Search or ask a question

What are some examples of Likert scales that have been used to measure student participation?

Reliability (semiconductor)

Construct validity

Best insight from top research papers

Likert scales have been commonly used to measure student participation in educational research. For example, Kuswanto et al. developed a questionnaire consisting of 19 items measured using a five-point Likert scale to assess student engagement in online learning . Similarly, Turan et al. discussed the use of Likert scales and Likert-type items in educational research and the analysis of data obtained from these scales . Likert scales have also been used to measure student perceptions and attitudes towards educational interventions. Sullivan and Artino highlighted the use of Likert scales in assessing performance after an educational intervention in medical education research . Tastle et al. introduced a new measure called the Consensus Measure, which can be used in conjunction with a weighted mean to compare and contrast multiple Likert data, including student perceptions . Overall, Likert scales have proven to be a valuable tool in measuring student participation and attitudes in various educational contexts.

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Likert scales: how to (ab)use them Susan Jamieson 01 Dec 2004-Medical Education 2.2K Citations	The paper does not provide specific examples of Likert scales used to measure student participation.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Developing Students' Engagement in Online Learning Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model Heru Kuswanto, Elisabeth Pratidhina, Dadan Rosana - Show less +2 more 28 Sep 2022-KnE Social Sciences	The paper does not provide examples of Likert scales used to measure student participation.
Open access•Proceedings Article A new measure to analyze student performance using the likert scale William J. Tastle, Jack Russell, Mark J. Wierman - Show less +2 more 01 Dec 2005 32 Citations	The paper does not provide specific examples of Likert scales used to measure student participation. The paper focuses on the development of a new measure called the Consensus Measure and its application in analyzing student data.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales Gail M. Sullivan, Anthony R. Artino - Show less +1 more 01 Dec 2013-Journal of Graduate Medical Education 1.5K Citations	The paper does not provide specific examples of Likert scales used to measure student participation.

My columns

Related Questions

What is the likert scale?5 answersThe Likert scale is a widely used instrument in survey research for measuring public opinion on political and economic issues. Respondents express their agreement or disagreement by placing their attitudes on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Likert scales consist of a series of statements related to the attitude being measured, with subjects indicating their feelings on a bipolar scale. Responses are scored and summed to create a composite value reflecting the respondents' attitudes. Despite its popularity, the Likert scale has faced debates regarding the number of items needed, response categories, and data analysis methods. While the scale is typically considered ordinal, there are cases where treating the data as interval is not only permissible but necessary.

What are the advantages and limitations of using the Likert scale in educational research?5 answersThe Likert scale is commonly used in educational research due to its advantages in measuring attitudes and opinions. It provides a structured and standardized format for data collection, allowing for easy comparison and analysis of responses. Researchers often use Likert scales with odd response choices, such as 5 or 7 points, as they have been found to be more effective in terms of reliability and validity coefficients. However, the Likert scale also has limitations. Response bias and central tendency bias can affect the validity and reliability of the instrument. Additionally, the number of points on the scale, the composite score, and the midpoint need to be carefully considered to ensure accurate data interpretation and appropriate statistical analysis. It is important to calibrate the statement sentences or item questions to accurately measure the intended construct. Overall, while the Likert scale is a valuable tool in educational research, researchers should be aware of its limitations and take steps to mitigate potential biases and ensure accurate measurement.

What is Likert Scale?5 answersA Likert scale is a measurement tool commonly used in social sciences research to assess attitudes or opinions. It involves a series of statements or items that respondents rate on a scale, typically ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The scale is used to measure the intensity or strength of characteristics or traits, such as attitudes, on a linear continuum. The data obtained from Likert scales can be analyzed using statistical methods, both parametric and non-parametric, depending on the research purpose. Likert scales are often used in surveys or questionnaires to collect data in various domains, including disaster risk reduction, business continuity management, and organizational resilience. They can be used to evaluate various characteristics and are viewed as an ordered finite set of pre-defined categories. It is important to consider certain requirements, such as the composite score, midpoint, and number of points, to ensure accurate data analysis.

What is a Likert scale?3 answersA Likert scale is a measurement tool used in social sciences research to assess attitudes or opinions. It consists of a series of statements or items that respondents rate on a scale, typically ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The scale is designed to capture the intensity or strength of the respondent's agreement or disagreement with each statement. The data obtained from Likert scales can be analyzed using statistical methods, both parametric and non-parametric, depending on the research purpose. Likert scales can be used to measure various characteristics in social sciences, economics, and other areas of science. However, there are debates and controversies surrounding the use of Likert scales, including issues related to data quality, ranking order and distance between scale options, combining scale options, and quantification of negation choices. To address these debates, researchers have proposed techniques such as Z-Score Transformation Scaling and the use of Z-numbers in conjunction with the Likert scale.

Likert scales used to measure student participation?5 answersLikert scales are commonly used to measure student engagement and perceptions in online learning. Likert scales are also used to measure student views on educational interventions and attitudes. However, Likert scales have limitations, such as being ordinal measures and lacking the ability to compare and contrast multiple Likert data. To address these limitations, alternative measures have been proposed, such as the Consensus Measure, which can be used in conjunction with a weighted mean to assess the dispersion of values around a mean. Another alternative is the use of Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) in student evaluations of teaching, which provide unequivocal behavioral examples and eliminate ambiguity in the interpretation of results. The change of response order in a Likert-type scale does not substantially influence participant responses and scale characteristics.

Why using Likert scale is good?5 answersUsing Likert scales is beneficial because they provide a method for measuring attitudes and characteristics on a linear continuum from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Likert scales are commonly used in various domains, such as disaster risk reduction, business continuity management, and organizational resilience, for benchmarking responses in questionnaires. They are flexible and intuitive tools that can be applied in social sciences, economics, and other areas of science for evaluating various characteristics. Likert scales also allow for the collection of data that can be analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques, both parametric and non-parametric, depending on the research purpose. Additionally, Likert scales can be adapted for use with nonhuman animals, providing a means for them to communicate their preferences in a more nuanced way.

See what other people are reading

How does the level of customer satisfaction vary among different fast food establishments?

Customer satisfaction levels vary among different fast-food establishments based on various factors. Research indicates that in Perlis, Malaysia, the quality of service is the most crucial factor influencing customer satisfaction, followed by food quality, price, and restaurant atmosphere. In Da Nang, Vietnam, service quality, price, and physical environment positively impact customer satisfaction, while food quality does not significantly influence it. Additionally, the study in Jabodetabek highlights that service quality significantly affects customer satisfaction, leading to repeat visits, while product quality alone does not directly impact satisfaction. Overall, factors such as service quality, price, and restaurant atmosphere play significant roles in determining customer satisfaction levels across different fast-food establishments.Why is face validity of the research instrument is established?

Face validity of a research instrument is established to ensure that the instrument appears relevant, clear, and understandable to the intended audience, which in turn enhances the quality of data collected and the overall experience of the test-takers. Establishing face validity is crucial as it helps in identifying incomprehensible items, reducing confusion, and preventing frustration among participants. By assessing face validity, researchers can confirm that the items in the instrument are relevant, easy to answer, and not distressing or judgmental, ultimately leading to better-quality data collection and increased participant satisfaction. Additionally, face validity is essential for ensuring that the instrument accurately measures what it intends to measure, contributing to the overall validity and reliability of the research findings.How does CRISP-DM approach the process of data mining and predictive modeling?

CRISP-DM (Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining) is a structured methodology for conducting data mining projects. It involves several key phases: Business Understanding, Data Understanding, Data Preparation, Modeling, Evaluation, and Deployment. The approach aims to guide practitioners through the entire data mining process, from understanding the business objectives to deploying predictive models effectively. Various industries, such as industrial machinery, oil and gas, finance, and data analysis projects, have utilized CRISP-DM to enhance their processes. By following CRISP-DM, organizations can improve the reliability of real-time data, identify drilling troubles in advance, predict stock prices accurately, and address gaps in standardized data mining processes. The methodology fosters collaboration between domain experts and data scientists, leading to successful outcomes and significant time and cost savings.Can the concept of “disconnectivity” assist thinking about the spatial configurations of the contemporary world?

The concept of "disconnectivity" can indeed aid in understanding the spatial arrangements of the modern world. While connectivity studies have gained prominence, the notion of disconnectivity has been relatively overlooked. Studies on sediment dynamics in landscapes like the Tahoma Creek watershed highlight how disconnectivity plays a crucial role in shaping spatial patterns and sediment transfers. Recognizing disconnectivity in geomorphic systems reveals the intermittent nature of processes and challenges the assumption of continuous mass and energy flow. Understanding sources of disconnectivity can provide concrete evidence of how landscapes operate over various timescales, emphasizing the prevalence of disconnectivity in shaping landscapes. By mapping sources of disconnectivity, a clearer picture of system disconnectivity emerges, enhancing our comprehension of spatial configurations in the contemporary world.What's the relationship between social thinking and prejudice?

Social thinking and prejudice are intricately linked, as evidenced by various research studies. Studies have shown that social dominance orientation (SDO) is directly associated with materialist values and inversely associated with post-materialistic values, indicating a relationship between social dominance and certain psychosocial values. Furthermore, the intention to engage in social conflict behavior is influenced by stereotypes, social identity, and prejudice, with a significant positive relationship found between these factors and the intention of social conflict. Additionally, research has highlighted how moral prejudices, stemming from self-interest, can impact social preferences and lead to a shift from altruistic to selfish orientations in resource allocation decision-making processes. These findings collectively emphasize the complex interplay between social thinking, values, stereotypes, and prejudices in shaping attitudes and behaviors within society.What are the implications of food commoditization for small-scale farmers and local food systems?

Food commoditization has significant implications for small-scale farmers and local food systems. The process of commodification, where essential goods like food are standardized and traded at market prices, can reduce access to land for small farmers, impacting their food security. However, market-oriented cooperation (MOC) can enhance technical efficiency in small-scale farms, benefiting food production performance. Initiatives like the Brazilian PRONAF program aim to support family farming amidst increasing commoditization, showing that commoditization doesn't necessarily threaten food security for family farmers but can negatively affect society at large. The consolidation of markets globally by a small minority of actors can leave farmers and communities out of key decisions, creating an agroecological crisis rooted in social and economic organization.What was the cost of Flood events globally?

Flood events globally have incurred substantial costs over the years. From 1980 to 2013, global flood losses exceeded $1 trillion, with approximately 220,000 fatalities. In 2016, large-scale flood events in various regions caused economic losses of nearly US$30 billion, indicating the significant financial impact of floods. Moreover, flood losses account for over 40% of the total natural disaster losses from 1900 to 2015, amounting to over $7 trillion (2015-adjusted) globally. These figures highlight the immense economic burden posed by floods, emphasizing the urgent need for effective disaster management strategies to mitigate the escalating costs associated with flooding events.What are the implication toward small scale sugarcane farmers?

The implications for small-scale sugarcane farmers are multifaceted. Climate change poses a significant threat to sugarcane productivity, influencing farmers' adaptation practices. Commercial sugarcane cultivation can lead to food insecurity among smallholder farmers, as it prioritizes quick commercial gains over sustained food production, impacting household food security. Adoption of machinery services by small-scale sugarcane farmers can affect their livelihoods positively, reducing drudgery, increasing yield and profit, and addressing concerns over dry spells and droughts. Factors such as age of the farmer, farm size, fertilizer quantity, credit provision, irrigation methods, and land ownership significantly affect the yield of small-scale sugarcane farmers, highlighting the importance of access to production inputs and credit for enhancing output. These findings underscore the need for targeted support systems and inclusive strategies to assist small-scale sugarcane farmers in adapting to challenges and improving their livelihoods.What is text cleaning in text mining?

Text cleaning in text mining refers to the process of preparing textual data for analysis by removing noise, inconsistencies, and irrelevant information. It involves techniques like preprocessing, numeralization, and semantic recognition to enhance the quality of the data. Natural Language Processing (NLP) plays a crucial role in text cleaning, enabling efficient and effective data cleaning mechanisms. The goal is to ensure the reliability of data, especially in domains like healthcare, where diverse datasets are evaluated to support a generalized data cleaning concept. Text cleaning is essential for converting unstructured text documents into structured data, facilitating accurate results in text mining applications.What would be the implication toward small scale sugarcane farmers?

The implications for small-scale sugarcane farmers are multifaceted. Commercial sugarcane cultivation, driven by quick gains rather than sustained food production, leads to food insecurity among households, as observed in Uganda's Bunyoro and Busoga sub-regions. Climate change further exacerbates challenges for small-scale sugarcane farmers, affecting their adaptive capacity and productivity in countries like Indonesia. In Thailand, the adoption of machinery services by small-scale sugarcane farmers impacts their livelihoods, with costs of services comprising a significant portion of production costs and varying quality of services affecting farmers' yields and profits. Additionally, in Mpumalanga, South Africa, small-scale sugarcane growers face declining incomes due to limited land areas, communal property rights, and challenges in group schemes, threatening their sustainability and necessitating institutional changes for improved governance and grower support.Can mindfulness be measured by qualitatively and quantitatively?

Mindfulness can indeed be measured both qualitatively and quantitatively. Various research papers have developed scales and measures to assess different aspects of mindfulness. For instance, the development of observer-report questionnaires like the Observed Mindfulness Measure (OMM) allows for the qualitative assessment of mindfulness behaviors noticeable to others. On the other hand, scales like the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) provide a quantitative assessment by evaluating the quantity and quality of formal and informal mindfulness practice. Additionally, the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) quantifies the level of applying mindfulness skills during and after interventions, showcasing the behavioral aspects associated with therapeutic change. These diverse measures collectively contribute to a comprehensive evaluation of mindfulness through both qualitative and quantitative lenses.