scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What causes high phosphorus in faecal sludge? 


Best insight from top research papers

High phosphorus content in faecal sludge can be caused by several factors. One factor is the presence of phosphorus-rich compounds in the sludge, such as iron phosphates and orthophosphates, which can be recovered through various treatment processes . Another factor is the use of phosphate-precipitating chemicals during sewage treatment, which can lead to high phosphorus concentrations in the sludge . Additionally, the combustion and gasification of char from sewage sludge can result in the formation of ash with high phosphorus content, which can be further extracted for phosphorus recovery . Overall, the high phosphorus content in faecal sludge is a result of both natural phosphorus compounds and the use of chemicals during sewage treatment processes.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The provided paper does not mention the specific causes of high phosphorus in faecal sludge. The paper focuses on the recovery of phosphorus from sewage sludge char ash through combustion and gasification processes.
The provided paper does not discuss the causes of high phosphorus in faecal sludge. The paper focuses on the recovery and reuse of phosphorus from municipal sewage sludge incineration fly ash.
Open accessJournal ArticleDOI
28 Jun 2023-Water
The provided paper does not specifically mention the causes of high phosphorus in faecal sludge. The paper focuses on the recovery of phosphorus from sewage sludge through a wet oxidation process and subsequent chemical precipitation as struvite.
The provided paper does not specifically mention the causes of high phosphorus in faecal sludge.
The provided paper does not mention the specific causes of high phosphorus in faecal sludge. The paper focuses on the extraction and precipitation of phosphorus from sewage sludge.

Related Questions

What happens when fertilizer dont have much phosphorus content?5 answersWhen fertilizers lack phosphorus content, the soil's phosphorus concentration may remain low, potentially below the crop's needs. Reduced or low phosphorus fertilizer compositions may contain polyamino acid salts along with nitrogen and potassium sources, offering an alternative for plant nutrition. In intensively managed soils with excess phosphorus concentrations, decreasing phosphorus fertilizer applications can lead to a decline in extractable phosphorus levels over time, particularly in grazed pasture soils. A long-term field trial revealed that inorganic phosphorus fractions can decrease without phosphorus application, while certain fractions with low bioavailability may increase under different fertilization modes. Additionally, fertilizers incorporating organic constituents from sludge products with reduced phosphorus percentages can provide a sustainable nutrient source for plants.
What is a faecal sludge treatment plant?5 answersA Faecal Sludge Treatment Plant (FSTP) is a facility designed to manage and treat faecal sludge collected from onsite containment systems like septic tanks and pit latrines. These plants play a crucial role in processing faecal sludge to ensure safe disposal and prevent environmental pollution. Treatment processes at FSTPs typically involve solid-liquid separation, dewatering, disinfection, and pollutant removal. Various technologies are employed in FSTPs, such as using natural coagulants, activated carbon, and herbal disinfectants for effective treatment. The end products of faecal sludge treatment include solid portions used as manure and energy sources, while liquid portions find applications in gardening and cleaning activities. FSTPs are essential for maintaining public health and environmental sustainability by managing faecal waste effectively.
Nutrient recovery system from sludge?4 answersNutrient recovery systems from sludge involve the use of advanced treatment technologies to manage biosolids waste and maximize the recovery of phosphorus. One approach is the wet oxidation (WO) process, which can achieve high removal values of organic matter and total solids content. Phosphorus can be recovered from the liquid effluent of the WO process through chemical precipitation as struvite, a slow-release fertilizer. Another method involves the use of an anaerobic unit before the pre-dewatering stage to favor the early release of phosphorus and minimize uncontrolled struvite precipitation. Implementing a phosphorus stripping unit can enhance phosphorus recovery and reduce the phosphorus content of biosolids. Struvite precipitation can also be achieved using a fluidized-bed reactor, with high performances even at short hydraulic retention times. The presence of volatile fatty acids does not adversely affect struvite precipitation performance. Co-composting wastewater treatment plant sludge with municipal solid wastes can also be used for nutrient recovery, with optimal ratios of waste to sludge, aeration periods, and porous material content.
What are the current conditions of faecal sludge management?4 answersFaecal sludge management is a significant challenge in informal settlements due to inadequate toilet facilities and high accumulation rates of faecal sludge. However, people in these settlements have developed practices to manage their toilets and containment systems. These practices include periodical containment management, collective emptying mechanisms, and conditional conveyance of faecal sludge. It is important to note that the discharge of faecal sludge into water sources is unsafe. Efforts are being made to improve faecal sludge management in informal settlements by developing environmentally safe practices.In Indonesia, the government has implemented a septic tank desludging program called the Scheduled Faecal Sludge Service (SFSS) system to achieve safely managed sanitation. The SFSS program has received strong support from users, and financial analysis shows a reasonable service rate. Technological aspects, such as technoware, humanware, infoware, and orgaware, have also been assessed. The SFSS program can be further improved by establishing partnerships with the private sector, integrating data management, improving services, and making regulations.In urban areas of India, onsite sanitation facilities are commonly used, but treatment facilities for faecal sludge are lacking. This leads to the disposal of untreated faecal sludge in the environment. Projects like Nirmal aim to demonstrate the feasibility of low-cost decentralized sanitation systems with faecal sludge management. These projects involve the setup of faecal sludge treatment plants and the enhancement of capacity and awareness among stakeholders for sustainable faecal sludge management services.
What is faecal sludge management ?5 answersFaecal sludge management refers to the organized program of collecting, transporting, processing, and utilizing faecal sludge as biological waste. It involves addressing the issues related to the accumulation of faecal sludge in informal settlements, villages, and cities, and the potential impact on water bodies, resources, and human and animal health. The management of faecal sludge includes the identification of low-cost and eco-friendly technologies for treating faecal sludge or septage, with the aim of reducing the spread of diseases and controlling environmental pollution. It also involves the development of institutional roles and responsibilities at national, state, and city levels, as well as planning mechanisms and regulatory frameworks. Understanding the drying properties of faecal sludge is also important for the development of efficient drying techniques and mitigation of health and environmental issues.
How faecal sludge characteristics affect resource recovery?3 answersFaecal sludge characteristics can affect resource recovery in various ways. Drying faecal sludge does not affect its nutrient content and calorific value, but it does modify the chemical form of nitrogen and the thermal properties. A sludge treatment method for resource recovery involves the use of hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and peroxides to extract heavy metals and oxidize odor, as well as aeration and washing to remove volatile organic compounds and heavy metals. The treatment method of incineration reduces toxicity and maintains the fertilizing effect of the sludge, while pelletization increases toxicity, leachability of metals, and decreases the fertilizing effect. Baking dried sludge under reducing conditions can enhance its handling properties, reduce dust generation, and increase particle hardness. Electroplating sludge can be recovered by obtaining copper hydroxide, zinc hydroxide, and nickel hydroxide, which have a wider application range compared to nickel sulfate.

See what other people are reading

How technological environment sectors was affected by covid 19?
5 answers
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the technological environment sectors in various ways. The crisis led to an accelerated digital transformation, highlighting the increased importance of technology in society and the economy. Moreover, the pandemic prompted firms to adapt their management practices by utilizing digitalization and embracing new technologies to respond effectively to the crisis. Additionally, technologies such as robotics, sensor networks, and autonomous vehicles played a crucial role in combating COVID-19 by providing remote safety for healthcare workers, enabling virtual visits, and enhancing reporting efficiency. While the pandemic temporarily reduced pollution levels due to lockdowns and reduced travel, it also strained waste management systems and led to environmental damage through increased usage of face masks and disinfectants, highlighting the need for sustainable environmental strategies in the long term.
How physical environment sectors was affected by covid 19?
4 answers
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted various sectors of the physical environment. Studies have shown that during lockdowns, there were improvements in air quality due to reduced emissions of pollutants like CO, NO2, PM2.5, and VOCs. However, the pandemic also led to challenges in waste management systems, with increased generation of medical waste, improper disposal of masks and sanitizers, and accumulation of toxic contaminants in wastewater. The construction and demolition waste management industry faced disruptions, emphasizing the need for digital technologies, business contingency plans, and diversified supply chains. Hospitals had to adapt their physical environments to cater to COVID-19 patients, facing challenges in isolation practices and room conversions. Overall, the pandemic has brought both positive and negative impacts on various aspects of the physical environment.
What suspended particle size can be removed in activated sludge secondary settling tank?
5 answers
The suspended particle size that can be effectively removed in an activated sludge secondary settling tank varies based on the treatment method and conditions. Various techniques have been studied to enhance settling performance and particle removal efficiency. For instance, the use of surfactant modified natural zeolite (SMZ) as a ballasting agent has shown promising results in promoting sludge settling and simultaneously adsorbing nitrate and phosphate, with 75–150 µm size SMZ being particularly effective. Additionally, the application of vacuuming before sedimentation in municipal wastewater treatment plants has been found to improve sedimentation characteristics, density, coarseness, and integrity of flakes, aiding in the removal of suspended particles. Moreover, the use of microporous ceramic diffusers in dissolved air flotation systems has demonstrated efficient separation of suspended solids, including biological flocs, from liquid, achieving clarified effluent with low suspended solids concentrations.
What are the potential challenges and limitations associated with the use of DPAOs for phosphorus recovery and nitrogen removal?
5 answers
The use of DPAOs (Denitrifying Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms) for phosphorus recovery and nitrogen removal faces challenges and limitations. One challenge is the competition for carbon sources between GAOs (Glycogen Accumulating Organisms) and PAOs (Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms). Additionally, external carbon sources in the anoxic phase can lead to a decrease in phosphorus removal efficiency due to the consumption of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). Furthermore, the stability and performance of the denitrifying phosphorus removal (DPR) process can be influenced by factors such as anaerobic retention time, anoxic retention time, and nitrate recycling ratio. These challenges highlight the complexity of balancing nutrient removal processes and microbial interactions in wastewater treatment systems utilizing DPAOs.
What are the mechanisms by which these organisms adapt to survive in the presence of PTEs in soil?
5 answers
Organisms adapt to survive in the presence of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in soil through various mechanisms. Soil bacteria possess genes encoding phosphotriesterases (PTEs) that aid in converting toxic phosphotriesters into a usable form of phosphate, providing a selective advantage. Additionally, the immobilization of PTEs in soils using organic and inorganic amendments, such as phosphate compounds, manure, and biochar, reduces the bioavailability of PTEs, mitigating their toxicity to soil microorganisms. Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, like rhizobia, fine-tune their regulatory machinery, including reversible phosphorylation and two-component systems, to adapt to different environmental conditions and stressors in the soil, ensuring survival and efficient nitrogen fixation for plant growth. These adaptive mechanisms enable organisms to thrive in PTE-contaminated soil environments.
How do the internal interactions of archea, bacteria, and fungi differ under conditions of soil contamination with PTEs?
5 answers
The internal interactions of archaea, bacteria, and fungi in soil contaminated with Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) exhibit distinct patterns. In contaminated soils, bacteria demonstrate higher community diversity and greater responsiveness to seasonal shifts compared to fungi and archaea. Bioremediation using resistant microorganisms is a cost-effective and eco-friendly method for reducing PTEs mobility in soils, with microbial activity transforming toxic elements into less bioavailable forms. The toxicity of PTEs to soil microorganisms can be mitigated by reducing their bioavailability using various organic and inorganic amendments, impacting microbial activity involved in nutrient transformation and cycling. Additionally, the presence of resistant microorganisms in contaminated soils can influence the comparison of contamination changes in microorganism-rich versus microorganism-poor soils, highlighting the importance of microbial communities in bioremediation processes.
How much digested sewage sludge use for 1 ha farmland?
5 answers
For farmland, the amount of digested sewage sludge used per hectare varies based on the study. Research in Italy applied municipal-industrial wastewater sludge at rates of 5 and 10 Mg DM ha^-1 yr^-1 in a long-term field experiment. In a Nordic climate study, sludge products were tested on barley and wheat, achieving barley dry yields above 3500 kg ha^-1 with soluble N at 83 kg ha^-1. In central Greece, digested sludge was incorporated at rates of 10, 30, and 50 Mg ha^-1 for four years, with the lowest rate being sufficient to improve soil properties and enhance cotton yield. Another study in Romania applied sewage sludge at rates of 20, 40, and 60 t/ha, showing compliance with heavy metal limits and beneficial effects on soil and crop quality.
What is the aerobic granulation in treat wastewater?
5 answers
Aerobic granulation is a process where microbial communities form dense, compact aggregates known as aerobic granules, enabling simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and other pollutants in wastewater treatment systems. This process has been successfully demonstrated in various studies for treating different types of wastewater, including domestic, industrial, and saline wastewaters. The formation of aerobic granules has shown excellent settling ability, high removal efficiencies of organic matter and nutrients, and enhanced stability under challenging conditions like salinity exposure, making them a promising solution for efficient and sustainable wastewater treatment. Additionally, the integration of aerobic granular sludge with advanced technologies like membrane systems and microbial fuel cells has been explored to further enhance the treatment efficiency of wastewater.
Is there greater variability in the characteristics of single-family sewage than is found in large sewage treatment plants?
4 answers
Variability in the characteristics of single-family sewage appears to be significant compared to large sewage treatment plants. Studies on single-family sewage treatment systems show innovative approaches like compact anaerobic reactorsand integrated treatment apparatus, indicating tailored solutions for individual households. Physico-chemical analysis of sewage from different sites reveals notable variations in nutrients and salts based on seasonal changes. In contrast, large-scale sewage treatment plants exhibit more standardized processes and consistent characteristics due to their scale and uniformity in operations. The diversity in single-family sewage systems, ranging from anaerobic reactors to wetland-based treatments, suggests a wider range of characteristics compared to the more homogeneous nature of large treatment plants, highlighting the greater variability in single-family sewage characteristics.
What is the salt and DOC/DOM effect on PFAS fate and behaviour in irrigation water?
10 answers
The fate and behavior of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in irrigation water are significantly influenced by the presence of salts and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) or dissolved organic matter (DOM). Salinity affects the distribution coefficient (Kd) for PFAS, with increased salinity enhancing the sorption of PFAS onto inorganic clay surfaces due to electrostatic interactions, although this effect may not significantly alter the mass transfer of PFAS from water columns in estuarine environments. In contrast, the presence of DOC can variably affect PFAS sorption to soil and colloidal activated carbon (CAC), with humus content potentially increasing adsorption sites for long-chain PFAS while short-chain PFAS may be outcompeted by DOC, leading to faster breakthrough. The interaction between PFAS and DOM in wastewater effluent and leachates shows that DOM properties can influence PFAS complexation with metals, suggesting that soil processes and the nature of organic matter in irrigation water can impact PFAS mobility. Furthermore, the use of saline water for irrigation, as explored in the Tarim Basin, indicates that soil salt dynamics are closely related to soil water dynamics, which could influence PFAS transport and retention in agricultural settings. High-resolution characterization of PFAS distribution in AFFF-related source areas and downgradient plumes has shown that salting out effects due to elevated groundwater salinity can influence PFAS plume migration in coastal areas. Moreover, microbial weathering in biosolids demonstrates that organic matter, proteins, lipids, and the molecular weight of organics significantly impact PFAS partitioning, suggesting that microbial processes in soils could also affect PFAS fate in land-applied biosolids and potentially in irrigation water. Lastly, irrigation with saline water has been shown to lead to salt accumulation in soil, which could affect water movement and PFAS behavior, although the specific impact on PFAS fate was not directly studied in this context. Collectively, these findings underscore the complex interactions between salts, DOC/DOM, and PFAS in irrigation water, highlighting the need for a nuanced understanding of these factors to predict and manage PFAS fate and behavior in agricultural settings.
What are the hurdles to utilize sludge from fish farming?
5 answers
The hurdles to utilizing sludge from fish farming include challenges related to sourcing quality sludge worms for fish hatcheries, the need for effective waste management solutions in aquaculture facilities, and the requirement for low-energy and low-cost options to reduce environmental impacts, such as vermifiltration. Additionally, ensuring the quality and safety of sludge for land application as organic fertilizer involves meeting sanitary requirements, detecting the absence of antibiotics, and complying with metal concentration regulations. These hurdles highlight the importance of developing sustainable practices for managing fish farming waste, optimizing resource utilization, and minimizing environmental risks associated with sludge disposal.