scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What is borderless world in anthropology? 


Best insight from top research papers

In anthropology, the concept of a borderless world encompasses the diminishing significance of physical and socio-political boundaries in the face of globalization, technological advancements, and evolving human interactions. This notion challenges traditional views of societies and cultures as bounded entities, suggesting instead a deterritorialization of culture where identities and social relations increasingly transcend geographical and national limits. The imagery of a borderless world, largely propagated by proponents of economic globalization, posits that the organization of production and exchange now operates on a global scale, rendering state borders analytically superfluous. Anthropological perspectives on a borderless world also engage with the complexities of border permeability and the fluidity of cultural and social dynamics. This is evident in the transnational and postnational contexts that redefine the space of nations and states, highlighting the role of non-governmental and international organizations in shaping a world where borders are less definitive. Moreover, the discourse on borderlessness is not limited to economic and cultural flows but extends to critical issues such as the spread of diseases and the management of transnational health crises, which demand cooperation across borders. However, despite the pervasive tropes of borderlessness, state borders remain a potent force, shaping societies, economies, and ecosystems. The enduring power of borders is a central focus of multidisciplinary research in border studies, which investigates how borders continue to divide and unite in a supposedly borderless world. This body of work underscores the importance of borders in the international system, even as it acknowledges the growing interdependence and interaction across different regions. The anthropological inquiry into a borderless world thus navigates between the ideational and material dimensions of borders, exploring how globalization, technological advancements, and human mobility contribute to the reconfiguration of social, cultural, and political landscapes. This exploration is crucial for understanding the evolving nature of human societies in the context of increasing global interconnectedness and the challenges it poses to traditional notions of territoriality and sovereignty.

Answers from top 10 papers

More filters
Papers (10)Insight
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2000
325 Citations
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
Book ChapterDOI
25 Oct 2018
2 Citations
A borderless world in anthropology refers to reimagining freedom and borders, questioning their oppressive nature, and advocating for open borders through careful and reflexive transformation.
Borderlands in anthropology refer to liminal zones between countries, where migrants, refugees, locals, and officials interact, shaping social relationships. It explores cosmopolitan conditions and the dynamics of these border places.
A borderless world in anthropology refers to the interconnectedness and mobility of people across global boundaries, influenced by ethics and moralities, particularly in the era of globalization.

Related Questions

What are the historical roots of borders studies in anthropology?10 answersThe historical roots of border studies in anthropology are deeply intertwined with the discipline's evolving understanding of human societies, their spatial demarcations, and the sociopolitical implications of these divisions. Initially, anthropology's engagement with borders was influenced by the field's broader interest in understanding the dynamics of human communities, particularly those situated in liminal or borderland regions. This interest was partly driven by the recognition that borders are not merely physical barriers but are imbued with significant cultural, political, and economic meanings that shape human experiences and identities. Over time, the focus of anthropological inquiry expanded from traditional communities to include so-called mobile communities, reflecting a paradigmatic shift towards understanding the diffusion of border practices and discourses, a process sometimes termed as b/ordering. This shift was accompanied by a growing awareness of the contradictory processes of border relaxation and tightening, particularly evident in the Balkans during the 1990s, which later found resonance across Europe. Such developments underscored the need for a more nuanced understanding of borders, beyond their role as mere physical demarcations. The politicization of archaeology and the intersections with border studies further enriched the anthropological discourse on borders. By focusing on boundaries and bordering processes, anthropologists began to explore the significance of borders in human societies, drawing upon a range of perspectives to fuse ancient interpretations of borderlands with contemporary debates. This interdisciplinary approach highlighted the importance of borders in structuring social relations, often in violent ways, and their role in the formation of metropolitan capitalist cores. Moreover, the comparative analysis of border-making outside of Europe, particularly in early modern West Africa and Central Asia, provided alternative approaches for understanding border-making in a global context. This global perspective challenged conventional categories and opened new avenues for research, connecting diverse spaces, historiographies, and archives. In summary, the historical roots of border studies in anthropology are marked by a gradual expansion of focus from localized borderland communities to a broader, more nuanced understanding of borders as complex sociopolitical constructs that shape human experiences and identities across time and space.
What are some key debates and perspectives on the concept of a borderless world in contemporary anthropological research?10 answersContemporary anthropological research offers a rich tapestry of debates and perspectives on the concept of a borderless world, reflecting a spectrum of theoretical and practical considerations. The notion of a borderless world, closely tied to the ideologies of globalization, has been a subject of scholarly interest, especially post-Cold War, signifying a shift towards increased flows of finance, goods, and cultural influences, as well as the advocacy for open borders in the name of freedom of movement, human rights, and economic competitiveness. This concept challenges traditional notions of territoriality and borders, suggesting a reimagining of societal and cultural dynamics in the face of deterritorialization and the intensification of mobility across geographic and cultural boundaries. Anthropologists like Victor Turner and Frederik Barth have explored the liminality of borders, examining the sensitive aspects of society where individuals confront limitations, thereby contributing to the discourse on the potential dissolution of state, national, and ethnic borders. This discourse is further enriched by the examination of superdiversity, which critiques the discipline's historical focus on stasis and bounded cultures, advocating instead for an understanding of culture as fluid and transnational, posing fundamental challenges to conventional ethnographic fieldwork. Critiques of the borderless world thesis highlight its economistic visions and cosmopolitan idealism, questioning the feasibility and desirability of erasing borders in light of moral concerns and the practical implications for territory and governance. Moreover, perspectives on borders as mechanisms of labor market regulation, global apartheid, and gender oppression suggest that the transformation towards a borderless world requires a careful, measured, and reflexive approach, acknowledging borders as products of human practice and imagination. The ontological turn in anthropology, emphasizing the coexistence of multiple natures and cultures, further complicates the narrative, suggesting that the conceptualization of a borderless world must account for the diverse ways in which human and nonhuman actors shape reality. This is echoed in the exploration of digital worlds and the impact of technological development on cultural and societal understanding, highlighting the need for transmedia literacy and critical thinking in navigating the complexities of a potentially borderless world. In summary, the debate on a borderless world in contemporary anthropological research is multifaceted, engaging with economic, political, cultural, and technological dimensions to explore the implications of diminishing borders in a globalized society.
What are the key anthropological theories and methods used in border studies?10 answersAnthropological theories and methods in border studies have evolved significantly, reflecting a rich tapestry of approaches aimed at understanding borders beyond their geopolitical implications. A pivotal aspect of these studies is the shift from viewing borders merely as territorial demarcations to recognizing them as dynamic spaces of social, cultural, and political interactions. This transformation is underpinned by both pragmatic and critical approaches, where the former focuses on the functions of borders through historical-cartographic, functional, typological, and statistical methods, while the latter delves into the cognitive-symbolic functions of borders, exploring their perception, representation, and the politics of memory and narratives. The transdisciplinary nature of border studies has been enriched by ethnological and anthropological research, particularly in Southeast Europe, where the focus has expanded to include the diffusion of border practices and discourses, termed as b/ordering. This approach acknowledges the contradictory processes of border relaxation and tightening, offering an anthropological interpretation of these phenomena. Moreover, an anthropology of borders emphasizes the violent structuring logics of the present, urging a structural consideration of global population movements and the socio-spatial differentiation intensified by border strengthening. Ethnographic methods play a crucial role in anthropological border studies, providing a grounded understanding of how borders and border regimes impact local and mobile communities. This is evident in the detailed examination of the Slovenian-Hungarian border region, where ethnographic chapters reveal the myriad ways border actors experience and respond to changes in border practices. Additionally, critical border studies and anthropology engage in a continued dialogue, exploring the potential of anthropological knowledge, methods, and practice to advance research on borders and the border-migration nexus, thereby positioning borders as a "laboratory" for developing an ethnography of the contemporary. In summary, key anthropological theories and methods in border studies encompass a blend of pragmatic and critical approaches, transdisciplinary research, and ethnographic methods, all aimed at understanding the multifaceted nature of borders as spaces of social, cultural, and political interaction.
How are waterless worlds in climate fiction?4 answersWaterless worlds are a common theme in climate fiction. These fictional worlds depict a future where water scarcity is a significant issue. In these narratives, the absence of water leads to devastating consequences for both humans and the environment. The characters in these stories often struggle to survive in a world where water is scarce, facing challenges such as drought, disease, and societal collapse. The portrayal of waterless worlds serves as a warning about the potential consequences of climate change and the importance of preserving and protecting our water resources.
How borders and alterity concepts are perceived in european borders from an anthropological perspective?4 answersBorders and alterity concepts in European borders are perceived from an anthropological perspective as complex and multidimensional phenomena. Anthropological research in Southeast Europe has focused on the diffusion of border practices and discourses, exploring the tightening and establishment of certain borders, as well as the relaxation and abolishing of others. The study of borders has gained attention across disciplines due to changing approaches to key research subjects such as the state, nation, sovereignty, citizenship, migration, and globalization. European anthropology is seen as the outcome of diverse forms of crossborder and transborder exchanges, with a focus on ethical practice, empirical evidence, historical reflection, and humanistic theorizing. Cultural studies and the humanist point of view have been recognized as having explanatory potential in understanding borders and border crossings, from territorial and social boundaries to semantically constructed and discursive borders. Alternative discourses on borders challenge the dominant discourse of security and threat, highlighting the everyday experiences of individuals navigating borders with ease and amusement.
What is the world without trees?5 answersThe world without trees would be devoid of life and essential services. Trees are not only a symbol of biodiversity and conservation worth, but they also play a crucial role in sustaining life on Earth. They convert carbon dioxide into oxygen and provide food, making them fundamental to the existence of all living beings. Additionally, trees contribute to the sustainability of ecosystems, as they grow and recede according to environmental factors. The potential role of trees in mitigating and adapting to global change is being explored as a nature-based solution to sustainability challenges. Without trees, the planet would lose its ability to support diverse ecosystems and meet the Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore, the absence of trees would have far-reaching consequences for the environment and human well-being.

See what other people are reading

What factors contributed to the deindustrialization of Indonesia in the 1990s?
5 answers
The deindustrialization of Indonesia in the 1990s was influenced by various factors. The country experienced a decline in the manufacturing sector's GDP share, coupled with output deindustrialization post-financial crisis. This trend was further exacerbated by negative and premature deindustrialization, as evidenced by a downward trend in value-added, trade performance, and productivity of the manufacturing sector. Additionally, insufficient coordination between the state and capital, both foreign and domestic, along with a lack of administrative capacity within the Indonesian state hindered industrial development post-New Order era. These factors, combined with the impact of the global economic recession on agriculture, contributed to Indonesia's deindustrialization in the 1990s.
Which international organization regulate the capitalist economy?
5 answers
International organizations play a crucial role in regulating the capitalist economy. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) are key entities involved in overseeing various aspects of global capitalism. The WTO focuses on trade regulations and shaping domestic policies in areas like healthcare and intellectual property rights. The OECD facilitates policy learning and information exchange to drive liberalization in sectors such as the telecommunications industry. Additionally, the ICMA represents stakeholders in the international capital market and engages in transnational regulatory affairs, favoring market-led solutions over increased regulatory interventions. These organizations collectively contribute to shaping the rules and frameworks that govern the global capitalist economy.
What should be considered by a university when entering into a joint venture?
5 answers
When a university considers entering into a joint venture, several factors should be taken into account. Firstly, universities can significantly contribute to research joint ventures by providing higher marginal value and lower appropriability problems to larger ventures, potentially leading to increased size and success of the joint venture. Secondly, joint ventures can offer universities opportunities to leverage their expertise in various fields, such as in the development of knowledge-based systems for medical review, which can be a cost-effective alternative to other consulting options. Additionally, successful joint ventures can result in increased external gift resources to support various university initiatives like endowed professorships, research capabilities, scholarships, and faculty development, as demonstrated by the University of New Orleans' PARTNERSHIPS 2000 CAMPAIGN.
What's the implications of China's gradualist approach to economic development and globalization?
5 answers
China's gradualist approach to economic development and its engagement with globalization have had multifaceted implications, shaping its trajectory as a global economic powerhouse while also presenting unique challenges. Initially, this approach allowed the Chinese government to learn from small policy changes and adjust its reforms before full implementation, fostering a remarkable average GDP growth rate of over 9% per annum since 1979 and propelling China to become the world's fourth-largest economy. However, the development of fully mature financial markets introduced a time-inconsistency problem, as private actors might front-run anticipated policy changes, complicating the gradual implementation of policies. The gradualist path has also been instrumental in China's integration into the global economy, with its participation in the World Trade Organization enhancing its foreign trade and economic cooperation. This integration has been critical in avoiding the middle-income trap through a transition from export-driven low-skill manufacturing to technologically advanced high-value industries, thereby increasing domestic demand and shifting towards a service-oriented economy. Yet, this transition is challenged by over-production, corporate excess capacity, and an aging population, necessitating new sources of capital accumulation, including foreign direct investment and initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative. Moreover, China's urbanization and the transformation of its cities into global economic hubs have been significant, driven by foreign capital inflow and large-scale urban redevelopment schemes. However, this rapid urbanization and economic growth have not been without social costs, including social turmoil, corruption, and an unhealthy interweaving of public and private interests. The environmental implications of China's economic policies have also been a concern, though recent findings suggest a move towards sustainable development with low-carbon emissions. In summary, while China's gradualist approach and globalization efforts have spurred unprecedented economic growth and global integration, they have also introduced complex challenges related to policy implementation, social equity, environmental sustainability, and the need for continued innovation and reform.
How does the success factor strategy influence the operation of the digital home matching platform?
5 answers
The success factor strategy plays a crucial role in shaping the operation of a digital home matching platform. It influences various aspects such as corporate value integration, platform architecture, and essential IT considerations, which are vital for enabling innovation and personalization on the platform. Additionally, the strategy impacts the matching of demand with supply, considering the heterogeneity of care requests and service providers in the home health-care context. By integrating success factors into the platform's design and operation, the platform can enhance user experience, optimize matching algorithms, and improve overall performance indicators like platform revenue, caregiver profit, and customer surplus. Moreover, the strategy can guide the development of user acquisition strategies and ranking algorithms in digital matching marketplaces, leading to more effective operations and better user outcomes.
How is SIJORI's tourism industry affected by globalization?
5 answers
SIJORI's tourism industry is significantly impacted by globalization. Globalization, characterized by the movement of goods, ideas, and people worldwide, has led to changes in the tourism sector, with political, economic, and cultural globalization playing key roles in the development of tourism activities. The immersive power of the Internet has become crucial for success in the tourism industry, highlighting the importance of web presence for entities in the sector. Furthermore, the liberalization of services due to globalization has influenced the air transportation industry, resulting in global alliances and expanded service networks, ultimately affecting pricing strategies and customer decisions in the tourism sector. These factors collectively showcase how globalization shapes and transforms SIJORI's tourism industry, emphasizing the need for adaptation to global trends and technologies.
Why are mergers good to use in internatina markets?
5 answers
Mergers are beneficial in international markets due to various reasons. Firstly, they allow companies to rapidly expand globally, increase market share, and enhance competitiveness. Additionally, international mergers and acquisitions facilitate technological advancements, cost reductions through economies of scale, and access to a wider range of products/services, ultimately improving product quality and customer offerings. Moreover, mergers enable firms to enter new markets easily, boost innovation activities, enhance export performance, and increase competitive power. However, challenges such as cultural differences and assimilation issues can arise, potentially leading to managerial problems and unsuccessful outcomes. Overall, mergers in international markets serve as strategic tools for companies to achieve rapid growth, global dominance, and competitive advantages.
What is cross cultural management?
5 answers
Cross-cultural management refers to the practice of managing cultural diversity in a global business environment. It involves understanding and utilizing the features of national cultures, interpersonal communications, and business ethics to navigate international business successfully. Cultural differences impact various aspects of organizations, such as personal relationships, cooperative norms, time awareness, and potential conflicts. Effective cross-cultural management strategies include developing intercultural competencies, training global managers in key aspects of intercultural interaction, utilizing digital technologies, and implementing knowledge management systems. The goal is to minimize misunderstandings and conflicts that may arise due to cultural diversity within multinational corporations, ensuring smooth operations and high performance.
How is Singarpore tourism industry affected by globalization?
4 answers
Singapore's tourism industry is significantly impacted by globalization. The global community's interconnectivity, driven by economic, social, and technological factors, has made many destinations accessible, leading to an ever-expanding touristic market. Globalization positively influences the tourism economy by fostering economic development, employment opportunities, and the spread of technical knowledge. Moreover, the tourism sector relies on direct foreign investment, highlighting its importance in the global economy. As national boundaries blur due to globalization, Singapore's tourism industry experiences changes in consumer values, environmental considerations, and socio-cultural dynamics, necessitating proactive responses from tourism managers to ensure sustainability in operations.
What are the opportunities that multinational corporations face because of the current technological war between USA and China?
5 answers
Multinational corporations face both challenges and opportunities due to the ongoing technological war between the USA and China. The conflict has led to a shift in global innovation dynamics, with both countries emerging as key players in advanced technologies. This situation presents opportunities for MNCs to adapt by devising new strategies to keep up with technological advancements and resolve dependencies on foreign suppliers. Additionally, the convergence of trade and investment strategies with sanctioning policies has created a landscape where MNCs can explore new avenues for growth and development in the high-tech markets affected by the conflict. However, the need to navigate through the complexities of the evolving technological relationship between the two superpowers poses a significant challenge for MNCs in maintaining their competitive edge and global market presence.
What are the main constraints for developing medicine industries and innovation in Sub-saharan Africa?
5 answers
Constraints for developing medicine industries and innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa include institutional weaknesses hindering outcomes, late assimilation of innovation momentum and inadequate investment in the region, poor healthcare infrastructure and funding challenges, lack of progress in translational medicine due to reliance on external research findings and insufficient resources, and fragmented drug regulations, suboptimal enforcement, and poorly designed disincentives affecting medicine access. These factors collectively impede the growth of the medicine sector and innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting the need for improved institutional frameworks, increased investment in innovation, better healthcare access, enhanced research capabilities, and regulatory harmonization to overcome these constraints and foster development in the pharmaceutical industry.