Political interference and manipulation in decision making?
Best insight from top research papers
Political interference and manipulation in decision-making are prevalent issues across various sectors. The lack of clear definitions of political interference in scientific decisions has hindered reporting and addressing such incidents within US health agencies . Manipulation, often seen as a form of power distinct from persuasion and coercion, can undermine autonomy and pose challenges in democratic systems . The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has highlighted the ethical dilemmas faced by physicians due to political interpretations of laws, leading to potential fines and imprisonment . Addressing these issues requires systematic approaches that define and report political interference while considering the impact on individuals' decision-making processes and autonomy.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Manipulation in decision-making involves intentional disruptions by political actors to influence individuals' behaviors and beliefs, potentially leading to dominating interventions through non-contingent misrepresentations. | |
| Manipulation in politics involves influencing individuals to act against their initial inclinations, posing autonomy and consent challenges, especially in democracies, impacting decision-making processes. | |
| US health agencies lack clear procedures to address political interference in scientific decision-making, as highlighted in the GAO report, indicating a need for better processes. | |
| Political interference in decisions, like the recent Roe v. Wade overturning, can lead to ethical dilemmas for physicians, forcing them to choose between compliance, leaving, or deception to uphold their ethics. | |
| US health agencies lack procedures to address political interference in scientific decisions, hindering reporting of such incidents due to fear of retaliation or uncertainty about reporting mechanisms. |
Related Questions
What is political manipulation?5 answersPolitical manipulation refers to the intentional use of various strategies and tactics to influence individuals or groups towards specific political goals. It involves the utilization of language, information, and media to shape perceptions, control decisions, and gain power within political discourse. Different theoretical perspectives highlight manipulation as a means of covert influence, often undermining autonomy and consent, especially in democratic settings. The practice of manipulation can involve deceptive or dominating interventions that affect individuals' cognitive capabilities and decision-making processes. While some views on manipulation are negative, others suggest that it can be constructive if aligned with the interests of the manipulated entity. The close relationship between political manipulation and the media underscores the evolving nature of this phenomenon in contemporary political landscapes.
Does the presence of visual interference affect decision-making processes?5 answersThe presence of visual interference does affect decision-making processes. Research has shown that visual interference can disrupt the activation of visual knowledge, leading to impaired performance in tasks that require visual judgments. In addition, studies have found that the interference effect produced by recognizing colors in the Stroop-task can result in wrong decision-making. Furthermore, the use of information visualization has been found to improve decision quality and speed, although its effects on other variables such as decision confidence are more mixed. These findings suggest that visual interference can have a significant impact on decision-making processes, influencing both cognitive processes and the ability to make accurate decisions.
What is electoral interference?5 answersElectoral interference refers to intentional attempts by state or non-state actors to influence electoral processes or public perceptions in order to benefit or disadvantage election contestants in another country. This interference can be covert or overt and is often carried out by foreign powers or organizations. It has been a historical phenomenon, with examples ranging from French interference in the US presidential elections in 1796to Russia's interference in the 2016 and 2018 US elections. Such interference violates the membership rules for political decision-making and undermines the idea of self-determination. It is considered an existential threat to societies and can take various forms, including propaganda, misinformation, and strategic interactions between economic and political agents. Efforts to combat electoral interference include ensuring transparency in the deliberative process and exposing covert interference in real time.
What are examples of political interference in CBC?3 answersPolitical interference in the CBC has been evident through control exerted by political appointments, financial restraints, directives on programming, and incessant investigations.
Does political interference influence reapplication intentions of applicants to the United States?5 answersPolitical interference does not appear to be directly addressed in the abstracts provided. However, one study examined the reapplication intentions of applicants to the United States federal government position and found that perceived performance and procedural justice rules influenced reapplication behavior. Another study explored COVID-19 vaccine intentions and found that political conservatism was associated with lower intentions to be vaccinated. While these studies do not directly address political interference, they suggest that individual beliefs and perceptions can influence reapplication intentions and vaccine intentions. Further research would be needed to specifically examine the influence of political interference on reapplication intentions of applicants to the United States.
Does political interference influence reapplication?3 answersPolitical interference can have an influence on reapplication. The paper by Keating and Schmitt argues that the ideological influence of the Russian regime in the USA can help explain the high level of contestation over Russian political interference. They suggest that the appeal of the Russian regime's conservative and populist ideology contributes to the division in responding to this threat. This implies that political interference can shape the political landscape and affect the decision-making process, potentially impacting reapplication. Additionally, the paper by Dowla discusses how political interference in microfinance can result in a political backlash, causing damage to the microfinance sector. This suggests that political interference can have negative consequences for certain sectors, which could indirectly influence reapplication.