative to traditional methods .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
33 Citations | Yes, the paper discusses the use of the probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM) to compute component fragility, which allows for fragility analysis of structural members. |
9 Citations | Yes, the paper discusses the development of fragility curves for structural members under fire loading scenarios. |
12 May 2021 2 Citations | The paper proposes a probabilistic methodology for seismic and robustness assessment of timber-framed structures, which includes the development of seismic fragility curves for different damage levels. However, it does not specifically mention fragility analysis for structural members. |
01 Jan 2022 | The paper discusses fragility analysis for seismic structural performances, but it does not specifically mention fragility analysis for individual structural members. |
| Yes, the paper explores the application of regression techniques to develop fragility curves for fire-exposed structural members. |
Related Questions
What is a fragility fracture?4 answersA fragility fracture is a type of stress fracture resulting from physiological stress on weakened bones. These fractures are not common but are significant due to the pain, reduced quality of life, and economic burden they impose on society. They are often challenging to diagnose, as standard X-rays may show signs of fracture repair rather than the actual fracture. Fragility fractures are prevalent among the elderly, with lower extremity fractures being more common than upper extremity fractures, often occurring due to falls at home or in public settings. Understanding the primary causes and anatomical locations of fragility fractures is crucial for effective prevention and management strategies to reduce the risk of these fractures in older adults.
What factors contribute to the seismic fragility of low-rise and mid-rise buildings?5 answersThe seismic fragility of low-rise and mid-rise buildings is influenced by various factors. For low-rise piloti buildings, irregularities in both vertical and horizontal systems, such as soft stories and poor reinforcement detailing, contribute to their seismic vulnerability. Unreinforced masonry walls in low-rise buildings are susceptible to high-velocity pulses in near-field seismic events, affecting their fragility. In Nepal, the seismic fragility of low-rise reinforced concrete frames is significantly reduced when considering the effect of infill walls, which enhance structural stiffness and reduce displacements during earthquakes. Mid-rise flat slab RCC structures face challenges like high flexibility and poor seismic performance, leading to the development of fragility curves to quantify seismic vulnerability. Retrofitting strategies using Fiber Reinforced Plastic, Buckling Restrained Braced Frames, and shear walls can improve the seismic fragility of existing low-to-mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings.
Is nonstructural cracks can affect the structural integrity of a structure?5 answersNonstructural cracks, originating from factors like moisture, thermal fluctuations, or foundation issues, generally do not directly weaken a structure's integrity. However, they can still impact the building's performance, durability, and aesthetics by causing leaks, reducing stiffness, and affecting overall functionality. Structural cracks, on the other hand, pose a more serious threat as they stem from design flaws, construction errors, or overloading, potentially endangering the safety of the structure. It is crucial to identify and address all types of cracks promptly to prevent further damage and ensure the long-term stability of the building. Therefore, while nonstructural cracks may not directly compromise structural integrity, they can still lead to significant issues that need to be mitigated to maintain the overall health of the structure.
Write scholarly article on Aviation Accidents due to structural failure ?5 answersAviation accidents due to structural failure pose significant risks, with trends showing an increase in fatigue-related incidents over the years. Understanding common failure modes, such as corrosion-induced failures, is crucial in preventing catastrophic consequences. Historical investigations have highlighted seven serious threats to structural safety, emphasizing the evolution of structural requirements to mitigate these risks. Reliability assessments play a key role in ensuring aircraft safety, with a focus on estimating the percentage of functioning units over time. Methodologies integrating structural tests and failure stress distributions aid in predicting and managing structural failures, contributing to safer aircraft designs. By addressing these factors, the aviation industry can enhance safety measures and reduce the occurrence of accidents stemming from structural failures.
What is structural cracks?4 answersStructural cracks are fractures in a building that can affect its stability and pose a risk to its structural integrity. These cracks can be caused by various factors such as construction errors, inescapable factors, and overloads. They can vary in depth, width, direction, pattern, location, and cause. Structural cracks can be active, meaning they widen, deepen, or migrate through the concrete, or dormant, remaining unchanged. Active structural cracks can result from continued overloads, uneven foundation settling, or design inadequacies, while dormant cracks may be caused by shrinkage during the curing process. It is important to identify and treat structural cracks early to prevent further damage and ensure the safety of the building.
What are the main causes of structural cracks?5 answersThe main causes of structural cracks in concrete buildings are faulty design, faulty construction, overloading, and induced stresses. Temporary or continued overloads, uneven foundation settling, and original design inadequacies can also lead to structural cracks. Additionally, thermally-induced cracks can occur due to temperature changes, especially in older concrete structures without expansion joints. Inadequate repairs and lack of professional consultation can aggravate the problem. In buildings that have not undergone proper repairs, various deformations such as yield, subsidence, deflections, bends, twists, distortions, and horizontal displacements can contribute to the appearance of cracks. According to professionals in the Nigerian building industry, foundation settlement, poor selection of construction materials and technique, design errors, and corrosion of steel bars are major causes of cracks in built structures.